« Back to story "The Full "Troopergate" Palin Report...Her Political Career is Over!"

Story Comments

Posted by: DeauxNut 1 year ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 31%
    DeauxNut1 year ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    I don't believe the investigation has anything to do with being "partisan" but in all likelyhood, a personal vendetta as we all know that Palin has ruffled quite a few feathers in her efforts to rid Alaska of corruption, etc. Also, if you (collectively) delve into Alaskan governmental protocol, that the Personnel Board is the one empowered to investigate claims of ethical wrongdoing and Palin and husband Todd have publicly stated that they will be 100% cooperative with the Personnel Board's inquiry later this month.

    Also of interest is that the legislative panel that produced the report did so using public funds. If anyone broke the law, it's the panel, not Palin - she broke no laws and was not, and will not be, charged with any crimes.

    Her political career is far from over, it's just getting started.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    5 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 79%
      bluetexasvalley1 year ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      "Also of interest is that the legislative panel that produced the report did so using public funds."

      Do you know what a legislative panel is? It is the state-level version of a congressional investigative committee. It is comprised of state legislators. Of course, they use public funds. Duh!

      According to this government committee, Sarah Palin broke a statute regarding ethics, an impeachable offense. Their work was finished when they issued this report, which has now gone to the entire state legislature. Now it is up to the legislature whether they want to do anything about it -- ignore, censure or impeach.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      4 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • 17%
        DeauxNut1 year ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        "It is comprised of state legislators. Of course, they use public funds. Duh!"

        The point you missed is that they used public funds to pursue their own personal agenda. Duh is right!!

        Also, the legislature has already indicated that no further action will be pursued.

        Tune in to the Personnel Board at the end of this month where Palin and husband have already indicated full cooperation. We'll wait for THAT outcome for further comment.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        3 Replies

        loading loading ...
        • 86%
          DeadXXXManXXXTalkin1 year ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          '''The point you missed is that they used public funds to pursue their own personal agenda. Duh is right!!''''

          political ethics is NOT a personal agenda. we pay these people-they are our employees. when they misuse their power its a very PUBLIC matter, not a personal one

          investigate the case-the governor and her husband had a PERSONAL agenda concerning their PERSONAL lives, and used a PUBLIC office to try to resolve it

          the panel that reached the conclusion actually had more republican than dem members on it

          that should tell you the findings were not about a personal agenda, but a misuse of public office, if nothing else does

          of course if you want to see this as a partisan demonization of Palin, nothing will stop you, even knowing the panel that found her 'guilty' was bipartisan and actually had more people on it from her own party

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 88%
            jordan111 year ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            This is an ethics matter. The state legislature had every responsibility to deal with this. They made their decision based on that responsibility. Whether or not they pursue any further action isn't the point. The point is, she was found to have participated in unethical conduct. Sort of like John McCain was found to have have used "poor judgment" in a Senate ethics review over the Keating scandal.

            As for the Personnel Board, you mean the one with her appointees sitting on it? That personnel board? Who cares what they say about it. It will not negate the findings of the committee.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply
            loading loading ...

      Post Reply

      You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

      People Who Liked This Comment (4)

      People Who Didn't Like This Comment (9)

      Submit a Story

      Advertisement

      Story Tags ?

      politics election 2008 alaska troopergate palin sarah

      Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

      Also Dropping This Article

      No one has dropped this story.

      Groups Watching This

      No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

      Also Submitted By

      No one else has submitted this story.