« Back to story "Congress, White House reach financial bailout deal"

Story Comments

Posted by: berkeley 1 year, 2 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 70%
    berkeley1 year, 2 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    looks like congress caved-in. too bad.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    15 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 50%
      jordan111 year, 2 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      What did they cave in 'to?' What changes were made from the original request of Paulen/bush? Were taxpayer protections put in? Does Palen get a blank check? Will wall street have to pay taxpayers back? Anyone seen the revision?

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      11 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • 50%
        HateKoolAid1 year, 2 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        I hear they did away with Section 8. At least I hope they did.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        5 Replies

        loading loading ...
        • 60%
          jordan111 year, 2 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Oh yes, no oversight. Well, that's a good thing. Nice of them to share with voters what they're doing. Or maybe they have, and I missed it.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply

          4 Replies

          loading loading ...
          • 75%
            jordan111 year, 2 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Is someone just going along giving negatives, or am I missing something here?

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply

            3 Replies

            loading loading ...
            • 100%
              HateKoolAid1 year, 2 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              Cons, they always do. Ignore them and keep speaking your mind. Don't let them discourage you.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply

              2 Replies

              loading loading ...
              • 50%
                Endoscopy1 year, 2 months ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                They are the ones that wanted more control and accountability. At the start the Democrats were going along with the Bush proposal. Then McCain said they should listen to the House Republicans. Then the email came in 100 to 1 against it as it stood. I guess McCain was right again. Too bad libs.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply

                1 Reply

                loading loading ...
                • Neutral
                  jordan111 year, 2 months ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  Are you in your right mind? "Too bad libs?" You really don't get any of this, do you.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                  Reply
                  loading loading ...
        • 50%
          protoham1 year, 2 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Go back and read the story.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply

          3 Replies

          loading loading ...
          • 100%
            jordan111 year, 2 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Still, the resolution could be vetoed by the president, meaning it would take extra-large congressional majorities to stop it.>>>>

            So oversight is subject to veto's? And compensation of over $500,000 is subject to stiff taxes? How stiff? This means CEO's could walk away with millions in taxpayer dollars, even after paying 'stiff taxes' with money that isn't theirs anyway? I've got a headache.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply

            2 Replies

            loading loading ...
            • 0%
              Endoscopy1 year, 2 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              But the government will own the mortgages. We want the government to be in the mortgage business don't we. Just look at all the foreclosures we can get and then own a lot of homes.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply

              1 Reply

              loading loading ...
              • Neutral
                jordan111 year, 2 months ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                At least taxpayers would have some collateral for their money.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply
                loading loading ...
          • 100%
            berkeley1 year, 2 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            the very worst part of all these lies relate to speed, with bush and paulson lying about total doom if congress doesn't act immediately.

            so all day and night sunday, the scribes are going to be writing the details of the bill, and monday, congress is expected to pass it. once again, they will be voting on something none of them have had time to even read, much less think about, or amend.

            this still stinks to high heaven.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
          • 0%
            mark-stevens1 year, 2 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            ...also any profits from selling those houses will go to illegal immigrant housing and the ACLU!!

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply

            2 Replies

            loading loading ...
            • 100%
              HateKoolAid1 year, 2 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              That's interesting.I've got to see the final draft to see where it says that the ACLU is entitled to receive some of the 700 billion.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply

              1 Reply

              loading loading ...
              • 0%
                mark-stevens1 year, 2 months ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                Profit from selling the houses, not buying the houses, is what I had said!

                Interesting... I also hate KooL Aid, that saved me in Jones Town

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply
                loading loading ...

          Post Reply

          You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

          People Who Liked This Comment (7)

          People Who Didn't Like This Comment (3)

          Submit a Story

          Advertisement

          Story Tags ?

          house deal white_house congress reached pelosi bailout_plan 700_billion bush financial white_house

          Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

          Real Estate Info

          Get the Latest Market Info for Your Area



          Foreclosures | Short Sale

          Luxury Homes | Homes for Sale

          First Time Home Buyer Advice



          Also Dropping This Article

          No one has dropped this story.

          Also Submitted By

          view all »