« Back to story "Gallup Poll: Americans Oppose Redistributing Wealth 84% To 13%"

Story Comments

Posted by: theido 1 year, 1 month ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 27%
    theido1 year, 1 month ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    You can't be that stupid. He could raise income taxes to 95% and it would have NO impact on the millions they already have.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    7 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 55%
      mesodude1 year, 1 month ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I have no idea what your point is. If Obama raises income taxes on his own income bracket, he is sacrificing more of his INCOME to the common good. If he doesn't raise taxes on his income bracket he's NOT sacrificing more of his income. ;-(

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      6 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • 38%
        theido1 year, 1 month ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Of course Obama and the dems are more than willing to give up a little extra of there income. They know it will buy them votes, and they already have more than enough money. You have business, you need money to run it. The only money the dems need to run there business, the government, is more tax money.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        5 Replies

        loading loading ...
        • 64%
          HannibalBarca1 year, 1 month ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Then try explaining to me why Obama's campaign can and has raised more funds than McC's
          I never saw congress bail him out, so where did all that money come from.
          Oh right, those tax payers who Reps have chit on.
          Gama submitted a story two days ago, that even in this economic upheaval, the CEO's and bosses on wall street are prepared to give themselves $70 bill in bonuses, $70 flipping billion for the greedy fat cats who helped this mess to happen, but for Obama wanting to somehow get some of that money to "trickle down" (now where did I hear that before) to the lower tax brackets has Reps in a tissie.
          Get a life or get laid, but do something to relieve your idiocy.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply

          3 Replies

          loading loading ...
          • 27%
            theido1 year, 1 month ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            -"Then try explaining to me why Obama's campaign can and has raised more funds than McC's"

            First try to explain how that has anything to do with my comment.

            -"but for Obama wanting to somehow get some of that money to "trickle down" (now where did I hear that before) to the lower tax brackets has Reps in a tissie."

            Trickle down economics has nothing to do with taxing the rich and giving the money to the poor. Its about creating more jobs, lowing cost of products, making it easier to the poorer to buy more and find jobs easier and make more money.

            -"Get a life or get laid, but do something to relieve your idiocy."

            Oh well now don't you sound so intelligent. Even idiots can spout off negative attacks.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply

            2 Replies

            loading loading ...
            • 73%
              HannibalBarca1 year, 1 month ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              First try to explain how that has anything to do with my comment.
              Easy, you said this
              ". The only money the dems need to run there business, the government, is more tax money."
              So I showed you were they got non Gov money.
              next you say
              "Trickle down economics has nothing to do with taxing the rich and giving the money to the poor.
              Bah humbug!!!, it is the same
              Trickle down was supposed to benefit the poorer as the wealth would trickle down from the rich
              Obamma's plan is taxing the rich a bit more so he can relieve the taxes of those in lower brackets; it is still money from the top going down; but ray-guns idea relied on people willing to do this; which they didn't, while Obama will try to make it happen.
              So I still stand by my comment
              "Get a life or get laid, but do something to relieve your idiocy."

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 11) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              • 90%
                HannibalBarca1 year, 1 month ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                One other thing, you are one of the few Reps who has answered my points with points of your own, rather than just spin or party talk
                Thank you. Still think you are wrong though

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 11) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply
                loading loading ...
            • 57%
              mesodude1 year, 1 month ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              "Of course Obama and the dems are more than willing to give up a little extra of there income."

              --I guess...But aren't Republicans buying votes by shielding the ultra-wealthy from tax liability (plus they're giving themselves tax cuts)? I guess what I'm asking is why you're suggesting that you're morally superior somehow in voting for Republicans when they're buying votes from the wealthy? ;-(

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply
              loading loading ...

        Post Reply

        You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

        People Who Liked This Comment (3)

        People Who Didn't Like This Comment (8)