« Back to story "Radical bailout plan has a jawdropping price tag"

Story Comments

Posted by: Candida 1 year, 3 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 100%
    Candida1 year, 3 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    quackpot: "Yes, it will be necessary for EACH ONE OF US to pony up an average of $3,000 to bail out the crooks that created this mess."

    Yes, it will be necessary now, but all of this could have been avoided. All 50 states tried to take action years ago, and the federal government prevented them.

    Predatory Lenders' Partner in Crime
    How the Bush Administration Stopped the States From Stepping In to Help Consumers
    By Eliot Spitzer
    Thursday, February 14, 2008

    "Predatory lending was widely understood to present a looming national crisis. This threat was so clear that as New York attorney general, I joined with colleagues in the other 49 states in attempting to fill the void left by the federal government. Individually, and together, state attorneys general of both parties brought litigation or entered into settlements with many subprime lenders that were engaged in predatory lending practices. Several state legislatures, including New York's, enacted laws aimed at curbing such practices.

    What did the Bush administration do in response? Did it reverse course and decide to take action to halt this burgeoning scourge? As Americans are now painfully aware, with hundreds of thousands of homeowners facing foreclosure and our markets reeling, the answer is a resounding no.

    Not only did the Bush administration do nothing to protect consumers, it embarked on an aggressive and unprecedented campaign to prevent states from protecting their residents from the very problems to which the federal government was turning a blind eye... "
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/artic...

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      flyonthewallzz1 year, 3 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      POS from FLY

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        jordan111 year, 3 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        That's right! I had forgotten about that So many slimy dealings have gone on the last eight years, I can't keep up with it,

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...

      Post Reply

      You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

      People Who Liked This Comment (1)

      People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)

      No one voted this comment negatively.