« Back to story "Palin: Obama is Palling Around with Terrorists"

Story Comments

Posted by: UnusualSuspect 1 year, 3 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 100%
    UnusualSuspect1 year, 3 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    LOL...

    Ms Palin is now the attack dog...she showed us that she can memorize talking points when given a week and a half to study them (I'm sure I could, too, and I'm not even into politics and government) and yet not recall a single Supreme Court case other than Roe v Wade or recall a single publication she reads for information.

    Republicans fall back on this kind of tactic when they know they're losing, and this year is no different.

    Happened to McCain himself back in 2000, running against Bush, and in 2004 against Kerry and the swiftboaters. So it's no surprise Ms Palin, coming off a decent recital of talking points (but ever so weak on substance) is doing this.

    The Republicans are getting desperate; 4 weeks to go, they're probably getting low on money, and they're behind, as of today, 10.5.08, in every major national poll, with the average spread of +5.9 percentage points. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls/

    I expect it to get worse...who knows what garbage they'll try to bring up and try to pass it off as legitimate.

    They can only try, but in the end it will hurt themselves...

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    4 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 0%
      DeauxNut1 year, 3 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      You missed her interview after the debate where she named several pulications she reads and also some of the court cases she named other that R v W. She also explained why she didn't name these in the Couric interview. Get a grip and pay attention to the news a little closer.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      2 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        UnusualSuspect1 year, 3 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Well of course she did, Deaux...she had almost a week to think up the answers...LOL....

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
      • 100%
        SantaCruzKidd1 year, 3 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        UnusualSuspect, you know what time it is, brother. Nice articulation and a well intended message. Well received!

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...

      Post Reply

      You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

      People Who Liked This Comment (7)

      People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)

      No one voted this comment negatively.