« Back to story "Obama Committed a Felony Violation of the Logan Act"

Story Comments

Posted by: Wil 1 year, 3 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 70%
    Wil1 year, 3 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    It would be a serious charge, if it were true.

    Unsurprisingly, it comes from a source who has no credibility, and is a known liar:

    http://www.propeller.com/story/2008/09/16/iraq-sch...

    This is just another attempt by the McCain campaign to distract voters from how out of touch he is, and how wrong he is on every single issue that Americans care about.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    8 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 25%
      Wolfie20071 year, 3 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      A story on a left wing blog doesn't really mean a lot.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      3 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        Tangent0011 year, 3 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Yet a story from a right wing blog does?

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        2 Replies

        loading loading ...
    • 100%
      kobzikov1 year, 3 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Actually, it wouldn't be a serious charge even if it was true, because no one has ever been prosecuted on the basis of Logan Act since its passage in 1799.

      As a matter of fact, I'd love for someone to bring a suit so that it's finally declared unconstitutional.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        flyonthewallzz1 year, 3 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Our mistake: Note to readers
        Douglas Kelly, National Post Published: Wednesday, May 24, 2006
        ""Last Friday, the National Post ran a story prominently on the front page alleging that the Iranian parliament had passed a law that, if enacted, would require Jews and other religious minorities in Iran to wear badges that would identify them as such in public. It is now clear the story is NOT TRUE. Given the seriousness of the error, I felt it necessary to explain to our readers how this happened."
        The story of the alleged badge law first came to us in the form of a column by AMIR TAHRINI. Mr. Taheri, an Iranian author and journalist, has written widely on Iran for many major publications. In his column, Mr. Taheri wrote at length about the new law, the main purpose of which is to establish an appropriate dress code for Muslims. Mr. Taheri went on to say that under the law, "Religious minorities would have their own colour schemes. They will also have to wear special insignia, known as zonnar, to indicate their non-Islamic faith.""
        http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=6df...

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
      • 0%
        bigurn1 year, 3 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Wil, as of this morning there are three witnesses to the conversation, and they are standing by the story as true. As with the National Enquirer story, it turns out to be true.

        Senator Obama apparently committed a Logan Act violation.

        This is a felony.

        This is NOT a "distraction", Wil. It seems as though every time we see Senator Obama for who he is it gets termed a "distraction".

        Now, will he get investigated? I doubt it. Very few people will want to get in the way of an ongoing election.

        Should he get investigated? Absolutely.

        Your guy used his position to attempt to impact the outcome of an ongoing election in his favor. Pretty unsavory.

        If that's "Hope and Change", I'll pass.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          DoubleL1 year, 3 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          So Amir Taheri lied about everything?

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply
          loading loading ...

        Post Reply

        You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

        People Who Liked This Comment (21)

        People Who Didn't Like This Comment (9)