« Back to story "GOP spends $150,000 for Palin's wardrobe - John McCain News - MSNBC.com"

Story Comments

Posted by: Eagle_Eye 1 year ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 80%
    Eagle_Eye1 year ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    FTA: "The Republican National Committee spent about $150,000 on clothing, hair styling, makeup and other "campaign accessories" in September for the McCain campaign after Palin joined the ticket as his running mate.

    The expenses include $75,062 spent at Neiman Marcus in Minneapolis, and $41,850 in St. Louis in early September. The committee also reported spending $4,100 for makeup and hair consulting. The expenses were first reported by Politico.com."

    Hmm, wonder if they are going to give them to "Goodwill

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    52 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 75%
      GWHayduke1 year ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      It was also reported that Cindy's plastic surgeon will be on hand to ensure that the Republicans present the "Prettiest" families!

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      7 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 62%
      smithichie1 year ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      "Hair CONSULTING"???? and ONLY for 4000 bucks? Makeup included? What a deal!
      How down to Earth and small town of Sarah, you can certainly see she is the perfect person to cut wasteful spending....

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      3 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • 68%
        not2needy1 year ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Yewww betcha, dog gone it.. wink!

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
      • 69%
        Tangent0011 year ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        I checked online for hair and makeup consulting in the Cherry Creek district (VERY well-to-do), max is $1200. WTF?

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
      • 33%
        DeauxNut1 year ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        The answer to your last sentence is yes, Goodwill and other charities and in fact they already started doing just that.

        This is a non-issue at best, the reason being is that the taxpayers are not footing the bill but rather the RNC is footing the bill taken from donations, not taxes. I made a donation and what they do or did with the money is fine by me.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        22 Replies

        loading loading ...
        • 71%
          jordan111 year ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Oh puleeeeze, that is nonsense. They decided to give it to charity after they were caught.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply

          3 Replies

          loading loading ...
          • 38%
            DeauxNut1 year ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            They already had given some to charity prior to it being made public. You're just jealous that you didn't get the hi-heels, huh?!

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply

            1 Reply

            loading loading ...
            • 67%
              HannibalBarca1 year ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              Must be cause you already nabbed them

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
            • 50%
              GehlLady1 year ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              Caught doing what? Looking good? Spending their own money?

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
            • 73%
              jordan111 year ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              I made a donation and what they do or did with the money is fine by me.>>>>

              It isn't "fine by" the federal elections committee. Sorry. Tammy Faye and her pals did a 'no no.'

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply

              6 Replies

              loading loading ...
              • 38%
                DeauxNut1 year ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                What the RNC does with their funds is not under scrutiny of the elections committee. It's a non-issue, deal with it.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply
                loading loading ...
                • 67%
                  GehlLady1 year ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  Do you have a source? Appearance is very much so a legitamit election expense.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                  Reply

                  4 Replies

                  loading loading ...
                  • 50%
                    memestryker1 year ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    And these are the same people who use ugly sexist epithets to describe Palin rather than focusing on the issues. The same people who took up for Obama when he was a newbie who didn't sound "handled."

                    I disagree with Palin on issues, but I strongly oppose bringing her gender into it, and I've seen a lot of self-proclaimed progressives and liberals attack her venomously on gender. They'll be along shortly to neg me.

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                    Reply

                    3 Replies

                    loading loading ...
                    • 50%
                      DeauxNut1 year ago

                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                      There's more of THEM than there are of YOU, so yeah, they'll gang up on you and neg you to death. Big deal.

                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                      Reply

                      2 Replies

                      loading loading ...
                      • 50%
                        memestryker1 year ago

                        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                        The price of living in a free society. Live free or die.

                        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                        Reply

                        1 Reply

                        loading loading ...
              • 67%
                Bruedaddy1 year ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                This is TOTALLY an "ISSUE".

                IT points to the lack of reasonable thinking skills by Republicans.

                Are you kidding, they want to be the "reformers" and claim to "cut" government?

                This doesn't say "responsible spending" to me at all.

                I know it wasn't tax money, It would be different if it was HER money.

                More evidence of the hipocritcal nature of McCain's campaign.

                JUST like the baseball comments.....Sarah can do it 3 times at least that we KNOW about, but if Obama says ANYTHING similar then that is bad, he is bad....

                The Country has seen through the two EMPTY SUITES on the Republican side...believe me.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply

                7 Replies

                loading loading ...
                • 50%
                  DeauxNut1 year ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  It's not an "issue" unless the RNC spent YOUR money and MY money, but they didn't. If she had appeared in bib-jeans you democraps would have been all over her trashing her looks. Get a grip. The decision, btw, to donate the wardrobe to charity was made long before the drive-by-media latched on to this story. Shame on all of youse guys.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                  Reply

                  2 Replies

                  loading loading ...
                  • Neutral
                    Bruedaddy1 year ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    eah, who gets the 10,000 dollar jacket?

                    that just fixes everything don't it.

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                    Reply
                    loading loading ...
                    • Neutral
                      Bruedaddy1 year ago

                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                      where the hell else do you think they get "THEIR" money...besides corporations?

                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                      Reply
                      loading loading ...
                    • 43%
                      buckncindykill1 year ago

                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                      This is no issue at all. Most clothiers gladly donate their clothes to candidates, the idea being that it will be THEIR designs on display if the candidate gets elected. Which brings up Hillary Clinton. She doesn't buy her pant suits like Palin has to; as a matter of fact, Hillary's suits are worth $6350 a piece retail! Should Hillary's suits have been an issue during the primaries? By your logic, the answer is a resounding YES!

                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                      Reply
                      loading loading ...
                      • 33%
                        Bucotch1 year ago

                        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                        It's going toward keeping some people working and boosting business.. DUH. At least they are'nt blowing tax payer money on radicizing the school system.

                        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                        Reply
                        loading loading ...
                        • 33%
                          GehlLady1 year ago

                          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                          Bruedaddy, by your reasoning, Michelles wardrobe HAS to be examined.
                          Perhaps you could have made a better point by citing a problem with education, especially in your district.

                          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                          Reply

                          1 Reply

                          loading loading ...
                          • Neutral
                            Bruedaddy1 year ago

                            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                            hey, F U C K Y O U...

                            Last time I looked the Obamas paid for their own clothes with THEIR OWN MONEY.

                            perhaps it's YOUR district that needs better teachers so you can get better critical thinking skills....for that matter...any at all.

                            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                            Reply
                            loading loading ...
                        • 78%
                          doppich1 year ago

                          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                          I was preparing to give a small donation to Edwards' campaign when the story broke about his charging his campaign for his $400 haircut. Since my small donation would have covered only a fraction of a haircut, I didn't send anything. I'm not sure if the GOP even has small donors, but I would sure as heck be perturbed if I found that the few bucks I could scrape together went to buy designer dresses for the candidate.

                          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                          Reply

                          2 Replies

                          loading loading ...
                          • 40%
                            nostalgia1 year ago

                            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                            "I was preparing to give a small donation to Edwards' campaign when the story broke about his charging his campaign for his $400 haircut. Since my small donation would have covered only a fraction of a haircut, I didn't send anything"

                            If it took that bit of news for you to realize what a sham Edwards was, I question your ability to make wise decisions

                            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                            Reply

                            1 Reply

                            loading loading ...
                            • 100%
                              doppich1 year ago

                              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                              For getting over your candidate's impending loss, I suggest you skip the insults and go straight to the gin.

                              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                              Reply
                              loading loading ...
                        • 32%
                          Endoscopy1 year ago

                          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                          REALITY CHECK

                          Obama - wealthy - has high quality cloths
                          Biden - wealthy - has high quality clothes
                          McCain - Wealthy - has high quality cloths
                          Palin - not wealthy - has regular cloths

                          What did the libs complain about as far as cloths.
                          Early on the libs criticized her clothing saying several put downs about what she wore.
                          When the new cloths were bought that stopped.
                          Now libs have to go ballistic because the RNC did the nice thing and bought cloths that matched the quantity and quality of the other candidates.

                          Such compassion.
                          Why do you have a problem with this. It is the Republican party giving her the ability to look as good as Obama and Biden. I guess you think she should wear the cloths you enjoyed criticizing. That is probably the problem.

                          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                          Reply

                          5 Replies

                          loading loading ...
                          • 65%
                            GWHayduke1 year ago

                            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                            Soooo Lipstick wearing pitbull candidate Palin spends about three times what Joe the Plumber earns in a year on her wardrobe?

                            Shes in touch, or will she merely be charging incidentals to the public once again should she take office?

                            And THIS is your candidate who knows how to spend?

                            Better luck in '12!

                            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                            Reply

                            1 Reply

                            loading loading ...
                            • 29%
                              DeauxNut1 year ago

                              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                              "She" didn't spend anything, didn't charge anything to the public, etc. ad nauseum. Yes, this is MY candidate that put on the best appearance than any OTHER candidate. And when she's the VP, she'll do the same for the heads of state, leaders, etc. around the planet. Much better than showing up in bib-jeans.

                              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                              Reply
                              loading loading ...
                            • 29%
                              ekklesiawarrior1 year ago

                              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                              Endoscopy - Great Words -

                              Talk about two-faced? Ugh

                              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                              Reply
                              loading loading ...
                              • 20%
                                memestryker1 year ago

                                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                Nothing Palin does will change these people's views. We have the misogynists, who hate her just because she's female, we have some extreme members of the far left, who hate her because of her socially conservative and economically liberal beliefs and positions, we have the juvenile, who think she's attractive enough to Photoshop her head onto nude bodies and call her typical female derogatory terms, and we have ordinary democrats who simply disagree with her platform and won't vote for her.

                                The clothes are going to be sold for charity after the election. It's done all the time. But for those who already hate her, for whatever reason, it's another excuse to attack her.

                                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                                Reply

                                1 Reply

                                loading loading ...
                                • 0%
                                  memestryker1 year ago

                                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                  (I guess there aren't a lot of ordinary democrats posting here!) ;)

                                  For the record, I'm a progressive libertarian.

                                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                                  Reply
                                  loading loading ...
                              • 60%
                                Engnr1 year ago

                                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                Sounds like another case of walking the walk and talking the talk. Sarah is a one woman economic stimulus plan. Good going!!

                                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                                Reply
                                loading loading ...

                              Post Reply

                              You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

                              People Who Liked This Comment (16)

                              People Who Didn't Like This Comment (4)