« Back to story "The Bailout Passes! Now What?"

Story Comments

Posted by: Wolfie2007 1 year, 2 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • Neutral
    Wolfie20071 year, 2 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    "Bills should be clean, of single purpose, and given straight up or down roll call votes, no more voting “present” to weasel out of taking a position. No buying votes for weak, uncertain or even dangerous legislation such as this bailout bill or the laws that Congress has passed over the years that have brought us to this apparent point-of-no-return."

    I'm all for this suggestion being implemented but the biggest problem we face is getting Congress to pass a law to enact it. It's always a catch 22 when dealing with our Congress.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      chevydog1 year, 2 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I have to agree. One of the things I've long disliked is the practice of adding unrelated stuff to bills to get them to pass. It's usually used for budget resolutions; but nothing is really immune from it. It makes a mockery of what politics is supposed to be--the mutual altering of positions to get something in the end that is partly acceptable to all concerned parties.

      For whatever reasons (mixed I'm sure), a large number of Representitives from both parties decided that the initial bill wasn't acceptable for the purposes that it was supposed to achieve. The bill as passed by the Senate did very little if anything to address this situation; IMHO our Senators did not do what they were elected to do.

      I think that if a proposal has merit, it can stand or fall on that. I guess that i narrowly supported the objective of the original bill as unpassed by the House; though I would have preferred to see more deliberative time taken and a few more conditions applied. I hope that what we have now will work as predicted. But I'm not sure that even if it does that the price wasn't too high.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        BOLYER271 year, 2 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        I didn't like the power it gives our government. Now the treasury sec. and the board (which consist's of the people that got us here) now can spend the money as they see fit. When decision's are made no justice system, no government board, no people can ever question or try them for there (careless and bias) decision's on who and what get the "$700B" if things go south. I did not like the scare tactics of both the bush admin. and the dem's in congress. They played right into Bush's plan. I think we need to clean house in all branches. I hope the AMERICAN PEOPLE do not sit back and let there government walk all over them again like they did last week.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...

    Post Reply

    You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

    People Who Liked This Comment (0)

    No one voted this comment positively. Is it really that bad of a comment?

    People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)

    No one voted this comment negatively.