« Back to story "SWEET, SWEET MUSIC!!!!!Rezko Starting to Sing to Feds"

Story Comments

Posted by: jovial 1 year, 2 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

45%
jovial1 year, 2 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

What about Palin?
So she's a criminal. Why am I not surprised. I can't wait to hear the spin they try to put on this one. It was a bipartisan commission. So politics isn't the excuse. McCain has shown poor decision making ability in picking this woman (and I use that term loosely) as his running mate. Sha-na-na-na, Hey, hey, hey, goodbye! And they tried to make Obama look like the Chicago thug. Hypocrites!

Check out capj71 and his story on the latest Palin scandal. Or just turn on your television set. ROTFLMAO!

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
1 Reply

loading ...
- 40%
  Endoscopy1 year, 2 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  ROTFLMAO
  What a crock. She "possibly", not actually, had other motives than those she stated to fired a man she absolutely had a right to fire. And jovial turns this into criminal. If that is criminal then we need to examine Obamas links to ACORN and his giving them $800,000 out of his campaign funds, his close association With Rezco and the letters he wrote for him to state agencies, etc. Lots of "possiblys" to look at here and label CRIMINAL.
  
  That CRIMINAL OBAMA.
  
  I like your thinking jovial especially when the concept is turned on your hero. Rush likes to illustrate absurdity by being absurd using the Democrats own words. So turn about is fair play don't you think. Your use of logic is turned against your hero. This is fun.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...