Story Comments
Posted by: berkeley 1 year, 2 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-

berkeley1 year, 2 months ago
-

jordan111 year, 2 months ago
-
-
-
-
-

Endoscopy1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
They are the ones that wanted more control and accountability. At the start the Democrats were going along with the Bush proposal. Then McCain said they should listen to the House Republicans. Then the email came in 100 to 1 against it as it stood. I guess McCain was right again. Too bad libs.
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
-

jordan111 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Still, the resolution could be vetoed by the president, meaning it would take extra-large congressional majorities to stop it.>>>>
Reply
So oversight is subject to veto's? And compensation of over $500,000 is subject to stiff taxes? How stiff? This means CEO's could walk away with millions in taxpayer dollars, even after paying 'stiff taxes' with money that isn't theirs anyway? I've got a headache.
-
-

berkeley1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
the very worst part of all these lies relate to speed, with bush and paulson lying about total doom if congress doesn't act immediately.
Reply
so all day and night sunday, the scribes are going to be writing the details of the bill, and monday, congress is expected to pass it. once again, they will be voting on something none of them have had time to even read, much less think about, or amend.
this still stinks to high heaven.
-
-
-
People Who Didn't Like This Comment (3)
Submit a Story
Advertisement

loading ...
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.