« Back to story "SCANDAL: A Reporter Accuses Palin of Racism -- and Gives Us a Glimpse Into His Own Prejudices"

Story Comments

Posted by: not2needy 1 year, 2 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

80%
not2needy1 year, 2 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

I agree. This site is supposed to be for the Propeller community, REAL MEMBERS, and just because someone happens to read the article off the internet, NOT PROPELLER, shouldn't affect the number of reads on Propeller.

If it's not the general public reading articles off the internet that's boosting the reads, rather than through Propeller, then there's something very stinky on Propeller. If they can't regulate the reads to the Propeller community and only credit the reads that are actually clicked on through the propeller submission, then the reads feature needs to go.

Anyone who hasn't been banned has the right to join Propeller, submit, comment, prop, and participate at will. But people who read articles just because they go to Huffington, Yahoo or WSJ etc, off the internet, reading the articles shouldn't count as a read on Propeller!

This is the understanding i am getting. Regardless of who reads the articles, from what source, and whether they are a member of propeller or not, their read counts on Propeller. I take issue with that,, if that's the case.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
0 Replies

loading ...