Story Comments

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

Name calling huh? Must be a liberal. So with this long explanation of half this and half that and environment and millions of years and stuff, like Obama your mama would say is "above my pay grade", just give us an example of this half thingys or whatever. Just one example. Oh yes, for you and all the other very intelligents out there, a theory is a theory and can be used to build upon when fact present themselves. But what happens to a theory when after many, many years, there are still no facts to support the theory? As a matter of fact, but of course it is just facts, there has been proof over and over that the theory of evolution could not have happened. That is why the "Theory" has changed over and over and over and over again. Every part of the evolution theory has been proven wrong. Yet they still teach it in the schools. Why do you think all these smart Liberal professors in Berkley, and other so called institutes of learning , will not debate Dr Holvin? Not one! Well, here's my theory, "How can you debate the truth, with a defunct theory?" You must be a young one, fresh out of the brain altering public school system. Now give me some fact to support your theory or bow down and accept that you are actually the second word in you response.

1 Reply