Story Comments

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

If Bush is the President, and Commander in Chief, then yes. He spent the first 4 years blaming everything he failed at on Clinton. In another 4 the excuses are thin. He was elected to correct things and failure to do so is his blame. Being the Top Executive, the decision maker, for the nation's business is what he was elected for. Think about all the power Bush and Cheney grabbed, they have no excuse for not having their policy done. The congress is there to represent the people, to prevent a decider from overdoing it, having been given the collective power to override 'an' Executive decision. So blame all of the congress, if any, but remember the Rubber Stamp years back to even Clinton. When are you unwilling to hold this President accountable for not doing a good job? Let's do this the other way, say why the President isn't accountable. Please say what did he do that benefited the middle or working class (never mind the poor). AIG failed, how did he sit back, like Katrina, and not take responsibility for the fallout? Fannie Mae is his fault too, he has the power and resources to know and act though the Congress has oversight. Is the nation protected? I said several times, never mind the Middle East terrorist, we have 'W' to destroy the nation economically from with-in.

0 Replies