« Back to story "Gallup Poll: Americans Oppose Redistributing Wealth 84% To 13%"

Story Comments

Posted by: Candida 1 year, 1 month ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 71%
    Candida1 year, 1 month ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    It never ceases to amaze me how greedy Americans are. I used to think that they just want things that others outside the US have, but I'm starting to be convinced that they are envious toward each other. What's even more puzzling is that most Americans call themselves Christians.

    I found the recent media frenzy about Joe the plumber really funny and revealing. For the life of me, I couldn't figure out what his problem was with Obama's tax plan. Since he makes well under $200,000 now, he would enjoy a tax break. Why is he worried about a hypothetical situation that may or may not happen? How do Republicans convince so many people to vote against their own self-interests?

    His story reminds me of a folk tale I heard in my childhood. Briefly, it goes something like this:

    A man goes home one day and finds his wife in tears. She is looking at his gun and is crying her heart out. He asks what the problem is. She tells him that she is grieving for their son. "What do you mean?" he asks. She tells him: "You are so selfish. You never think of anyone but yourself. You put that gun on that shelf in that cupboard and never even considered that our son could find it and shoot himself accidentally." Puzzled, the man says: "First of all, the gun isn't loaded, and second, we don't have any children." "But one day we could," says the woman, "and if we had a son, he could open that cupboard door, pull a chair there, climb on it, reach the gun, which could be loaded at that time, and shoot himself accidentally."

    This is what Joe the plumber sounded to me. Even though Obama's plan would benefit him now, which would make it easier for him to save up some money to buy a business one day, he is against it because if and when he does, and if and when he makes more than $250,000, he will have to pay higher taxes. Who knows what the conditions will be by then if that time ever comes!

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    15 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 83%
      jdhatl1 year, 1 month ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      He'd have to pay just 3% more taxes, which isn't that much. And hey, someone has to pay for all these damn wars and cr*p

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 83%
        italymeetsdixie1 year, 1 month ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        I know a few plumbers. Even if they had the inclination to buy the business they for which they had been working, their only possible hope they would have for the purchase would be to use a second mortgage on their house. In this economy, which has been made possible by republican party, his house is nearly worthless.

        Which brings me to my next point. How is he going to keep a plumming business afloat in a housing crisis? Instead of worrying about taxes he might have to pay if he can afford to buy a this business, it looks more prudent to think about saving his money until the crisis is more settled and the housing market starts building.

        It is the "American Dream" at work here. Everyone believes that one day they too will be rich and powerful and that at that point the higher taxes will be an issue. It is classic, putting your cart before your horse.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 36%
          theido1 year, 1 month ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Blah blah blah. The main point which you are ignoring or are completely ignorant of is that Joe the plumber and 84% of the country do not want wealth redistribution.

          You are also forgetting that Obama and the rest of the Dems will let the Bush tax cut's expire, which will INCREASE YOUR TAXES.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply

          8 Replies

          loading loading ...
          • 80%
            Goppy1 year, 1 month ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            You are right about the fact that America doesn't want Wealth Redistribution.

            That's why George W. Bush has the lowest approval rating of all time.

            Americans look at how he's redistributed immense wealth to the wealthiest ... simply because they were already wealthy ... and to pay for this scheme ... he borrowed from Communists in China.

            Ideological Idiocy.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply

            7 Replies

            loading loading ...
            • 36%
              theido1 year, 1 month ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              -"That's why George W. Bush has the lowest approval rating of all time."

              You're not gonna find me defending Bush when it comes to the bailout and other such policies he's signed for.

              You can dodge the issue by bringing up Bush, but the fact is that Obama is for wealth redistribution and we can do something about it. We can't do anything more about Bush. Nice try though.

              -"he's redistributed immense wealth to the wealthiest "

              Taking less is not giving. Taking without earning is stealing, or taxing if you want to be politically correct.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply

              5 Replies

              loading loading ...
              • 71%
                GWHayduke1 year, 1 month ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                Do you understand the difference between 'wealth' and 'income'?

                Or are you merely parroting the pathetic and patently false nonsense you heard on the radio?

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply

                4 Replies

                loading loading ...
                • 40%
                  theido1 year, 1 month ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  I'm "parroting the pathetic and patently false nonsense you heard on the radio?"

                  INCOME is taxed and then that WEALTH is giving to others, hence wealth redistribution. You can say anything you want, but taxing someones wealth OR income is still taking money from someone and giving to someone else.

                  Please stick to the points instead of trying to discredit me which does nothing to validate your views.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                  Reply

                  3 Replies

                  loading loading ...
                  • 75%
                    GWHayduke1 year, 1 month ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    Wealth is the accumulation of property and assets.

                    Income is liquid money earned from employers or interest.

                    And it DOES make a significant difference:

                    I can earn $500,000 a year and spend it ALL and not have ANY wealth.

                    My grandmother earns ZERO and has enormous wealth left to her by her family. She LOVES W's tax plan, particularly the estate tax portion.

                    -"You can say anything you want, but taxing someones wealth OR income is still taking money from someone and giving to someone else."-

                    Like Halliburton, Blackwater, General Dynamics and any other corporation subsidized by the government?

                    You're OK with that because.....why?

                    To live in a civil society there MUST be a certain degree of equality or civility will not exist.

                    Those points are very relevant, but because you want to reduce everything to a black and white issue that simpletons can agree with, in order to support your weak assertion really does bring into question your ability to analyze complex situations.

                    Just as McW planned.

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                    Reply
                    loading loading ...
              • 25%
                simonsez1 year, 1 month ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                Goppy, you didn't have any more coming to you. You talked when you should have worked ... someone working got your share.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply
                loading loading ...
            • 70%
              HannibalBarca1 year, 1 month ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              Hey Candida;
              Loved your story, it is spot on.!!
              It also shows me female logic
              LMAO

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply

              3 Replies

              loading loading ...
              • 80%
                HannibalBarca1 year, 1 month ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                ohhh the negs for humour.....ROTFLMAO
                And for all you neggers, I am pretty sure Candida has a comeback for me, only with a smile, as that is how it was delivered.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply

                2 Replies

                loading loading ...
                • 100%
                  Candida1 year, 1 month ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  I am smiling, but I won't stand for stereotypes of either gender.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                  Reply

                  1 Reply

                  loading loading ...
                  • 100%
                    HannibalBarca1 year, 1 month ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    Does that mean sitting is out of the question ?

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                    Reply
                    loading loading ...

            Post Reply

            You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

            People Who Liked This Comment (22)

            People Who Didn't Like This Comment (9)