« Back to story "Propeller Week In Review: October 10, 2008"

Story Comments

Posted by: JamesMarcus 1 year, 1 month ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 100%
    JamesMarcus1 year, 1 month ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Yes, our election cycle is ghastly--a marathon that exhausts both the candidates and the public, even as it flushes several hundred million dollars down the toilet. We should have a four-month election process, with compulsory public financing for all candidates who make it through the primaries. Oh, and can we dump the electoral college while we're at it? :)

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    5 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      ind061 year, 1 month ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Yes, but WHERE would we dump it? There are issues of toxicity here.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
    • 100%
      BronxBomber1 year, 1 month ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Dump the electoral college James??? ...But don't you know that a waste is a terrible thing to mind?...

      :o/

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        Mdiar1 year, 1 month ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        I like the electoral college, it just needs a tweak. Perhaps doing it like Nebraska and Maine allocate the votes; by congressional district with the winner of the popular vote picking up an extra two. Otherwise I fear all the advertising would go to attempting to pick up cities and completely ignore areas with a low population density.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          JamesMarcus1 year, 1 month ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          I would argue that parity in the Senate already protects those areas with lower population density against the metropolitan hordes. But hey, I'm speaking as a city boy :).

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply
          loading loading ...

      Post Reply

      You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

      People Who Liked This Comment (9)

      People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)

      No one voted this comment negatively.

      Submit a Story

      Advertisement

      Story Tags ?

      wir week_in_review

      Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

      Also Dropping This Article

      No one has dropped this story.

      Groups Watching This

      No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

      Also Submitted By

      No one else has submitted this story.