Story Comments

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

Why would someone with that background say that the CIA created AIDS to kill black people.
Why would someone like that say that whites in America were keeping the blacks under their yoke.

Probably because of things like this:

Using Human Beings as Laboratory Anima

For forty years between 1932 and 1972, the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) conducted an experiment on 399 black men in the late stages of syphilis. These men, for the most part illiterate sharecroppers from one of the poorest counties in Alabama, were never told what disease they were suffering from or of its seriousness. Informed that they were being treated for “bad blood,” their doctors had no intention of curing them of syphilis at all.

The data for the experiment was to be collected from autopsies of the men, and they were thus deliberately left to degenerate under the ravages of tertiary syphilis—which can include tumors, heart disease, paralysis, blindness, insanity, and death. “As I see it,” one of the doctors involved explained, “we have no further interest in these patients until they die.”

http://www.infoplease.com/spot/bhmtuskegee1.html

1 Reply

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

You're asking all the wrong questions (they've all been asked before, including dozens of times by you, and debunked). Try these:

1) Why does the beauty pageant runner up who likes to shoot defenseless animals a lot think she's above the law?

2) Could the average con shill being paid by the McCain camp to post horsecrap online be found guilty of abusing their power and then skip merrily along the next day as if nothing happened?

3) Why did it take Sarah 5 years of criss-crossing among 3 colleges in three states to get a journalism degree?

4) Why can't someone with a journalism degree think of what the names of sources she reads to stay informed when asked by a broadcast journalist in an interview?

5) Why was someone with a journalism degree caught like an Alaska moose in a shotgun sight when asked by that same journalist what her running mate's qualifications are?

6) Can Sarah Palin read?

7) Given the state of America today, aren't cons even remotely concerned that, in voting for Sarah Palin, they could possibly be voting for someone even dumber than Dan Quayle?

8) Whatever happened to Dan Quayle?

9) Why don't cons want Sarah Palin to be interviewed (even by the right wing media)?

10) Why are cons so confident about voting for her in a few weeks (by which time they will have known John McCain's dizzy, winking trollop of a vp choice barely two whole months) and yet they can't stop whacking off out of frustration over what they don't know about Barack Obama (who's been campaigning for the last two years)? ;-(

1 Reply