« Back to story "Voter Registration Group ACORN Long a Target of GOP Operatives"

Story Comments

Posted by: Grrr 1 year, 1 month ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

80%
Grrr1 year, 1 month ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

I seem to recall that the GOP coup d'etat of the American Republic actually occurred back in 2000. Reinforced in 2004. 2008 -- more of the same. If the poll margins are so extreme come November that they can't steal it believably, something will occur that will cause the election to be "postponed". If that happens, see you in DC. You bring the torch, I've got a pitchfork.

Stay tuned, if they'll let you.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
11 Replies

loading ...
- 84%
  not2needy1 year, 1 month ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  I'm with you Grrr, they can't just keep doing this sh!t and getting away with it.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  10 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - DanmLiberalsComment removed: Retracted by user6 Replies
    - 89%
      ConsAreNonGrata1 year, 1 month ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      "Bill Ayers--- Obama sat on board with him. Had no problem with sitting on board of murderer and man who steps on American flags for fun."
      
      There you go again, Cons.
      
      http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/taking_lib...
      
      In fact, nobody died as a result of bombings in which Ayers said he participated as part of the Weather Underground, at the New York City Police Headquarters in 1970, in a men's lavatory in the Capitol building in 1971 and in a women's restroom in the Pentagon in 1972. The deaths to which Clinton referred were of three Weather Underground members who died when their own "bomb factory" exploded in a Greenwich Village townhouse on March 6, 1970. Ayers was not present. Also, two police officers were murdered in connection with the robbery of a Brinks armored car by Weather Underground members in 1981. That was about a year after Ayers had turned himself in and after all charges against him had been dropped.
      ---
      
      Why, Why, WHY must you LIE, Cons?
      
      If you're going to try and "Saddam" Obama, Cons, you need to make sure we cannot find intel on the matter. Get it?
      
      And how was Ayers standing on the flag when his feet CANNOT BE SEEN in that photo.
      
      Maybe you need to worry about your own intelligence in comparison to your sac hair, Cons, before you worry about others, eh?
      
      Lies are facts when they are used for smearing opponents in the Con Culture of Lies and Incompetence.
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      4 Replies
      
      loading ...
      - DanmLiberalsComment removed: Retracted by user2 Replies
        
        75%
        ConsAreNonGrata1 year, 1 month ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        You repeated the same lie about Ayers being a murderer and produced a second picture where again you cannot see Ayer's feet.
        
        Was there really a need to compound your folly, Cons?
        
        At least have the decency to remove the outright lies from your cut & pastes. Or is this a cry for help?
        
        Cons, they just help but engage in self pwnage in the Con Culture of Lies and Incompetence.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        chuck-the-canuck1 year, 1 month ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        It appears that you have a lot in common with your republican brethren. You are just another poor looser. I can hardly wait until after the election. Will there be wailing and gnashing of teeth, or will you all just slither back under your rocks?
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
      - 100%
        dunkirk1 year, 1 month ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        When you read a Con post indicating lies and corruption by the Dems one thing you notice clearly is a lack of corroborating evidence, i.e. NO LINK. The Republicans have a history of slander and hearsay attacks.; What they fail to realize is people arent buying it anymore. Economic meltdown seems to speak volumes to the ability of the repugs to get shepard the nation.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
    - Neutral
      Grrr1 year, 1 month ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      You are the dumbass. And a d!ckhead, to boot.
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      0 Replies
      
      loading ...
  - 0%
    bigurn1 year, 1 month ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    Yes, if we lose a legal election, let's burn the place to the ground. Intimidate others into letting us have our way, despite democratic principles which suggest otherwise.
    
    There's a new book out called "Slouching Toward Socialism". Perhaps you've read it?
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    2 Replies
    
    loading ...
    - 83%
      Charlson1 year, 1 month ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      Your premis is faulty when you use the words "legal election". We're discussing "illegal elections". Now if you'd said the legal election process was illegally manipulated, then I'd agree with you 100%.
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      0 Replies
      
      loading ...
    - 75%
      hyperbola1 year, 1 month ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      Well bigurn, we have known for sure for several years now that the US Supreme Court not only violated that Constitution in 2000, but also awarded the presidency to a fraud. Remember the repubs assualting the polling stations then?
      
      From Research in Review Magazine, Florida State University, Fall/Winter 2005:
      
      Al Gore really did beat George W. Bush in 2000.
      
      ... It’s an embarrassing outcome for George Bush because it showed that Gore had gotten more votes. Everybody had thought that the chads were where all the bad ballots were, but it turned out that the ones that were the most decisive were write-in ballots where people would check Gore and write Gore in, and the machine kicked those out. There were 175,000 votes overall that were so-called “spoiled ballots.” About two-thirds of the spoiled ballots were over-votes; many or most of them would have been write-in over-votes, where people had punched and written in a candidate’s name. And nobody looked at this, not even the Florida Supreme Court in the last decision it made requiring a statewide recount. Nobody had thought about it except Judge Terry Lewis, who was overseeing the statewide recount when it was halted by the U.S. Supreme Court. The write-in over-votes have really not gotten much attention. Those votes are not ambiguous. When you see Gore picked and then Gore written in, there’s not a question in your mind who this person was voting for. When you go through those, they’re unambiguous: Bush got some of those votes, but they were overwhelmingly for Gore. For example, in an analysis of the 2.7 million votes that had been cast in Florida’s eight largest counties, The Washington Post found that Gore’s name was punched on 46,000 of the over-vote ballots it, while Bush’s name was marked on only 17,000....
      
      http://www.rinr.fsu.edu/winter2005/features/battle...
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      0 Replies
      
      loading ...

Post Reply

You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

People Who Liked This Comment (20)

People Who Didn't Like This Comment (5)

Submit a Story

Advertisement