« Back to story "McCain Campaign Blames Obama for the Bailout Bill Failure"

Story Comments

Posted by: RedRiverJ 1 year, 2 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 25%
    RedRiverJ1 year, 2 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Yes, perhaps if McCain were a community organizer he'd be more qualified to be President.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    8 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 75%
      GWHayduke1 year, 2 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Think of that one all by yourself, Duke?

      Didnt think so.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
      • 13%
        RedRiverJ1 year, 2 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        all by my self GW.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
      • 85%
        mesodude1 year, 2 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        But on January 13 of this year, you pointed out here on Propeller John McCain's "abysmal record on immigration" (one of the main reasons you cons didn't want McCain to be your Presidential nominee). Now, after you and your fellow cons assembled for your thoroughly disgusting daily anti-McCain gangbangs (a scary thought no matter how you look at it) all is forgiven. Why? Is it not because you're desperate and fearful cons who want to keep anyone who calls himself a Republican in the White House, Red?I'm fairly sure that's why. And what does this say about the average con's credibility and integrity? Exactly... It's pretty much non-existent, right? ;-(

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        4 Replies

        loading loading ...
        • 18%
          RedRiverJ1 year, 2 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          mesodude
          you said Is it not because you're desperate and fearful cons who want to keep anyone who calls himself a Republican in the White House, Red? I'm fairly sure that's why.
          I hope you have another job, being a physic isn't going to make you wealthy.
          I vote for person not party. Right now I am very disgusted with the crooks on both sides of the aisle. Greed is why we are where we are and it's NOT one party's fault, there is blame on both sides.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply

          3 Replies

          loading loading ...
          • 85%
            tchef1 year, 2 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            The Republican party has been in control and has spread most of the greed. It's time to give them the boot.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • 88%
              mesodude1 year, 2 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              "I vote for person not party. Right now I am very disgusted with the crooks on both sides of the aisle. Greed is why we are where we are and it's NOT one party's fault, there is blame on both sides."

              Of course you support the person. What else would you say? Puh-leeze. You despise McCain and we both know it. I don't have to be a psychic to remember what cons have been saying about McCain since Bush told them what to think in 2000. I don't need to read your tiny minds to remember that McCain's campaign flatlined last year and that wingnuts wanted to burn him at the stake for his immigration platform support alone--up until the time mainstream cons chose him as the GOP nominee, that is. Who do you think you're talking to? Do you actually think no one remembers what lying, opportunistic cons were saying about McCain before you realized he was the best your party has to offer?

              And I don't believe you're disgusted with the crooks "on both sides" for one hot second. Why do cons and faux Independents always spout that lie? You don't demonstrate any such parity in your posts and I DON'T BELIEVE YOU so stop wasting your keystrokes lying (when we both know you're clearly biased).

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply

              1 Reply

              loading loading ...
              • 100%
                robear1 year, 2 months ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                remember that add that rove.inc ran that said mccain fathered a black child with an african american woman? and now were all best buddies in the GOP!!! :D

                funny how things work

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply
                loading loading ...
          • 88%
            Will13131 year, 2 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            he might be more in touch with the problems that average Americans face daily..

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply
            loading loading ...

          Post Reply

          You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

          People Who Liked This Comment (5)

          People Who Didn't Like This Comment (15)