Story Comments
Posted by: Jaydee40 1 year, 1 month ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
71%
Jaydee401 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
There can be no moral high ground without justice and retribution, in other words the shrub and his gang of thugs in prison or hung plus all the money they made confiscated and put back into repairing what they distorted, at home and abroad. America has lost any creditability they had world wide, only a accountability and remorse will win it back. It's time the American people accept their responsibility it bringing down their corrupt government and I don't mean at the polls as that is only a farce, neither side of this election will bring those responsible to justice so who cares who wins!!
Reply-
22%
reidgator1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
(1) What good is credibility from our "allies" if they are too cowardly or incompetent to accomplish anything? The UN is complete joke. A waste of time and USA money!
Reply
The only groups we need credibility with are our "enemies" - those that would do us harm. I would prefer they RESPECT us, but, if not, then, they should FEAR us. Thanks to Reagan and Clinton, the USA had little credibility from our enemies. Remember the attacks against our personnel (Lebanon in 1983, WTC in 1993, US embassies in Africa (1998?), USS Cole in 2000. How many died because we had no credibility.
At least Bush restord that credibility.
(2) Why should the US accept any responsibility for its actions. In recent years, what country has been forced to accept responsibility for its actions? (Except Iraq in 1991) Look aroudn the world, There is so much corruption, oppression, genocide, greed, yada, yada. This whole world is a joke. To those that criticize the USA, I ask, "Just what the F are YOU doing to help solve these problems?"
Your post suggests that all of the wortld's problem can be solved if America atones itself. Just what drugs are you taking???-
56%
Jaydee401 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
What other first world country makes up lies to invade and steal third world and second world countries? The US is in a league if it's own when it comes to corruption and hypocrisy, the US has been making up lies to justify it's actions since the American Revolution and the American public has been eating it up. When will the American public wake UP? What USA money are you talking about as far as the UN goes, they have been behind in their dues and commitments for decades and what little "aid" they do give is it military weapons that just end up killing more civilians, stop falling for BS propaganda and look into the reality. You can talk about so called attacks on the US all you want but the simple truth is if the US kept it's nose out of other counties affairs they would not get it bloodied so often, you bring it on yourself.
Reply -
73%
wtagg1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
How exactly has Bush restored credibility as far a foreign policy goes? Do we lead in that area? If our enemies think our military, foreign policy, and world presence should command respect, why are we scurrying around like idiots whenever someone brings a q-tip or water bottle on an airplane Our leaders have no ability to look forward past the minute they are living in.
Reply
Our problem is we no longer lead. You are suggesting we act as everyone else, thus the conclusion that you do not want us to lead. Will the world's problems be solved by the US changing its current foreign policy? Probably not, but we would surely not be piling on or wasting huge amounts of our tax dollars on efforts that bring back nothing to this country.
I ask you the question of why is the US in the business of trying to solved the world's problems? I am not advocating a isolationist point of view, but our current effort outside this country has been horrible. How anyone can say that Rice or even Powell did a good job (or even a marginally acceptable one) is incredible.-
57%
Jaydee401 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I agree 100%, US foreign policy has run the country for years putting the Average American citizen at a disadvantage for decades. The only reason for this is so rich companies can make profits and fill their pockets. Look at the lack of funding for infrastructure that led to the lose of life in the US over the years. Many communities need federal money but if it was a choice between weapons or better schools, hospitals and food we all know where the money will go. Another thing is the wealth that the US once had is gone but the government will not admit it to the people, instead they lie in the hopes of pinning it on the next administration. The truth is the government has been printing to much money for years to pay for military spending instead of for the good of its people.
Reply -
13%
reidgator1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
wtagg,
Reply
Your post is one of the most intelligent ones I have read in a while! You ask some good questions! Will do my best to answer:
PART 1
(1) "How exactly has Bush restored credibility as far a foreign policy goes?"
He hasn't. And I do not want him to. When I look at the rest of the "western world", I really do not care about their respect for us. They do not have mine, that's for sure. "In an insane world, the sane man will appear insane!"
(2) "why are we scurrying around like idiots whenever someone brings a q-tip or water bottle on an airplane?"
Good point. But, that is OUR fault. We place WAY, WAY TOO MUCH blame on the office of president. The people will never forgive Bush if another hijacking occurs.
A few points to bolster my position:
a) Bush has been blamed by many, especially the liberal environmentalists, for the rejection of the Kyoto Treaty. The problem is this: the US SENATE approves treaties. And the US SENATE rejected the Kyoto treaty 98-0!
That's right. Every senator that voted (R or D) rejected the treaty. So, why does Bush get blamed for it?
b) The current mortgage crisis: this is a world-wide problem. Do we blame Bush for the struggles in Germany and Belgium? And the root cause of this problem dates back into the Clinton administration. (and the Republican Congress)
c) Even Jack Krugman (columnist for the NYT) admits that the recession Bush inherited in 2001 was not his fault. Then, along came 9/11 and the obvious economic impact, and we want to blame Bush. Manufacturing jobs have been going overseas for 20 years. Perot warned us in 1992. So, why do we blame Bush?
(3) "Our current effort outside this country has been horrible."
The results have been less than desired, but, why have our efforts been horrible? 4000 dead? We lost more than that in one day EACH on Normandy, Okinawa, and Iwo Jima. Were those efforts "horrible"?
Iraqis can now vote. Schools & hospitals are being built. Yes, Iraq has suffered much. But, ask them, would they rather go back to the way things were in 2002?-
86%
Jaydee401 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
1 Thats the American way right? The US economy screwed and the US military combat ineffective but who needs friend or allies? New flash sparky the US needs us more than we need you, look at what you import vrs what you export.
Reply
2 Many people blame the shrub for 9/11 and there is much support there for that, many documents point right to the intelligence community and white house for having full knowledge prior to 9/11. All bush has done is to lie and cover up so why the impression he has done anything? America is weaker at home than anytime in it's history, if someone wanted to spread terror in US cities it would be happening. but clearly that is not the case.
As to the mortgage "crisis" it is not the world wide problem you put forward, it only happened in countries that don't have regulations letting lenders make up their own rules up in sub prime mortgages.
Why blame the shrub for jobs going overseas? How about it's the governments job to keep the country strong financially and competitive in the world market. Since the Underachieving shrub took office the US dollar has lost almost fifty percent of it's worth, that means a company once worth 600 million US is now only worth 300 US while most companies from other counties that had the opposite happen, ones that were once worth 300 million are now worth 600 million US. The average lifestyle around the world has soared all over the world but within the US as a result of this. People in countries all over the world now have disposable income like never before and are traveling and spending while Americans are doing without in greater numbers all thanks to the global shift in wealth since the shrub took office.
3 Clearly you have not lost a child as one of those 4000, if you had you would not have made such callous remarks and don't dare to compare Normandy or Okinawa with the Crimes of Iraq or Afghanistan,-
0%
reidgator1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
(1) The fact that we import more than export is evidence that YOU need us more than we need you. YOUR lousy economies would not survive without our purchases. We proved during WW2 to have the most powerful manufacturing base in the world. Do we still have that? Nah, but, we can regain it. And the liberals deserve most of the blame for us losing it.
Reply
(2) You’re a liar. No evidence that Bush & Co has “full knowledge” of the attacks. They were warned by Clinton’s administration that something was pending, that the threat was real, but, details of what, where, and when were nonexistent! Just what do you suggest Bush should have done to prevent the attacks?
Technically, you are correct. The world-wide problem involves economies in general. The mortgage crisis is limited to “western countries”. BTW – if we need you, then, why does our economic slump affect YOURS?
Regarding lax regulations, the Republicans (and McCain) expressed concern about Fannie Mae, etc and attempted to tighten the rules. Democrats said NO!
You wrote: “How about it's the governments job to keep the country strong financially and competitive in the world market”
Do not disagree, but, I repose the question, “Why blame Bush?”
a) Jobs have been going overseas for 20 years. Yet you only want to blame Bush. You have a myopic view of the situation.
b) Bush is not THE government. What about Congress that passes laws and places burdens on American companies making it difficult to compete in a global market? What about local laws and regulations? My company closed a plant, laying off 1400 people (including me) because it could not compete in global economy. Environmental regs were ridiculous. Examples: Our water discharge had to meet standards that were so high, that water coming out of the ground could not meet. We were effectively cleaning up the water. The standards for particulates in the air inside the plant were as tight for our equipment as those Japan required for their employees! Plant existed for 40 years, no evidence of health problems from operations, but, we were forced to spend $30,000,000 to improve conditions. That is why we could not compete with Japan and Korea.
c) yes – there has been a shift in global wealth. However, it began BEFORE bush too office.
Again, why do you blame Bush for all of this? BECAUSE YOU WANT TO! It is easier to blame one person at the top rather than blame everyone underneath. It was easier to blame Hitler than hold all of Germany responsible for WW2 and the Holocaust!
(3) To compare Iraq with Normandy and Iwo Jima is not callous. It is objective!
You ignore the 3000 families who lost loved ones on 9/11.
Since March of 2003, the city of Detroit has had more than 4000 murders.
Each year, we lose 40,000 in car accidents. That is simply stating a fact and keeping things in perspective.
For you to ignore those other deaths makes YOU callous.-
75%
Jaydee401 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Wow Good attempt at redirecting blame, fifty percent of US wealth gone because of one administrations actions and you don't think the leader is to blame? No other country has had their currency fall by the same margin as the US, on the contrary the rest of the world has stead consistent while the US lost, why could that be? In your attempt to rewrite current events you hide the facts and discredit the truth but not everyone falls for it, I don't and others don't as well.
Reply
My economics are fine sparky, with the rest of the world having a raise in their standard of living why not sell to them and make more money than to the US? Yes they are farther to ship to but their currency keeps it's value unlike the Greenback. Everything we sell is used and needed on the world market, not just the US, remember that.
Don't seem to remember any problem with sub prime mortgages here but our banking system is regulated thankfully so that could be why.
How did I ignore the 3000 plus dead from 9/11 which the government knew full well about prior to 9/11? Or the over 4000 dead in the middle east in a conflict that is based on lies, to die for a cause is one thing but to die for lies and deceit is a tragedy, nothing more, nothing less. Your comparison is a insult to everything history has taught us, you seem to be trying to say that the Iraqi's are better off now to be in the most violent part of the world unable to defend themselves at a time when they need it most. That is the US doings and nobody else's.
Nice story about environmental laws taking jobs away but lets look at facts, last year when Chinese factories were recalling toys with lead paint nobody said they needed jobs, lets overlook this did they? Fact is as first world countries we need to lead the world at cleaning up our environment and that comes with a price, it US companies want to take their manufacturing of shore then tax their products when the come into the country so it's not an option. Your going to have to pay more but at least the jobs would be there for you and your kids.
-
-
-
-
-
0%
reidgator1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Wtagg,
Reply
Your post is one of the most intelligent ones I have read in a while!
You ask some good questions! Will do my best to answer:
(continued) PART 2
(4) "Our problem is we no longer lead. You are suggesting we act as everyone else" plus your other questions & points.
Not really. I was essentially asking why was the poster holding the USA to a standard that no other country was being held to.
I want the US to do what is best for the US. But, to your point, we can not be isolationist. Doing what is best for us does not mean abandoning the rest of the world. As the wealthiest nation on earth, we do have a moral responsibility to help those in need. Are you suggesting that we should have stayed out of Europe in 1944?
NOTE - in Dec 1941, the prevailing opinion in the USA was to defeat Japan first, leave Europe to suffer/fight its own war with Hitler. After Japan is defeated, then, we can address Hitler. However, Hitler forced our hand when Germany declared war against the US.
We do need to lead, but, what if the rest of the world does not wish to follow?
Some things we should still do even if the rest of the world does not follow. However, some things would be stupid if attempted without the support and agreement of the rest of the world. Example: the Kyoto treaty. It would allow China and India to continue putting tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Industries would just move their operations to those countries. In other words, our economy would suffer for no benefit!
Being a leader means being willing to be unpopular.
Remember, the Brits voted Churchill out of office in 1944 (over concerns about their economy), only to vote him back in the next election. So the problem of a fickle citizenry is not limited to the USA!
I am OK with the US being unpopular, especially in a world that does not care about genocide. BTW - are you aware that Muslims in Kosovo supported our invasion of Iraq? They were proud that we led there! And you can not deny that we are leading, even if the rest of the world is too cowardly and apathetic to follow.
Should we try to solve the world's problems? Why not at least try? There is a limit to what we can do. And I will admit that Iraq may have been too big of a problem for us to tackle. Or, maybe if the liberals showed some character and morals and backed the efforts, at least the idea of helping Iraq, then, there would have been less resistance on the part of Bush and Rumsfeld to make some necessary changes to the war strategy.
Tell me - why is Afghanistan any more a "good war" than Iraq?
BTW - it is interesting that Obbie supports the efforts in Afghanistan, which we are losing (and per a Brit commander, can not win), while the efforts in Iraq (denounced by Obbie) are succeeding.-
Neutral
wtagg1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"As the wealthiest nation on earth, we do have a moral responsibility to help those in need." = Socialism. If we are going to pursue a socialist path, which I am completely against, we should do it at home. We have more of a *moral* duty here than outside our borders. This conflicts with your I don't care what others think stance.
Reply
You see Kyoto as a glass lacking opportunity. I see it full of opportunity. Green business and alternative energy are the opportunities of leadership and financial gain. Lead in these areas and we'll be exporting energy and energy technology and have others beholden to us vs. the other way around. It is funny that you don't care what others think, but you use others as examples. I think you need to become consistent. Either care or don't.
Are you aware that republicans did not support our efforts in Kosovo? Ironically, Clinton did not lose one service man or woman to hostile action in that entire effort. Maybe the admin should have taken him on as a military adviser. On the other hand, the Somalia effort was terrible and can be blamed on Clinton. On the bright side, he was smart enough to see a situation that was untenable and never ending. He got out.
"Should we try to solve the world's problems?" = elitism. Who are we to dictate solutions. Considering our record in this area, the only rationale for a country to accept help would be for the money and materials. I'm not sure you want me to point out our successes in this area. It isn't pretty.
9/11 originated in Afghanistan. That effort was in direct response to the event and needs to be concluded. Iraq was something the admin wanted. There has not been a valid rationale for us to invade. DR, DC, and GB wanted Iraq on 9/12. They were warned by Powell that that would be ill-advised. They decided to wait until enough *evidence* could be provided. The quality of that evidence cast suspicions upon the timing and motive for the invasion.
-
-
-
-
loading ...
Ratskii
chuck-the-canuck
not2needy
sailr
Goppy
PsychoHosebeast
blowback
dissent
epiphannyy
Klarissa
iatcnc
Progressive
redtomato
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.