Obama: Constitution Reflects Fundamental Flaw In This Country »

Posted By JaimieM 1 year, 1 month ago in News

Even more audio damaging to Barack Obama has surfaced from 2001 Chicago Public Radio interviews. Via Drudge, here we find Barack Obama saying that the U.S. Constitution “ reflected the fundamental flaw of this country that continues to this day” .

Read Full Story at amerpundit.com »

8563 Views Share Story 74 Comments Report

Submitted By:
JaimieM

Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Showing 170 of 211 Comments (view all)
- Display
  • 26%
    JaimieM1 year, 1 month ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    This is the second Obama tape leaking out about his core beliefs. This stuff will be - and I would venture, should be - downright scary to a lot of people.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    56 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 35%
    erectoraz1 year, 1 month ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Absolutlofreakinamazing !!! I just imagine all these fools who voted for Obama. Standing in the middle of the road asking themselves. What the "F" happened??? All dazed and confused when their country is gone. Change is coming alright...Most certainly not the change they think.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    13 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 29%
    Karlyc1 year, 1 month ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    When you get sworn in as President you put your hand on the Bible and swear you will uphold the Constitution. Will Obama have to like about that ... or does he have a secret plan to fundamentally change the constitution. Scary stuff.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    22 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 65%
    jordan111 year, 1 month ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    This tripe reflects nothing. There was obviously a more entailed discussion that has been omitted, so you can't tell what 'the' funamental flaw is that Obama was addressing. Taking things out of context is typical dirty CON politics. And guess what. Americans are sick of it.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    11 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 68%
    Ratskii1 year, 1 month ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    If I were to sport a guess, I suspect he was referring to the Constitution's original legitimization of slavery and commenting that the consequences of that legitimization are continuing to this day. Like Jordan11 and earthlingerer I'd like to hear more of the context the statement occurs in.

    You'll notice he did say that the constitution is a remarkable document and he respects it. I also notice that the usual suspects are immediately eating up this as an "Obama wants to overthrow the constitution" conspiracy, without asking what he was actually saying.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    5 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 41%
    Magowah1 year, 1 month ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Um, you do realize there was a constitutional amendment concerning slavery, the right to vote, forbidding discrimination based on race, national origin etc...? If there was a "flaw" it has long since been corrected. The country "changed" a long time ago, and but for the constant resurrection of the "slavery card", that change would have been sufficient.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    5 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 38%
    Karlyc1 year, 1 month ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Obama explained his statement in the other tape circulating on the other thread. As explained here: http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YmFhYzIzMGQ1Y...

    "And uh, to that extent, as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution — at least as it’s been interpreted, and [the] Warren Court interpreted it in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties: [it] says what the states can’t do to you, says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf."

    The United States of America — five percent of the world’s population — leads the world economically, militarily, scientifically, and culturally — and by a spectacular margin. Any one of these achievements, taken alone, would be cause for enormous pride. To dominate as we do in all four arenas has no historical precedent. That we have achieved so much in so many areas is due — due entirely — to the structure of our society as outlined in the Constitution of the United States.

    The entire purpose of the Constitution was to limit government. That limitation of powers is what has unlocked in America the vast human potential available in any population.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    11 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 82%
    Magowah1 year, 1 month ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    "...many of the attitudes...are still around in some parts of the population..." Last I heard, couldnt legislate someone's attitude! As long as there are people around, where-ever in the world, some will have good and some will have bad attitude. The only way to rid a country of people with "bad attitudes" is to do what Stalin, Hitler, Hussein, Pol Pot, etc...tried to do---and even that ultimately fails as long as the good ole USA with its bad attitude in upholding the Constitution, continues to do just that.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 30%
      Karlyc1 year, 1 month ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I wish someone could rationally explain why anyone who claims to love their country would think the constitution is so bad that it is fundamentally flawed.

      To me it seems you have to be harboring an enormous amount of hostility to seriously hold such beliefs, and then go on the radio to announce them.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      5 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 82%
      ISITJUSTME1 year, 1 month ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      First there are the Bill of Rights. Then there are the Amendments that correct the FLAWS in the Constitution. Where do you all get this crap from?

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 74%
        Ignis1 year, 1 month ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Context is ambiguous, also this video that keeps getting linked to about it is on youtube and disallows comments, which says a lot about the whole thing.

        The federal reserve was a mistake, Ron Paul declares that clearly, but that certainly wasn't intentioned by the founding fathers. Thomas Jefferson expressed quite clearly how dangerous the banks are, so I doubt he means that.

        Obama could mean the electoral college, that's certainly garbage. But perhaps that's wishful thinking on my part.

        I'm glad he plans on doing something for social security though, there's really nothing more patriotic then something Thomas Paine came up with and it's helped many people, we don't need someone like Reagen (McBushe's Hero) coming in and raping it again.

        But as for slavery, I don't know he could mean that, like I said too ambiguous, no one should be satisfied without hearing what flaw he's talking about, for the sake of honesty to themselves.

        Anyway people let me end this post by pointing out something obvious, if the constitution "written by men" is flawless than why did we need amendments? Sounds like some sort of idol worship to me.

        At least Obama sounds a little different from the usual trash we get, eg. Bush.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 28%
          k9kssr1 year, 1 month ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Ignis

          It is good that you can admit Obama's trash talking is different.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 61%
            Tcaros1 year, 1 month ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            There you go again quoting the "drugged" Drudge report.

            (for those who don't know Drugde you are better off)

            Anyway, Jamie (guy, girl- can't tell) the only threat to the Constitution is our current president and his administration that collaborated in violating the laws of the land.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • 32%
              ningyo1 year, 1 month ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              the fundemental flaw that this marxist monster sees in our constitution is that it spells out what he calls negative rights..that is what the limits of what govt can do TO its citizens..in obamaworld the constitution goes out the window and would be replaced be a "document" that spells out what the govt is required to do FOR its citizens..theres no context or fox shading here..barry sees everything through his racist socialist view of this country..just like his redistribution of wealth gaffe..thats what he believes..thats why he stayed at rev wrongs church..thats who he is

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              • 38%
                ningyo1 year, 1 month ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                but all this wont matter to the obama kool-aid drinkers..if they think that obama will make them richer at he expense of the 250,000 earner..WRONG..the obama socialist plan is for everyone to be at the same level ..broke and dependent on the govt fot their daily ration of rice

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                Reply

                1 Reply

                loading loading ...
              • 37%
                ningyo1 year, 1 month ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                the electoral college was pure genius..otherwise every president since forever would have been elected by the "GIMME MORE" welfare class in NYC chicago and LA at the expense of the people pulling the wagon in flyover country

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                Reply

                3 Replies

                loading loading ...
              • 77%
                moxxxxxxxxxx1 year, 1 month ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                No context given.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                Reply
                loading loading ...
                • 45%
                  MisterX1 year, 1 month ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  So does this mean it's not just a goddamn piece of paper now? Now it reflects the fundamental flaw of the country.

                  I'm getting more worried by the day.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                  Reply

                  2 Replies

                  loading loading ...
                • 38%
                  ChefEOD1 year, 1 month ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  Check out this one...
                  http://tinyurl.com/6f37dy

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                  Reply
                  loading loading ...
                  • 64%
                    Tcaros1 year, 1 month ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    The Republican party is the "party of the gimmick."

                    Here's how it works.... you dig up something and present it out of context. Then you patent a product and try and pass it off like it's popular.

                    Does anyone remember the McCain tire guage? No. I thought so. McCain needs that tire guage for his "straight talk express." It's got a flat tire.

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                    Reply

                    1 Reply

                    loading loading ...
                  • 69%
                    NoWayMan1 year, 1 month ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    like the first respondant said on the amerpundit blog post page: "So WHAT is the fundamental flaw/blind spot in the constitution that Obama is talking about? Providing some context for this clip would be nice!"

                    and considering that the GOP has done more in the last 8 years to destroy our constitution than Obama ever could...

                    this is just more hooey.

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                    Reply

                    6 Replies

                    loading loading ...
                  • 38%
                    csunbean1 year, 1 month ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    Heck Obama doesn't care about the consitution. His GLOBAL POVERTY ACT helps not one American. His actions help his Nonnegotiable Commitment to Africa.
                    Presidents are supposed to UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES!!!!!!
                    He is a fake a fraud, and maybe even a Satanists. SATANISTS are Supporting and Promoting Obama on youtube. WHY? Maybe because his Black Theology religion believes," Any GOD that doesn't work for the DESTRUCTION of the White enemy should be KILLED." SO this would mean Jesus and Christianity should be killed. Obama can't follow his religion and follow the constitution! The two are opposed.
                    Satanists for Obama on youtube
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSvdm3EA5cE

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                    Reply

                    1 Reply

                    loading loading ...
                  View All 211 Comments

                  Add a Comment

                  Sign In With Your Propeller Account

                  Forgot your password?

                  Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

                  To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

                  More News