« Back to story "Obama Squashes The GOP ACORN Smear"

Story Comments

Posted by: mesodude 1 year, 1 month ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 73%
    mesodude1 year, 1 month ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    I think Obama realizes that most voters have no idea who or what ACORN is and that he could afford to wait (and spend quality time instead preparing to answer voters' questions about things that are actually important to them. Cons, meanwhile, have continued to look like desperate rabid weasels frothing at the mouth and digging in place like panic stricken gohpers on crack. Like rats, scampering to find the nearest hole in the ground, basically, cons are in a holding pattern of fear and smear. As cons continue to roll around in their own excrement, looking like lethargic farm animals in heat, McCain's campaign continues to wither and die on the vine. It's really a sad, ugly, and shameful picture. ;-(

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    7 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 24%
      FairNBalanced1 year, 1 month ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I stopped reading your post when I came to the first time you used 'con'.

      Your style of writing only appeals to those like you. People who are rude and full of lack of respect.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      6 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • 60%
        jordan111 year, 1 month ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        I take it then you haven't a clue what CONS are saying?

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
        • 29%
          FairNBalanced1 year, 1 month ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          You could not help yourself, could you?

          Thanks for proving my point.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
        • 72%
          tchef1 year, 1 month ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Respect is something that is earned. Looking at the last 8 years and the last 3 Presidential campaigns the Republicans have not earned it.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 75%
            mesodude1 year, 1 month ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            "I stopped reading your post when I came to the first time you used 'con'."

            --FairlyUnBalanced, what's wrong with YOU CONS? Seriously? Who do you think you're talking to? Do you think I or anyone here gives a freaking CRAP what you choose to "ignore" because your little right wing nutcase feelings are hurt? Exactly...Everyone here sees the stories you CONS post, the stories you CONS prop, the stories you CONS comment on and the sleazy and utterly reprehensible comments you and your fellow CONS respond to and prop EVERY FREAKING DAY you post here. Get serious. I don't FREAKING CARE what you CONS think of what I post and I don't care about YOU, CON either. Waste your time responding to my posts just so you can helpfully tell me why you're NOT responding to my posts all you want. ROTFLMAO. I DON'T FREAKING CARE, CON. You got that, CON?! I don't CARE. ;-(

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • 75%
              NoWayMan1 year, 1 month ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              ...said the guy who is named after the right's media propaganda machine whose "journalists" are nothing but rude and full of lack of respect.

              oh the irony that always escapes the cons, even when it hits them square in the face.

              and I could give a sh*t if you think con is a legit term, since its used so much that it obviously is legit, and there's absolutely nothing you can do about it.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply
              loading loading ...

          Post Reply

          You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

          People Who Liked This Comment (16)

          People Who Didn't Like This Comment (6)