Story Comments
Posted by: amervtrn 1 year ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
0%
amervtrn1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The old green eyed monster tends to do things like that. It is a Democratic stronghold, and the Dem's Broad lost. So it could be jealousy . LOL
Reply
For those fighting the party wars.
Party is the madness of many for the gain of a few.-Alexander Pope
If your 20 and not a Liberal, You have no Heart. If you are 40 and not a Conservative, You have no Brain--Sir Winston Churchhill
This is supposed to be an election for president not PR rock star. You are hiring the CEO of Firm USA. Who do you want to run the firm, a manager with over 25 years experience or the newly hired stockboy?
If you complain about Palin's experience to be VP candidate where does that leave Obama? She has more real experience than he has. Or is Obama really running as Biden's VP?-
100%
earthlingerer1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Manager or stockboy? It seems they both have the exact same job titles right now...
Reply
Now if you said the choice was between a pair of managers, and a manager who just picked up the bag girl, you might be a lot closer.
And if your going to mention 25 years of bad experience, you may as well mention that Biden has had the same job a lot longer.
Obama is associated with a "terrorist" against the war movement. McCain is associated with a financial terrorist who cost the government billions.
But they are BOTH traitors to america, and that's for certain! -
100%
vor1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Another insipid post from the Right. Obama is no stockboy. Watching him discuss his worldview and how this was shaped in an interview with Fareed Zakaria several months back convinced me of that. I would love to see Sarah Palin sit down with such a person and even attempt to reply to such complicated questions. Of course this will never happen. Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric are one thing, Zakaria is an entirely different animal. Experience is not ability and populism is not intellectualism. She would fail miserably in such an interview and she and her advisors know this.
Reply
GW Bush is a neophyte compared to Obama and his understanding of the world and its varied cultures, even after serving 8 years in office. Of course Bush never got to make many tough decisions. I don't think you will see Obama deferring to Biden as Bush deferred to Cheney. Hopefully we never see this from another US President.
You have no brain if you are a conservative and approve of the actions of the Bush Administration. And you certainly have little brain if you earn less than 100k a year and vote Republican this year. McCain is now running on lies and innuendo (and he knows it!). To ask the public to continue to believe in trickle down economics would seem an impossible task but somehow he has convinced at least 40% of the voters to continue to follow that path. That number alone is alarming.
Watching McCain and Palin on Hannity last week reminded me of the old Bullwinkle cartoon villains Boris and Natasha. Palin in particular coming off as someone who should never hold high office in this country. Despite the polls she is alarmingly close. McCain is now just a figure of pity. He has truly sold his soul for a prize he doesn't seem to even want anymore. He sees the Faustian bargain he has made and he wants out. Hopefully, come November, the people will grant his wish.-
Neutral
beavith11 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Reply
put the kool aid down and back away from the kooler.
Zakaria is a completely different animal? what?
McCain is running on lies and innuendo? what planet are you on? O and the democrats are the party of fakery, disingenuousness and misdirection.
trickle down economics is textbook macroeconomics. having O complain about it and talk about pain trickling up is populist BS. shame on you, and your ilk, for not knowing the difference. his alternate is ... is.... no plan but a retrenchment to failed Keynesian and 1970s policies.
and do you want to know why the polls are so close? because people can see the man behind the curtain.
O is not ready. come back in 20 years....-
Neutral
Sabretooth1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"trickle down economics is textbook macroeconomics."
Reply
Trickle down economics is wealth transfer from the poor and middle class to the rich. Listen friend, you are not talking to a bunch of fearful repubs here, where you can just pull any comment out of your butt and they will believe it. You want to stimulate an economy, put money in the hands of the people who spend, the poor and middle class.
-
-
-
loading ...
People Who Liked This Comment (0)
No one voted this comment positively. Is it really that bad of a comment?
GWHayduke
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.