Story Comments
Posted by: swvmd 1 year, 2 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
100%
swvmd1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Try reading anything legitimate and you'll see McNasty is another McFraud just like Shrub-Dick. Rolling Stone has an in-depth article complete with interviews with former classmates, peers and fellow POWS all of whom describe this petulent
Reply
elitist as an opportunist and core scumbag. It's factual which is something the media has avoided dealing with since repuked spin replaced actual reporting. He's another conservative clone with a fictional persona adopted shamelessly by himself and now pitched to the media and the nation by the same Rove apparatus that gave us W.-
0%
amervtrn1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You consider Rolling Stone research?Research what and who you vote for, check your resources, do not buy into the hype, think and reason for yourself.
Reply
For those fighting the party wars.
Party is the madness of many for the gain of a few.-Alexander Pope
If your 20 and not a Liberal, You have no Heart. If you are 40 and not a Conservative, You have no Brain--Sir Winston Churchhill-
-
90%
GWHayduke1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Amervtn's parroting of Churchill's statment is a very good example of one's inability to think rationally and for him/herself.
Reply
Discrediting Rolling Stone and any other dissenting view as "hype" while embracing the most extreme similar views is par for this putt-putt course.
His claim that he is not 'fighting the party war' and 'do your own research' bears a shocking resemblance to this exchange:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUOFTPbxuWA
Funny how the Nobel winner was dead on in his assessment, while the radical, partisan hack turns out to be nothing more than a yelling lunatic with ZERO credibility.-
0%
reidgator1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Oh, please do not give Krugman any credit.
Reply
He as been predicting "recession" for 7 straight years. He even predicted recession during Clinton's administration. Sooner or later, recessions will come. And "Chicken Little" will sit back and say "I told you so."
But, if you insist on giving Krugman credit, then, this is HIS explanation for our current finacial crisis: (NYTimes, July 4, 2008)
"At the top of my list of causes for the lousy economy are three factors: the housing bubble and its aftermath, rising health care costs and soaring raw materials prices."
Note that even Krugman does not blame Bush.
So, does this mean YOU will stop blaming Bush? After all, Krugman won the Nobel Prize for Economics, thus, he muuuust be right!!!-
-
0%
reidgator1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You may have a degree, but, you are not educated.
Reply
So what if you did not mention Bush. You brought up Paul Krugman and his Nobel Prize.
(Did you even know his name? I know your resources are limited to videos and comic books. You know, lots of pictures.)
I simply responded that Krugman does not deserve the accolades he is getting. He is a "Chicken Little". I used his analysis of the Bush economy to get you to rethink your praise of him.
-
-
-
-
-
-
loading ...
People Who Liked This Comment (10)
jordan11
tchef
fsev41
Goppy
Will1313
quiescence
crespi
dunkirk
GWHayduke
ProgressivePeople Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)
No one voted this comment negatively.
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.