« Back to story "McCain and Palin Are Playing With Fire"

Story Comments

Posted by: tehranchik 1 year, 1 month ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 89%
    tehranchik1 year, 1 month ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Remember Rev. Wright?

    "Is inaction tantamount to consent? The McCain campaign certainly thinks so when it comes to Obama and incendiary remarks from the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. By their own inaction, then, are McCain and Palin condoning these slurs? Or worse, are they willfully inciting the angry and venomous response that we have been witnessing at their rallies? If not, then what reaction are they hoping to evoke by their relentless public suggestions that Obama is basically an anti-American liar who won't put "country first" and has an affection for terrorists? Do they not understand the kind of fire they are playing with?"

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    3 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 75%
      jordan111 year, 1 month ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      "Is inaction tantamount to consent? ">>>>

      I certainly call it that. Reverand Wright is correct.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        NotVulgarName1 year, 1 month ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        You think that Wright character was correct. You are an idiot of immense proportions!

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        memestryker1 year, 1 month ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Strangers at a rally are a lot different than someone you choose to sit in a pew and absorb ideas from for many years. Obama has supported anti-American views--he hasn't explained how he can support U.N. positions that undercut the U.S. Constitution (see the Millenium Declaration), and he did not support the Constitutional perspective in DC v. Heller, as examples (and he still intends to support infringments).

        Again, I think this writer is more likely to incite something negative by writing this--and WaPo by printing it.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...

      Post Reply

      You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

      People Who Liked This Comment (8)

      People Who Didn't Like This Comment (1)