Comments for Is Sarah Palin a Quitter »
Posted By sonicpalette 1 year, 3 months ago in Political NewsThe recent coverage of comments made regarding the opinions that Sarah Palin was far over her head as a Vice-presidential candidate have struck a public note of interest.
Read Full Story at thesecretpathoflife.com »
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentComments So Far: 180
-
18%
leftylemn1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
SARAH PALIN HAS MORE EXPERIENCE AND IS MORE QUALIFIED THAN OBAMA. GOOD BYE U.S.A.....TAX AND SPEND LIBERALS WILL FINISH THE JOB OF BANKRUPTING US THAT BUSH BEGAN. IT'S BEEN A NICE RIDE, NICE KNOWING YOU ALL. GOTTA GO POLISH UP ON MY FRENCH AND SPANISH.VOTE MCCAIN/PALIN.....PLEEEEEASE.
Reply-
21%
UnDumbed1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
If you do some research, Carter and Clinton started the mess that we as taxpayers have to pay for. Not Bush. War yes, you can blame Congress and Bush. But, haven't we been safe ever since 9-11. It isn't because the Terrorist have not tried, it is because they were stopped. If you do some research you will find that the Democrats in Congress and Senate were making bundles in kickbacks from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, with Obama being number 2 on the list of the big takers. In 144 days in the Senate, he ask for 143 billion dollars in earmarks. Most of which he would have recieved a kick back. I pray daily that God lead us in the right direction, but God can only do so much. With all of the voter fraud that is already being caught, we are in deep doo doo.
Reply-
17%
gerisgirls1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Think about when Clinton got in office He cut our military big time made us look very weak, to the point that 911 happened. If our military wouldn't have been cut, 911 most likely wouldn't have happened. Then sure under clinton we weren't as deep in debt BUT we were saving funds on our lack of military, So Bush gets in . 911 happens, So now we have to put up a crapful of money to rebuild our military, Bush had to fix Clinton bad choices. If Clinton wasn't such a pancy we wouldn't be going through what we are now. And for Sarah She has more balls then Clinton could ever wish for!!!!!
Reply-
80%
thanos19191 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
gerisgirls and UnDumbed, are you two freakin' insane? You are saying that Clinton started this mess by cutting the military budget was why 911 happened?!!
Reply
What the hell is wrong with your brain! Bush had ALL THE INTELLIGENCE IN THE LAND to stop 911. He just didn't think that anyone was bold enough to do that.
1.) Clinton signed a REPUBLICAN CONGRESS BILL that would help more people own homes. Here that, A REPUBLICAN CONGRESS BILL. Now, if the Wall Street Republicans wouldn't have been so GREEDY, then this financial meltdown wouldn't be happening now.
That's what happens when you put your trust in some freakin' Republican financial sharks.
2.) How, IN THE HELL, you can say that "911 was Clinton's fault" and that Bush had to "fix Clinton's mistakes" is PREPOSTEROUS!!!! Our Military had a war when Clinton was in office that he ENDED...you know, THE GULF WAR!!
What, you're saying that the soldiers were weak then?? You both are idiots.
You freakin' Republicans are INSANE when it comes to the famous "Republican Spin." Let's look at this in a simple way (if you imbeciles can even comprehend simplicity):
1.) We are currently in war in Iraq that Bush has now asked to be extended to 2011!
2.) We are currently in war in Afghanistan!
3.) John McInsane is talking about bombing Iran!
4.) Sarah Palin is talking about potentially having to go to war with Russia, a NUCLEAR FREAKIN' POWER!!
(For those of you who can't count or read, that's 4 freakin' wars!)
George Dubya has:
1.) ...allowed the most deadly attack on American soil to happen...
2.) ...Overstretched our Military in a war against someone who was no imminent threat to our security, which is why Russia LAUGHED AT US when we tried to use "stern words" when they invaded Georgia. They knew we were weakened by our overstretched military, so they weren't in the slightest worried about us...
3.) ...had the worse response in a national natural disaster, leaving individuals devastated by hurricane Katrina TO DIE ...
4.) ...run the economy into the worse economic crisis since the Great Depression...
Yet, here you two are talking about it's all Clinton's fault? ROFL. You all are hard line, lying, intellectually dishonest, right-winged nut jobs.
**BREAKING NEWS!!!**
Bush has had FOUR MAJOR, NEGATIVE, AND DISASTROUS SITUATIONS OCCUR ON HIS PRESIDENTIAL WATCH. He is no longer "arguably" anymore, but LITERALLY THE WORSE PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE FREE WORLD!!
Yet here you are, gerisgirls and UnDumbed, talking negatively about Clinton, one of the best president EVER. Even with all of this American bloodshed, gore, and Republican warmongering, you Republicans are STILL talking about "George Bush is great!". You are mental, THAT'S what you are. The proof is all in this message. SWALLOW IT WHOLE! -
-
79%
jebon1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Amazing how Republicans talk about tax and spend liberals but are willing to look the other way as their borrow and spend conservatives wreck the country. Reagan added far more to the national debt than Carter. Not once did he balance his budget. That is an indication that his economic ideas were not sound. He could not pay for them. Bush I never balanced a budget sending us further into debt. Clinton reversed the Republican trend and gave the country a balanced budget. He left W a trillion dollar surplus. Which that fiscal conservative promptly spent. Bush II is the consummate conservative fulfilling every conservative's wet dream. He cut taxes on the wealthy. IN A TIME OF WAR. He has never balanced a budget. As a matter of fact he has doubled the national debt amassing more debt than all other presidents combined. Your saviour John McCain has already stated that he will not balance the budget until 2013. More of the same failed conservative policies. That tax and spend liberal Obama shows how he will pay for every nickle of his economic plan. You conservatives can fool yourself into believing that Republicans take care of our finances but the record of the last 3 Republican presidents along with the proposal of the current nominee tell differently. As for the economic meltdown it is happening because of deregulation. The conservative track record is quite astounding. The S scandal of the 80's happened because of deregulation. The Enron scandal happened because of deregulation. Now our entire financial system is melting down because of deregulation. And who is one of McCain's chief economic advisors? Phil Gramm who wrote the Bill to deregulate the financial sector. Yet you trust him to fix what he broke? The 100+ lobbyists on McCain's staff will make sure that the Maverick sticks to the status quo. The brilliant bailout alternative put forth by Republicans and echoed by the straight talk express is to further deregulate the industry and give corporations more tax cuts. McCain himself held up the deregulation of the financial sector as an example of how the healthcare system could be reformed. Are you willing to gamble your health on his bad judgement and allegiance to failed conservative ideology? No thanks.
Reply-
71%
not2needy1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You will never get a one of them to even read your post, let alone agree with any of it. If they have to, they will go back to George Washington to find someone to blame this situation on rather than where the real blame lies, with the repugs.
Reply-
40%
beavith11 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
jebon is wrong or nuts or both.
Reply
-Clinton did not leave a $1 T surplus.
-Reagan's economic 'ideas' are not wrong. its the politicians that write the laws to benefit certain groups.
Mccain balance the budget by 2013? even that is optimistic when you consider how little of the budget is discretionary.
i'm tired of typing. go do some of your own research.
let's just say, you're about 80% wrong...-
-
TcarosComment removed: Hard Banned
-
-
-
-
82%
jimsit1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Those of you who manage to keep a straight face while blaming Clinton for our financial and international image and condition have got to have ADD. Bill Clinton's Presidency left this country at peace, with a surplus and not a dollar iin deficits, created more jobs than any time inhistory and earned the respect politically of the entire world.
Reply-
50%
beavith11 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
AHAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAAAA!
Reply
last week Slick Willy noted that he should't have signed the CRA reauthorization bil in 1995 but Fannie and Freddie were making lots of money and had cash on hand.
yes. that Slick Willy.
what happened was that normal lending rules went out the window. it took Wall Street 10 years to game the rules.
straight face? i'm howling with anger!-
TcarosComment removed: Hard Banned
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
david_nwpa1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Actually, 9/11 happened on Bush's watch. It might not have if he had taken the warnings more seriously. Condi tried to tell him at his ranch in Crawford, Texas, on August 9, 2001, but he would not listen. As for other terrorist attacks, consider the bombing of our embassy in Yemen in 2008. Our allies have been attacked in Germany, London, Madrid, and the Philippines. If you do some research, you would discover that numerous Republicans have been receiving kickbacks from oil and natural gas companies. Praying that God leads us anywhere is a bunch of nonsense. If you want to make change in this country, get out in the public eye and make some change on your own. Until then, quit yapping about how much the Dems have messed up without nailing the Repubs for the same actions.
Reply -
0%
rocc1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
undumbed,
Reply
do a little more research...it began with ronald r. the great conservative deregulator...clinton was the one with a BALANCED budget (not that the budget has anything to do with the mess on wall street)...and ALASKA is the NUMBER ONE earmark taker ! and hop, what the hell does friendly have to do with being qualified for the job ? sarah palin doesn't even have enough sense to know that she is sooooo out of her league ! some of you people seem to be confused and think yr voting for american idol.
-
-
79%
miklkit1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The Democrats try to pay for their programs. The republicons do not even try to pay for their pet projects. Historically the economy has done better with Democrats in control, while it has tanked when republicons are running things. Like now. Look at this chart.
Reply
http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/faq.html-
50%
not2needy1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
So true mik, in fact, repugs want to make bills, spend, spend, spend and then leave it to democrats to clean up.. That's why they hate dems so much, our party has done nothing for the past 4 decades but clean up their mess. Ever since Nixon, probably before.
Reply-
33%
Klarissa1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
how would you dems pay for these, just 3 of the proposals:
Reply
Obama will create 20 Promise Neighborhoods in areas that have high levels of poverty and crime and low levels of student academic achievement in cities across the nation.
The Promise Neighborhoods will be modeled after the Harlem Children's Zone, which provides a full network of services, including early childhood education, youth violence prevention efforts and after-school activities, to an entire neighborhood from birth to college.
Obama proposes to achieve almost universal service for the nation’s 17 million college students by offering a refundable annual tax credit of $4,000 toward college tuition. This program should cost about $65-100 billion a year, perhaps more if it substantially increases the number of students attending college. In return for the credit, college students will be required to perform 100 hours of community service every year for four years. By offering college students a hefty $40 an hour, Mr. Obama will ensure that nearly every college student will participate in his program, without actually making their service mandatory.
Obama is announcing plans to expand President Bush's program steering federal social service dollars to religious groups.-
100%
protoham1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
He doesn't have to fund it. Because talk is cheap! Nothing will actually happen.
Reply
Just like he helped his community as a community organizer and started suing the bank so they had to make loans to people who could not afford it. Now they are in the street, no money, no credit. Maybe they will come to the White house and live with him.
-
-
-
100%
protoham1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Try to comprehend that Congress controls the budget. So you have to put this chart in perspective as to who was in charge in congress.
Reply
As far as I am concerned I would like to see congress limited to spending only a certain amount of the GDP.
So how is BO's tax cut and spending increase going to make this better? -
100%
buckncindykill1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I'm stealing brilliant talking points from ChuckCanuck. And I quote.....
Reply
"A thread of the brain dead.
Call me anything you want, but you people are truly pathetic. I’m amazed that any of you managed to live long enough to learn to read and write. You people prove time and time again, that most liberals are dumber than dirt."
-
-
-
63%
hyperbola1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Maybe the rapture will come along soon enough to save Sarah from further embarrassment.
Reply
Sarah Palin and the Rapture
Is this country ready for a president who is excited about and eagerly looking forward to the Rapture?
Anyone who believes in the Rapture scenario will likely interpret a catastrophic nuclear exchange as the opening scene of the Rapture. A believer in the Rapture with his or her fingers on the nuclear trigger might even be tempted to bring on the Rapture.
Presumably Sarah Palin believes in the Rapture. It is one of the doctrines of her religion, and she has nowhere disavowed it. Are Americans ready to sleep at night with a President who longs for the Rapture?
The Rapture doctrine has no support in the historic Christianity of any of the main traditions - Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, or Protestant. The doctrine of the Rapture is cobbled together from several obscure, unrelated comments drawn from the epistles of Paul the Apostle. No credible biblical scholar in two thousand years of Christian history has taken seriously the Rapture doctrine, millennialism, or anything similar to it.
http://www.propeller.com/story/2008/09/21/sarah-pa...-
-
-
0%
Dimpanne1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I would not call any passages in the Bible "obscure". Paul was used to write 13 of the 27 books in the New Testament and was one of the greatest Christians who ever lived. Every word was written for doctrine, reproof, correction and instruction and Jesus Himself honored the written Word and quoted it. Jesus also told us to "look up" when certain things begin to happen in this world, which you can read in Luke, Chapter 21, beginning with verse 8.
Reply
-
-
33%
Klarissa1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
wow, a real responsible souce
Reply
http://www.thesecretpathoflife.com/blog/2008/09/27...
who is this person?
HuOS The Human Life Map - The Secret Path Of Life
A. James Gentry - Copyright 2008 All Rights Reserved -
TcarosComment removed: Hard Banned
-
-
-
-
-
70%
phd1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Yes, Sarah Palin should definitely step down. She's an embarrassment to femininity and a source of ridicule for the Republicans, and it's only going to get worse from here. She can "use" her infant as an excuse and leave with dignity, the nation will applaud her, the Republicans can make a sound choice in their VP pick and perhaps still pull this election out of the bag, But NOT with her on the ticket. She's a liability. Perhaps she can try again in 10-15 years, when she has some political miles under her belt and manage to not make a fool of herself in national forums. I feel sorry for her, her ambition far outweighs her knowledge and her abilities. Back to Wasilla Sarah, where you can resume being a big fish in your very, very small pond.
Reply-
25%
dacajun1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
She should not step down. McCain's bunch should turn her loose. She is a hell of a lot smarter than anyone on his team. But, she is a different type than the crooks and lairs them are use to managing. Let her say what she wants. That is why the American people loved her.Now they are changing her and she is uncomable and it shows.I am 65 and had never registored to vote until she came along. If we drops out I will not vote again.
Reply-
-
79%
BillieMaxer1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You are going to vote for the first time because there is a pretty lady in neat glasses running for VP, or because there is an intelligent, knowledgeable ,brilliant,experienced woman running for VP. Well we know the answer to that one, so maybe you better continue not voting.
Reply -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
67%
amazed1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
excuse me???
Reply
If it weren't for affirmative action, he would never have gotten into Columbia with his B average in high school. He won't release his grades, but Columbia confirms that he graduated with NO honors -- meaning, at best, a not quite B average -- again -- an affirmative action (or some other type of largess) admittance to Harvard Law --definitely not on his merits.
-
-
-
31%
KKF46861 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I love how people think! I am not confident she was the right choice but at least we can give her the opportunity of the first debate to see how she stands up. We, the people" were willing to give Obama the benifit of the doubt. What is the difference. We have one seasoned presidential candiate and one Junior.
Reply
Why not one seasoned vice president and one Junior? What makes Obama for acceptable and Palin not?
Have you compared their records Obamaclaims all these proposals but where is the action record on the senate floor. His job is to serve and protect how many bills has he sponsored? Thoughts from Independent-Undecided female from Texas -
-
67%
Aotearoa1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
lefty....."TAX AND SPEND LIBERALS WILL FINISH THE JOB OF BANKRUPTING US THAT BUSH BEGAN"
Reply
don't know if I should laugh or cry. You obviously have not a clue in what your saying. king george bush is a bloody republican . Mcbush and what's her face is a bloomin repug. You republicans are the reason why America is sailing down shyt creek . Billions of $$ a month in your war for oil in Iraq and yet Osama is still vacationing in the desert somewhere. King george said " god" told him to invade Iraq, funny thing is whats her face from Alaska said the same thing that it was " god's " will to invade Iraq. We now know that it was chenny who whispered in king george's ears. Wonder who whispered inm what's her face's ears? maybe one of the many moose she has slaughtered. Lol!!!!!..palin is way out of her league and I suspect she'll be the reason why the repugs will lose big time.
-
-
20%
HOP1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
NO SARAH DO NOPT SPEP DOWN, LET THOSE THAT ARE SO JEALOUS OF YOUR ACCOMPLISHMENTS, JKUST TAKE A BACK SEAT, YOU ARE A BEAUTIFUL PERSON , EXPERIENCED AND HAVE GOOD JUDGEMENT AND A VERY FRIENDLY PERSON , IT SHOWS WHEN YOU ARE ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK, WHEN THESE PEOPLE SPEAK OUT WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT JUST TAKE IT FROM THE SOURCE IT CAME AND GO ON. WE ARE WITH YOU
Reply
SMILE GOD LOVES YOU, GOD BLESS YOU AND YOURS-
-
14%
Klarissa1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I will take an honest smart woman over Biden any day.
Reply
It was also discovered that, while at Syracuse Law School, Biden had plagiarized a law review article in a class paper he wrote.
Biden said the act was inadvertent due to his not knowing the proper rules of citation, and Biden was permitted to retake the course after receiving a grade of F in the course.
Biden also released at the same time the record of his grades as an undergraduate which were C's and D's and an F in ROTC during his first three semesters.
Further, when questioned by a New Hampshire resident about his grades in law school Biden had claimed falsely to have graduated in the "top half" of his class, (when he actually graduated 76th in a class of 85 .
1988
Democratic presidential candidate Joseph R. Biden Jr., a U.S. senator from Delaware, was driven from the nomination battle after delivering, without attribution, passages from a speech by British Labor party leader Neil Kinnock.
A barrage of subsidiary revelations by the press also contributed to Biden's withdrawal: a serious plagiarism incident involving Biden during his law school years; the senator's boastful exaggerations of his academic record at a New Hampshire campaign event; and the discovery of other quotations in Biden's speeches pilfered from past Democratic politicians.
-
-
-
72%
arachnephilim1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Call me prudent but Sarah was done for as soon as she said (paraphrasing this so don't point fingers for not getting it 100% word for word), if Russia moves into Georgia we'll go to war with them...though she did apologize, a world leader shouldn't have to apologize for mistakes such as those. They need to be an example the people must follow, and naivete and the apparent inexperience (or the hunger of power) whichever people decide it is, is not what we need. I do agree, in maybe 8 years she should come back after she composes herself.
Reply
But hey if anyone else has any evidence to support against this statement, I am willing to read anything so that I can gain a broader understanding of different points of views.-
22%
Georgia501 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
She was referring to Georgia as a NATO ally, and went on to explain that the NATO alliance is a mutual defense treaty, which it is.
Reply
Compare that to Obama, as an Illinois state legislator, stating that a preemptive strike against Iran could be necessary: “In light of the fact that we’re now in Iraq, with all the problems in terms of perceptions about America that have been created, us launching some missile strikes into Iran is not the optimal position for us to be in. On the other hand, having a radical Muslim theocracy in possession of nuclear weapons is worse. So I guess my instinct would be to err on not having those weapons in the possession of the ruling clerics of Iran."
Preemptive missile strike on Iran? Hmm...sounds so....Bushy.-
78%
arachnephilim1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Duly noted. Yet, the public announcement of such, even in the appropriated context as you mentioned, isn't wise due to the fact that Russia is a powerful super country and ally.
Reply
On the second behalf didn't he already explain that his first intentions were negotiations? Not denying what he said, yet in light of other things he has said and together analyzing the context as a whole picture it just seems to be a step.
From what I have analyzed from the global situation is, he wants to try and conclude Iraq (because it should of never happened) and actually go to Afghanistan because that's where the real problems are anyway. (McCain said that Iraq and Afghanistan are connected, which is quite frankly incredibly loaded). The Iran crisis is a touchy subject, no matter how you look at it. But after reviewing both sides approach to it, I feel that Obama's negotiation then act approach is the only way; because if we use McCain's approach, by simply pushing everything under the rug and not acknowledging any fact whatsoever of their existence as if they're "terrorists," then it's possible a nuclear war can occur. By saying preemptive missile strikes generally dictate, "yes, this country is hostile towards us, this is inevitable and I'd rather strike first." But right now, as I can see towards anyone's platforms, that is not the first immediate reaction and people need to see that.
So to prevent further straying of topic, my feelings still remain the same until someone can come by and present the details, with evidence, and compare it with the whole picture.-
60%
miklkit1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
As an addendum, I think the republicons are actively seeking war with Iran because they went straight to the threats stage without any negotiations. also, there is this little item.....
Reply
http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/article... -
50%
beavith11 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
....then it's possible a nuclear war can occur. By saying preemptive missile strikes generally dictate, "yes, this country is hostile towards us, this is inevitable and I'd rather strike first."....
Reply
we won't have to worry about attacking Iran. Iran, currently, is a clear danger to the US, Europe and Israel.
when Iran becomes a clear and PRESENT danger to Israel, the israelis will take them out.
to your point, we could see another limited nuclear war....-
Neutral
arachnephilim1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"we won't have to worry about attacking Iran. Iran, currently, is a clear danger to the US, Europe and Israel. "
Reply
Continue the quote...
"when Iran becomes a clear PRESENT danger to Israel..."
you yourself stated that Iran currently, IS a clear danger...in correspondence to "when Iran becomes a danger" and to Israel, which the previous quote states so in relation to the supportive statement.
so you are saying they are a danger and Israel is preparing to take them out, are you not? By your choice of words and syntax it is apparently so.
-
-
Neutral
Klarissa1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
arach - Interesting that you would say: "From what I have analyzed from the global situation is, he wants to try and conclude".
Reply
I have heard that from other Obama supporters - "I think he .....".
This tells me that he makes such general statements that anyone can think that he has said what they want to hear.-
Neutral
arachnephilim1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Correction, from what I have said only means that I read into what people say, it has nothing to do about generalities. In the debate he openly did come out and say there are steps to take, not jumping into a situation which a lot of people are assuming.
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
-
75%
nikkibabe1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Whether she wins or not, she will be a great comic relief feed for all the late night talks shows, especially SNL.
Reply
She will beat other Republican clowns, Dan Quayle and Bush hands down.
As for being qualified to being a President, I think she is an expert in economic and financial matters. She lives next door to a BANK and can see it from her bathroom window!-
82%
jebon1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Don't forget she is also a brilliant zoologist because of all the polar bears and penguins in her state. And an oceanographer because the ocean borders her state. And with the stars flying into Alaskas air space that means she is also an expert in astronomy. And with all the oil under Alaskan soil, she is obviously a great geologist. Being next to the north pole makes her an expert in Santa Clause as well. So that means she is the most charitable person EVER. Wow this woman is so accomplished. She might be the greatest person to ever live. She and McCain should switch places.
Reply-
29%
Georgia501 year, 3 months ago
-
73%
jebon1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I'm sure if you ask them nicely Putin and Kim Jung Il and Osama bin Laden won't pick on her either. Maybe it's time the McCain campaign stop sheltering their choice for VP. If they have no confidence in her ability to explain herself and her views how can you expect her to lead the free world? Joe Biden will go on any show and debate anyone. Palin obviously can not handle the pressure. Where has she been? Do you really have confidence in someone that can not be trusted to campaign? It appears she was chosen for her pretty face and what is between her legs. Not her political acumen. You should be very worried that this is the kind of judgment that John McCain exercises. If he really put his country first he would have chosen someone who undoubtedly could step in as President.
Reply-
23%
Georgia501 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Ask them NOT to? Hell...I'm counting on it.
Reply
As for sheltering Palin, I think you may misunderstand who exactly the McCain campaign is protecting.
"No, Sarah, this is not the time to bring up Biden's father and brother. Let them have their day in court."
'No, Sarah, if Biden's son, as attorney general, wants to file false arrest warrants against those who say they had a homosexual tryst with Obama, we're not going to smear his sorry ass with it in the debates. That goes for the 3 men in Obama's church found dead, too. We have no evidence they, too, were sexually involved with Obama."-
-
-
-
83%
jebon1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
yeah right so McCain is protecting Biden? So you believe the guy who claims he had a fling with Obama? And you believe that Obama is ordering the execution of his church members? I'm sure you believe he is a secret muslim too. But I bet you don't believe the rumors about Palin's affair do you. The Republican party loves people like you. Ignorant, gullible and too lazy to research their lies and smears. They can count on people like you to vote for them no matter how many lies they tell. No matter how many laws they break. No matter how bad their policies destroy this country. No matter how much debt they pile on you. You'll believe anything they shove down your throat. You be a good Republican soldier and fall in line. No thinking necessary.
Reply-
80%
cushi1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Calls for a reprint of my Robot Song (to the tune of "I'm Your Puppet"),
Reply
written for all "robo" repugs:
Pull my string, and I’ll, do anything…I’m your robot!
Lie to me, but I, will still believe….I’m your robot!
Rob me blind, but I, won’t change my mind…I’m your robot!
Though war is wack, I’ll go, die in Iraq…I’m your robot!
Chorus: Don’t increase my pay, give me debt to stay…
I’ll still do just what you say-y-y….I’m your robot!
Soldiers die, but I, don’t question why…I’m your robot!
All who protest should be, under to arrest…I’m your robot!
Mentally ill, so I, stick with you still…I’m your robot!
Your head is wood, and you're misunderstood…I’m your robot!
Chorus: Yes I'd die for you, lie just like you do…
Kiss you’re a*s and like it, too-o-o…..I’m your robot!
If truth be told, now you, control my soul…I’m your robot!
4,000 gone, but you, say let's stay on…I’m your robot!
I sleep at night, convinced, you must be right…I’m your robot!
But if you're wrong, I'll still, go right along…I’m your robot!
Chorus: When you go to hell, I will go as well…
everybody there, I’ll tell…I’m your robot!
-
-
-
-
100%
jebon1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
And the Bush strategy of threatening them if they don't do everything we say is working brilliantly. Both North Korea and Iran have gotten stronger in the last 8 years. If your neighbor pointed a gun at you I you'd go out and buy your own gun to defend yourself. Iran just watched the US invade Iraq and depose its government based on lies. And got away with it. Then the US starts threatening them. Of course they are going to build up their defense. Threatening them has only encouraged them to speed up the process. Fools. I'm sure you will be first in line to enlist when we attack Iran won't you.
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
78%
Tango571 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The question should be considering the age and health of John McCain is whether or not Sarah can be the President if called to duty. As VP her role will be minimal. John will send her overseas to represent the softer side of America. She will have no role in day to day operations. John asked her to join him for one reason and that was to get the womens votes. It's the only way he has a shot at the nomination.
Reply-
20%
Georgia501 year, 3 months ago
-
-
80%
Sabretooth1 year, 3 months ago
-
0%
Klarissa1 year, 3 months ago
-
-
100%
techsupport1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
From wikipedia (emphasis mine):
Reply
"Obama entered Harvard Law School in late 1988. At the end of his first year, he was selected, based on his grades and a writing competition, as an editor of the Harvard Law Review.[19] ... After graduating with a Juris Doctor (J.D.) magna *** laude from Harvard in 1991, he returned to Chicago."
To be clear, the words magna *** laude mean "with great honor." They are reserved for students who achieve academic excellence.
Unless you have verifiable proof otherwise, I will take magna *** laude from a prestigious institution such as Harvard University as quite credible evidence that Sen. Obama was much more than a "mediocre student."-
0%
Klarissa1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Published On Thursday, March 21, 1996 12:00 AM
Reply
By THE CRIMSON STAFF
As Harvard College continues to flounder in the mires of grade inflation, we applaud the Law School for setting stricter limits on the number of students who graduate with honors.
Currently, 70 percent of graduating law students achieve the minimum grade point average to receive a *** laude degree. With that ridiculous fact staring them in the face, Law School faculty members overwhelmingly voted to bestow honors upon only 40 percent of the graduating class.
***********************
Using a competitive process that takes into account first-year grades, an editing exercise, and a written commentary on a court decision, The Harvard Law Review selects between 41 and 43 editors annually from the second-year Law School class, which numbers 560.
Two editors from each of first-year class's seven sections (fourteen in all) are selected half by their first year grades and half by their scores on the writing competition. Another twenty are selected solely on their scores on the writing competition. The other seven to nine are selected by a discretionary committee, either to fulfill the review's race-based affirmative action program, to select students who just missed the cut by either of the other two processes, or by some other criteria as the committee sees fit.
Until the 1970's the editors were picked on the basis of grades, and the president of the Law Review was the student with the highest academic rank.
That system came under attack in the 1970's and was replaced by a program in which about half the editors are chosen for their grades and the other half are chosen by fellow students after a special writing competition. The new system, disputed when it began, was meant to help insure that minority students became editors of The Law Review.-
100%
techsupport1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Your argument seems to be:
Reply
Harvard University gives out honors to some students who are mediocre.
Sen. Obama attended Harvard University and achieved these honors.
Therefore...
Sen. Obama must be a mediocre student.
This is fallacious reasoning. Unless you have some actual proof that he was a mediocre student, your statement that "Sen. Obama was a mediocre student" is not credible.-
Neutral
Klarissa1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I'm not sure what the truth is about obama being admitted to Harvard, so I will not repeat it.
Reply
However, there is a question about how he paid for it.
tech - the wikipedia story was scrubbed - 70% of the class received cu*m laud. Tradition has it that one of the top 3 students, SUMMA cu*m laud is editor.
Furthermore, it is unheard of for the editor to not submit an article under his/her name. -
-
Neutral
techsupport1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Klarissa - I stand corrected regarding my assumption that honors at Harvard can be trusted to correlate to achievement. Thanks for the information.
Reply
However, your original contention is that Sen. Obama was a mediocre student. You haven't shown any reason to believe that yet.
"there is a question about how he paid for it."
Red herring. This has nothing to do with his academic achievement.
"also, unfortunately, you have the failed Annenberg project to contend with."
Another red herring. This relates to his professional achievement, but has nothing to do with his record as a student.
"I would like to know how many times he went to trial - and what the outcome was."
Hate to sound like a broken record, but yet another red herring.
These are all valid questions, but they do not support your contention that Sen. Obama was a mediocre student. You're a good researcher, Klarissa. I'm surprised that you would make claims that you cannot support without qualifying those claims as mere opinion.
-
-
-
0%
Dobes_Rule1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Klarissa - see below from Wiktionary - Your article refers to C*M laude - NOT Magna C*M Laude:
Reply
*** laude -- with praise
magna *** laude -- with great praise
Obama graduated with great praise, Magna C*M :Laude - so your article doesn't EVEN pertain to Senator Obama.-
Neutral
Klarissa1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
try summa for top 10%
Reply
magna and regular the other 60%. Since Obama has not released his grades or his standing, we don't know if he was at the 50,60,70,or 80th percentile.
had he been in the top 20%, more than respectable, I am sure we would know about it.-
Dobes_RuleComment removed: Spam
-
0%
Dobes_Rule1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Well - apparently two links mean spam??
Reply
try Magna for top 10% - summa not - summa is a very small percentage, possibly only one person.
You keep going on about 70% from your article which in your article only references C*M Laude! You're spinning this Klarissa and you're being untruthful!
==================================================...
Taken from the WeeklyStandard (won't post a link since I think that's what got me spammed):
The only reason I bring this barely relevant history up is to show what a stud of a law student Barack Obama was. He graduated Harvard magna c*m laude. This was one honor you unquestionably had to earn. It's a very impressive feat. Back in Obama's days at Harvard, more than 50 percent of the class graduated c*m laude, a fact that made graduating "with honors" a meaningless accomplishment. But graduating magna was a different kettle of fish. Barack Obama graduated right near the top of his law school class.
==================================================...
Here's some more info from you straight from Harvard:
http://www.law.harvard.edu/ocs/employers/HLS_Gradi...
Harvard Law School recognizes the achievement of attaining and maintaining high grades through graduation honors. Students who graduate with a general average of 7.20 and above are honored with the distinction of graduating summa c*m laude. The top 10% of the class, excluding summa, are honored with the distinction of graduating magna c*m laude. Finally, the next 30% of the class, after magna are honored with the distinction of graduating c*m laude. -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
77%
andersons1571 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I'm a Democrat but I was hoping for more from Palin. She's not VP material and I'm sure the rest of the world will or already sees that which is another moment of shame for the USA. I was worried on the possible Democratic VP pick until Biden was announced. Palin came in as a "wow" of wonder but now more so as a dud.
Reply -
vrotorComment removed: Spammer, Hard Banned
-
-
vrotorComment removed: Spammer, Hard Banned
-
77%
vlynnf561 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
It is scarey to think Palin could preside over the nation if something happened to McCain. Considering his age, that is a serious consideration. McCain was playing political games choosing her to attract Hillary supporters. That does not show good judgment on his part. That is not the way putting country first!!! Together the ticket spells DISASTER!
Reply -
-
TcarosComment removed: Hard Banned
-
-
80%
purpleicon1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Sarah Palin is not the nice, wholesome hockey mom people think she is. She is ambitious, underhanded, and a prop for the neocons. You can't blame the media or the " Liberals" for her awkward interviews. She wasn't a good choice for Republican VP.
Reply -
70%
Hobe1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Palin a self proclaimed Dog with lipstick. This woman is proud that she shot and Killed an innocent Moose, just like shooting a Cow in a Zoo. Also, she has pictures with the Dead moose to prove that she really killed the defenseless animal?
Reply
Palin is so very proud that she likes to kill animals, skin them and finally eat their Flesh. Husband know as dude enjoys in the same family activity?
Palin is very proud to let all women know that she does not want any woman to have the right to Choose to have an abortion. This will set us women back at least 50 years.
McCain is a 26 year do-nothing corrupt senator as being a member or the Keating five savings and Loan Fraud that Cost hard working American Taxpayers Billions of hard earned dollars.
McCain and Palin two Nuts NOT Qualified to be President and Vice President...
What a Major Disgrace the republican Party could not have selected Honest capable Individuals.
How sad....-
83%
BillieMaxer1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
What scares the hell out of me is how many people in here that really think she is the one for VP, who think she is smart. So where does that put them? Someone said she can really bring in a crowd, that does not say much for the average republican then.
Reply -
100%
DaneL1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Hobe
Reply
"This woman is proud that she shot and Killed an innocent Moose, just like shooting a Cow in a Zoo."
It's plain to see you have never hunted moose. People here in Wyoming, like in Alaska, use moose, elk and deer as a very healthy food source that hasn't been shot up with antibiotics and steriods. Stay in the city and your local butcher shop but don't condemn us for supplying our own food. And I believe the pic was her with a caribou.-
100%
Klarissa1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The program exists in large part because the state's intensive game management law puts a premium on efforts to "restore the abundance or productivity of identified big game prey populations as necessary to achieve human consumptive use goals."
Reply
The "big game prey" in question are the approximately 1 million caribou and 175,000 to 200,000 moose in the state.
Subsistence hunters are a major priority in wildlife management in Alaska, although a subsistence hunter is hard to define.
Clarke offered some statistics: About 20 percent of Alaska's population, or roughly 135,000 people, is classified as rural. About 92 percent to 100 percent of rural Alaskans use wild fish for food to some extent, and 79 percent to 92 percent use wildlife. Palin, herself a hunter, might live in too urban an area to be included in these statistics, but she has said she eats moose and other game.
-
-
-
-
82%
jimsit1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I don't want anyone who kils game from an airplane with a high powered rifle to be in a position to be my President. She has no respect for much else but that mentality that almost obliterated the Buffalo, and all for "sport". Reaaaly!!!
Reply -
82%
bonaroo1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
We shouldn't underestimate the power of contestant number 8 in her swimsuit. Ahmadjinidad would be toast in a swimsuit competition against Palin. Putin would be touogher to beat, especially if he wore red, but if you throw in her flute playing...... watch out.
Reply -
86%
not2needy1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Sarah Palin is waaayyyy tooo full of herself to step down. She's an American beauty, this is her entitlement, just as Johnny is a POW, and a presidency is his entitlement.. The country be damned.. it's all about them! When will we ever learn?
Reply -
78%
pcknowledge1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Some of you are just underestimating Palin and her abilities. McCain is planning to have Palin meet with Ahmedinejad as a "pre condition" for diplomatic talks with Iran. Palin will open a dialogue with Ahmedinejad about home schooling, no sex ed, restricting women's rights to choose...the religious ruling leaders in Iran will love Palin's ideas which are so closely aligned with theirs. And this will be the beginning of our beautiful new friendship with Iran...
Reply-
-
-
TcarosComment removed: Hard Banned
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
TcarosComment removed: Hard Banned
-
-
75%
moxxxxxxxxxx1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Mccains pick of Palin is an insult to all women. Is this his perception of sucessful American women? Is Palin suppose to represent what all Ameican women want? Just exactly what group of women was McCain trying to appeal to by picking Palin? Mccain made a fool out of Palin by asking her to run for a position unprepared. She wasn't even six months post baby delivery.
Reply -
-
-
sailrComment removed: Retracted by user
-
100%
techsupport1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"Too bad your candidate has no thoughts of his own, but he is a good memorizer."
Reply
This could be classified as a primitive Ad Hominem attack, but it is also an example of an argument that is neither provable nor disprovable. At least, not by the person who is making the claim. That makes it a thoroughly unconvincing argument. -
TcarosComment removed: Hard Banned
-
0%
DaneL1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Klarissa
Reply
"wow, I have never seen so many libs in once place before. And some new ones too."
See how afraid they are of her ability to bring a new dimension to this campaign. And instead of relying on the strength of their platform, they are really trying to destroy her. Shows how weak their platform is.
-
-
TcarosComment removed: Hard Banned
-
-
TcarosComment removed: Hard Banned
-
Neutral
BillieMaxer1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I think there will be more people watching them than the presidential debate, due to her Katie Couric episode. I hope she does better just for her sake, not her parties .Its amazing how many people these days dwell on the negative and forget about the positives.I don't think she will win over Biden, I just hope she does better than before.
Reply -
BillieMaxerComment removed: Spam
-
Neutral
JoAnnaVHoffmann1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I find it extremely intersting that people are knocking John McCain's choice of Sarah Palin. What I find most disturbing is the comments that she is just a "heart beat" away from the presidency. What about the known fact of Barack Obama - he smokes - he could easily die of heartattack and what about his choice Joe Biden - he's had heart not once but twice - so if anyone should be concerned we should be concerned that it is more likely that the Speaker of the House could easily be the next President.
Reply -
-
100%
BillieMaxer1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
As a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Obama made official trips to Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. In August 2005, he traveled to Russia, Ukraine, and Azerbaijan. The trip focused on strategies to control the world's supply of conventional weapons, biological weapons, and weapons of mass destruction as a first defense against potential terrorist attacks.<61>
Reply
Following meetings with U.S. military in Kuwait and Iraq in January 2006, Obama visited Jordan, Israel, and the Palestinian territories.
He left for his third official trip in August 2006, traveling to South Africa, Kenya, Djibouti, Ethiopia and Chad. In a nationally televised speech at the University of Nairobi, he spoke forcefully on the influence of ethnic rivalries and corruption in Kenya.
Obama worked with Russ Feingold (D–WI) to eliminate gifts of travel on corporate jets by lobbyists to members of Congress and require disclosure of bundled campaign contributions under the "Honest Leadership and Open Government Act", which was signed into law in September 2007.
He joined Chuck Schumer (D-NY) in sponsoring S. 453, a bill to criminalize deceptive practices in federal elections, including fraudulent flyers and automated phone calls, as witnessed in the 2006 midterm elections.
Obama also introduced the "Iraq War De-Escalation Act", a bill to cap troop levels in Iraq, begin phased redeployment, and remove all combat brigades from Iraq before April 2008.<68>
Later in 2007, Obama sponsored with Kit Bond (R-MO) an amendment to the 2008 Defense Authorization Act adding safeguards for personality disorder military discharges, and calling for a review by the Government Accountability Office following reports that the procedure had been used inappropriately to reduce government costs.
joined Chuck Hagel (R-NE) in introducing legislation to reduce risks of nuclear terrorism.A provision from the Obama-Hagel bill was passed by Congress in December 2007 as an amendment to the State-Foreign Operations appropriations bill.
Obama also sponsored a Senate amendment to the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) to provide one year of job protection for family members caring for soldiers with combat-related injuries. After passing both houses of Congress with bipartisan majorities, SCHIP was vetoed by President Bush in early October 2007, a move Obama said "shows a callousness of priorities that is offensive to the ideals we hold as Americans." -
BillieMaxerComment removed: Spam
-
100%
BillieMaxer1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Amendments, that have all passed:
Reply
S.Amdt.159 to S.Con.Res.18 - To prevent and, if necessary, respond to an international outbreak of the avian flu.
S.Amdt.390 to H.R.1268 - To provide meal and telephone benefits for members of the Armed Forces who are recuperating from injuries incurred on active duty in Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring Freedom.
S.Amdt.670 to H.R.3 - To provide for Flexible Fuel Vehicle (FFV) refueling capability at new and existing refueling station facilities to promote energy security and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
S.Amdt.808 to H.R.6 - To establish a program to develop Fischer-Tropsch transportation fuels from Illinois basin coal.
S.Amdt.851 to H.R.6 - To require the Secretary to establish a Joint Flexible Fuel/Hybrid Vehicle Commercialization Initiative, and for other purposes.
S.Amdt.1362 to S.1042 - To require a report on the Department of Defense Composite Health Care System II.
S.Amdt.1453 to S.1402 - To ensure the protection of military and civilian personnel in the Department of Defense from an influenza pandemic, including an avian influenza pandemic.
S.Amdt.2301 to H.R.3010 - To increase funds to the Thurgood Marshall Legal Educational Opportunity Program and to the Office of Special Education Programs of the Department of Education for the purposes of expanding positive behavioral interventions and supports.
S.Amdt.2605 to S.2020 - Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Federal Emergency Management Agency should immediately address issues relating to no-bid contracting.
S.Amdt.2930 to S.2349 - To clarify that availability of legislation does not include nonbusiness days.
S.Amdt.3144 to S.Con.Res.83 - To provide a $40 million increase in FY 2007 for the Homeless Veterans Reintegration Program and to improve job services for hard-to-place veterans
S. Amdt 41 to S. 1 To require lobbyists to disclose the candidates, leadership PACs, or political parties for whom they collect or arrange contributions, and the aggregate amount of the contributions collected or arranged.
----------------------------------------------
Barack has Written a total of 890 Bills and Co-sponsored Another 1096 since he started serving in the U.S. Senate. -
100%
BillieMaxer1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
THESE ARE BARACK'S ACCOMPLISHMENTS IN THE U.S. SENATE TO DATE:
Reply
** First legislation, the HOPE Act, which increased Pell Grants to $5100, and later joined Senator Kennedy on the Higher Education legislation that passed July 20, by a vote of 78-18. That legislation also included funding for Predominantly Black Colleges to assist with counseling, tutoring and other needs of low income students. It also creates the Teaching Residency Act which will create a school-based teacher preparation program in high needs schools to provide each teacher with a mentor, content instruction, classroom management skills, a master’s degree and state certification, and a 2 year follow-up program.
**The Coburn-Obama Government Transparency Act of 2006
is an act that requires the full disclosure of all entities or organizations receiving federal funds beginning in fiscal year (FY) 2007 on a website maintained by the Office of Management and Budget.
**The Lugar-Obama Nuclear Non-proliferation and Conventional Weapons Threat Reduction Act
Authored by U.S. Sens. Dick Lugar (R-IN) and Barack Obama (D-IL), the Lugar-Obama initiative expands U.S. cooperation to destroy conventional weapons. It also expands the State Department's ability to detect and interdict weapons and materials of mass destruction.
Signed into Law on January 11, 2007.
**The 2007 Government Ethics Bill
** The “Democratic Republic of the Congo Relief, Security, and Democracy Promotion Act.
** S116 - Summer Learning demonstration project to provide summer learning grants and encourage new teaching methods.
http://www.pasesetter.org/demonstrationPrograms/na...
and this one, moved out of committee just a few days ago:
Obama's Global Poverty Act of 2007, passed out of committee just a few days ago
WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senators Barack Obama (D-IL), Chuck Hagel (R-NE), and Maria Cantwell (D-WA) and Congressman Adam Smith (D-WA) today hailed the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's passage of the Global Poverty Act (S.2433), which requires the President to develop and implement a comprehensive policy to cut extreme global poverty in half by 2015 through aid, trade, debt relief, and coordination with the international community, businesses and NGOs. This legislation was introduced in December. Smith and Congressman Spencer Bachus (R-AL) sponsored the House version of the bill (H.R. 1302), which passed the House last September.
http://obama.senate.gov / -
Republicrat1844Comment removed: Retracted by user
loading ...
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.