Story Comments
Posted by: BB64 1 year, 1 month ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-

BB641 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
If the banking failures are truly only a Republican caused problem, where are the congressional hearings? Where is the rage from little Nancy and Harry? That's easy. Freddie and Fanny were huge money pits for the DNC operatives. Silence is a very good indication that this is a DNC caused problem.
Reply-

dunkirk1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
ROFLMAO, so you;re saying the Dems did this all the while the Repugsa controlled the govt?? So I want to elect someone who cant see a monay scam happening whe4n they control ALL legislation??? Its more the other way around, the Repubs HELD ALL THE Power (you always said the Dems have no power did tht change??) so now that the failed policies of the REPUIBLICANS are being shown fo rwhat they are you trty spinnig it into a Dem problem?? ROFLMAO.
Reply-

BB641 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I'm not saying the GOP has some accountability here but the problems with the banking started when the anti-red lining of the 70's became part of the mainstream lefty policies. Again I ask, if the DNC wasn't hiding something why wouldn't there be hearings already? This deal was little more than a cover up.
Reply-

quackpot1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The start was a good one, but some time during the past seven-plus years of republican control of congress and administration, it accelerated to become too fast to be sustained.
Reply
Good start + push too hard = fall on the face = disaster of a finish.
Hint: look at the BIG SHOVE, not the start. -

hamy1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Um...what about when the republicans were in charge just a year and a half ago? Why didn't they stop it? If it was stoppable for the democrats, why didn't the republicans stop it before? It can't be about filibusters because they threatened to take away the filibuster last time the democrats didn't agree with them. It must have to do with their OWN money.
Reply
Your point is moot.
-
-
-

mesodude1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"If the banking failures are truly only a Republican caused problem, where are the congressional hearings? Where is the rage from little Nancy and Harry? "
Reply
A) Republicans controlled Congress from the early 90s til a couple of years ago and a Republican President has been in the White House for the last 8 years. If the shoe fits...
B)You really have NO idea what your Congress is doing, do you? -

donald511 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Remember the "Do Nothing" Repug Congress that did nothing after the Enron and Worldcom debacles? Hastert putting the House on only a 4 day work week, and doing nothing after either the Foley Pedophile or Abramoff scandals!
Reply
Lehman testifying yesterday and getting torn up!
Forget that the Bush DoJ doesn't even back up congressional subpoenas to boot?
-
People Who Liked This Comment (14)
People Who Didn't Like This Comment (14)
Submit a Story
Advertisement

loading ...
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.