Story Comments
Posted by: hamy 1 year, 2 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-

hamy1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I love that Bush get's no blame for the economy. It's a senator and two members of the house who single handedly destroyed our economy. When the president who grabbed more power than any president in history gets off scott free. Obama isn't president yet. Blame him for the mistakes that he makes, blame Bush for the countless mistakes he made and the lives that he wasted.
Reply-

Georgia501 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
No one is saying Bush is off the hook. There's lots of blame to go around. But please...there is absolutely nothing negative you can throw at Palin that is not immediately dwarfed by orders of magnitude by the likes of Obama, Frank, and Dodd. And we don't even know the extent of the damage to our economy yet. Or whether any of us will have jobs a year from now.
Reply
I got no problem with Palin paying the piper if there was malfeasance in the construction of her home. Throw the book at her. But then be ready to throw a proportionately sized book at the above three stooges, too.-

hamy1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
She is not running for president. She is McCain's sidekick. I say blame the guy running the show. He is RESPONSIBLE for the well being of the commonwealth. Not the little guys who were just running things on a day to day basis. Blame the person who's overall vision was so short sided as to cause a world crisis.
Reply
And since it is so cut and dry to you that those three are the cause of all of this, why hasn't the attorney general who is in Bush's pocket gone after them? Bush could easily give some clout to McCain and hurt Obama if he ordered the attorney general to investigate, couldn't he?
Why wouldn't he do that? I wonder. -

NoWayMan1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"there is absolutely nothing negative you can throw at Palin that is not immediately dwarfed by orders of magnitude by the likes of Obama, Frank, and Dodd."
Reply
when it comes to Palin, maybe its true. But this possible scandal is much bigger since she might have actually brokent he law.
AND...
when it comes to our financial situation, there is PLENTY to throw at McCain.
SO...AGAIN:
please explain how Phil Graham, McCain's top economic adviser, was named yesterday as one of the ten people most responsible for the financial mess we're now in.
because this FACT makes it so that there is absolutely nothing negative you can throw at Obama that is not immediately dwarfed by orders of magnitude by the likes of McCain and Graham.
-
-
People Who Liked This Comment (11)
Submit a Story
Advertisement

loading ...
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.