« Back to story "Gov. Sarah Palin Makes Troopergate Assertions that Are Flatly False"

Story Comments

Posted by: DeauxNut 1 year, 2 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 18%
    DeauxNut1 year, 2 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    "But, according to Gov. Palin, she is “ very very pleased to be cleared of any legal wrongdoing "

    That is 100% correct, " .. cleared of any legal wrongdoing". She didn't commit a crime, therefore no legal wrongdoing. And she didn't refuse to testify. Instead she made the correct call by insisting that the correct investigative body is the "Personnel Board" and that she and her husband will in fact cooperate with that board's inquiry at the end of this month. Not only that but the taxpayers of Alaska had to foot the bill for the obvious witchhunt - partisan BS, nothing to do with Dem or Repubs, personal vendetta is more like it.

    You know ... it's one thing to be FOR your candidate and AGAINST another's candidate but when you spread all the lies and hate filled "out of context" mish mash of selected diatribe to suit your own agenda, then you're doing more harm than good because the readers get to know who you are and simply dismiss the posts/replies, etc. and have a very strong tendency to vote for the "other" guy.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    4 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 76%
      questionseverything1 year, 2 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      here the neo cons go again with more "illegal but not criminal activity" we have come to know so well under bushbots

      when the govt is prosecuting citizens they use the full letter of the law but when neo cons r caught lying,breaking ethics "rules" they act like those "rules" r the pirate code...just suggestions

      the idea that palin has appointed the board that will clear her later is such a conflict of interest that no one is fooled

      palin ,her hubby and staff illegally persued a personal vendetta for monthes and then fired the guy that wouldnt cave to their criminal behavior...we dont need this rovian crap in DC

      the only chance neo cons have fro winning this election is...they own the voting machines and diebold

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      2 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • 80%
        cleare1 year, 2 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        yes questions, palin supporters seem sublimely able to split hairs.

        there are many things that may not be illegal, but are unethical or immoral.

        this bi-partisan investigation found her within her rights, but still guilty of abuse of power. i wonder what deauxnut would say if palin were a democrat?

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
        • 0%
          DeauxNut1 year, 2 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          "i wonder what deauxnut would say if palin were a democrat?"

          Same thing probably. Do anything to smear the opposition, fair or not, right? But remember, democrap's mascot is a jackass, well assigned.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
      • 86%
        disraeli1 year, 2 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        DeauxNut

        Palin's statement (and by extension your statement) that she has been "cleared of any legal wrongdoing" is not borne out by the very words of the report that she claims as support.

        To be clear I will quote directly from the report,

        "Finding Number One

        For the reasons explained in Section IV of this report, I find that Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act."

        I don't see any gray in that quote. I don't see how your claims of "out of context mish mash of selected diatribe" in any way mitigates the clear and unambiguous statement set forth in the report as Finding Number One.

        Palin violated a specific section of an Alaska statute. Surely that qualifies as "legal wrongdoing" Would you please explain to me that the report "cleared [Palin] of any legal wrongdoing" as the Governor claims and as you support as 100% correct?

        Your position, like that of Governor Palin's doesn't make any sense.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...

      Post Reply

      You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

      People Who Liked This Comment (3)

      People Who Didn't Like This Comment (14)