Comments for VIDEO: OPRAH SEES OWN PRESIDENTIAL VOTE DROPPED BY TOUCH-SCREEN VOTING MACHINE »
Posted By Spadecaller 1 year, 1 month ago in News'I went back to check it, it had not recorded my presidential vote!' Oprah voted yesterday on an electronic voting machine. Whether it is a Diebold or Sequoia machine; her vote and yours is still 100% unverifiable.
Read Full Story at bradblog.com »
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentComments So Far: 244
-
31%
RickyDawkins1 year, 1 month ago
-
-
83%
Sabretooth1 year, 1 month ago
-
23%
protoham1 year, 1 month ago
-
-
-
-
100%
bill-smith1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
More literate that say protoham.
Reply
--"The bottom line is Oprah is to stupid to operate a voting machine." --
The bottom line is Oprah is TOO stupid to operate a voting machine.
At least when I've seen insults fly from the left they're generally grammatically correct and perhaps more importantly, they're usually based in truth. -
-
-
-
-
-
75%
Tangent0011 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Um, your personal opinion notwithstanding, I design software and if it's not something very specialized, you design with the stupidest person possible in mind. We're dealing with first-time voters and Luddite voters who don't have a clue about computers in the first place.
Reply
It's disgraceful design.
I don't think there is anything fraudulent going on, because there wouldn't be any indication on the touch-screen anything was wrong in the first place. This is bad UI design.-
67%
miklkit1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
What do you think of this?
Reply
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0310/S00211.htm
There is more.......
-
-
Neutral
dissent1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
stupid or not i bet that a whole new bunch of her shows are going to be about just how stupid, if not rigged, these machines are.
Reply
it's about time too.(note the spelling). that's the kind of attention that should have been paid to them in 04
-
-
-
-
-
-
88%
lfergie8121 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Klarissa
Reply
There is widespread complaints about the touch screen voting machines. People have had problems with these voting machines in the last election in Ohio and Florida and now this one in WV, Tennessee, Texas, and Illinois. I hope that if Obama does get elected that the first thing that the new congress does is outlaw these voting machines without a paper trail.
http://machinist.salon.com/blog/2008/10/27/early_v... -
100%
cowboygrandpa1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Klarissa:
Reply
The machines are owned and operated by right wing lunatics, er I mean business men, yeah that's it business men whose job it is to make sure the neocons win !!!!!
So what would you call all the election fraud from the last two elections ???? Lies ??????
Beacuse that has been the song for 8 years now and the American patriots are tired of it !!!! And just like the patriots that set America free we will do it again. Preferrably by vote.
But if we are cheated out of our vote, well woe unto them that does it !!!
-
-
-
85%
Candida1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
RickyDawkins: "people take this presidential stuff wayyy to seriously..."
Reply
I hope you are joking Ricky. After all, it's only the future of your country, and to some extent the world, that's at stake here.
I just can't understand why Americans put up with these election machines? How much do they cost? What do they achieve? Is the tabulation of the results faster than with paper ballots? I don't think so. We have our results within hours, and the 2000 election results were delayed for weeks. What's even worse is that they breed distrust and hostility among the people.
Has anyone ever done a cost/benefit analysis on them? I doubt it. Otherwise they probably would have been thrown out long ago.-
20%
DeauxNut1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Don't you see the sarcasm aimed at all the really stupid and nonsense posts submitted only for the ilk that always finds something to comment about? All the same usual regulars. Next up will be Palin involvement in the busted machines.
Reply-
100%
truthiness1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"next up will be Palin involvement in the busted machines"
Reply
-I knew it! that whole hockey mom thing was just a fake out, she's really a computer programmer working on rigging the election. a ringer. that's what all that winking was about! damn you Palin!!!!
-
-
100%
memestryker1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
To put this in perspective, human and mechanical errors generally far outweigh electronic ones. Most of the newer machines don't spit out the card until you successfully register your vote, so it just takes watchful election judges to make sure you don't leave your card in the machine.
Reply
I predict states returning to paper will be sorry.
-
-
70%
donald511 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Ricky, you have no conscience... must be a repug!
Reply
If people took it seriously then over 1.2 million Iraqis might still be alive as well as over 4,ooo fine young Americans dead due to Dumya's lies!
Lost pensions, lost health care, lost homes, increased suicide, lost lives to needless wars... thanks to the Repugs! Repugs only concerned about losing a little money need to see the reality that it is a "life or death" issue!
No leader in history ever dropped taxes during a war, except Dumya to damn our economy too!-
-
0%
beavith11 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
nobody ever taught you to play nice in a sandbox, did they
Reply
i wonder how many americans would be alive if we just banned alcohol to stop drunk driving?
ummm... it was Bush and the Congressional leadership that rammed this bailout own our throats and democratic interference preventing regulatory overisght bills starting in 2003.
its not taxes that damned out economy. its peabrains like you. -
-
-
100%
memestryker1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I have to say I agree! /sarc
Reply
Oprah is just reminding them to pay attention. They went to electronic in the first place because paper ballots are not foolproof--humans end up getting even more involved, and that's never an improvement.
In this election, I'm not crazy about the candidates, since both are planning to continue or expand church-state entanglement, which I oppose, and I'm strongly for both gay rights and the second amendment.
At least these bozos aren't Bush.
-
-
81%
Spadecaller1 year, 1 month ago
-
78%
Spadecaller1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Who cares?
Reply
The entire world. Blacks, Hispanics, atheists, Catholics, Protestants, Baptists,Jews, patriots, Americans, Agnostics, homosexuals, democrats, republicans, conservatives, independents, Arabs, Muslims, Buddhists, liberals, voters,...
Who do you think does not care if Diebold, Sequoia, and ES & S select the next president?
How about: Neo-Nazis, neocons, skinheads, racists, white supremacists, dominionists, Sarah Palin, GEorge Bush, Dick Cheney, and John McCain?-
79%
cowboygrandpa1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
SC:
Reply
"Who do you think does not care if Diebold, Sequoia, and ES & S select the next president?
How about: Neo-Nazis, neocons, skinheads, racists, white supremacists, dominionists, Sarah Palin, GEorge Bush, Dick Cheney, and John McCain?"
Do not forget the corporate war mongerers, the munitions manufacturers, the oil companies, Bushes friends in Saudi Arabia, Fascists around the world and the free "no regulations needed" traders who seek to dominate the financial world and enslave us all !!!
Heil Bush/McCain/Palin?Cheney...... !!!!!!!!!! Welcome to the brave new world order of hell on earth being established by the false teachers and their followers !!!!!! The precursors to the anti Christ.-
-
-
75%
miklkit1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
So you work for diebold?
Reply
http://nightweed.com/20AmazingVotingFacts.html -
100%
cowboygrandpa1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Endo:
Reply
Name calling ??? Ummmmmm !!!!! Whom did I call a name ??????
People like me huh ?????? Hahahahaaaaaaaa !!!!
Well I'm glad you find a hard working honest man a threat !!!! Tells me all about what you find threatening. LOL
Hey if you fixed the machines will they dispense crap like you do ????
-
-
-
-
-
37%
Endoscopy1 year, 1 month ago
-
-
truthinessComment removed: Spam
-
-
-
75%
jordan111 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
As much as it sickens me, at least NOW people will pay attention to the fact that those GD machines have screwed with the vote for eight years! No one would listen, the CONS wouldn't investigate when they had all the power, the democrats were too stupid to make it a big issue after 06. But NOW, because someone with some influence experienced it.....NOW it will be an issue. Gawd, that pi**es me off!
Reply-
75%
lfergie8121 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
jordan11
Reply
The democrats did make an issue in the states that they had control of. The problem was the lack of a viable alternative.
Here is a voting machine in WV that keeps losing it's calibration and has to be fixed but after recalibration it still flips votes from Obama to McCain.
http://www.blackvoices.com/blogs/2008/10/29/voting...-
Neutral
jordan111 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I was speaking of the democrats at the federal level. This isn't a states issue, as what one state does or doesn't do affects the entire nation. The republicans addressed 'voter fraud' at a federal level to take the heat off of their pals machines. In their new 'law', if you register to vote & your name doesn't match exactly with data bases it is compared with, your registration gets thrown out. So if your SS# has your full name spelled out, and you put your first name, middle initial, and last name on the registration, you don't vote.
Reply
-
-
-
-
76%
cowboygrandpa1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Again there is the question ???? I'm telling you if McCain wins illegally like Bush did !!!!!! There are going to be some seriously distressed and angry citizens !!!!
Reply
How angry really depends on how well the exit polls are aligned with the outcome of the voting !!!!!!
Ya can't win if the devil is allowed to cheat his way in like Bush did !!!!!!-
-
83%
Radiofreeeuropa1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
SC, there is a really good article on the subject here-
Reply
http://www.propeller.com/story/2008/11/01/vote-fra...
from wired magazine...usually pro technology...not in this case.
-
-
21%
4thchance1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"How angry really depends on how well the exit polls are aligned with the outcome of the voting"
Reply
Have you forgotten? In the last election, most all the exit polls were saying KERRY winning by a land slide. So your exit poll idea is WORTHLESS TRIPE!
Exit Polls, the UN, Liberals...you're all kookoo!
Another point.
If you really beleive the republicans are able to win the elections by cheating, then how do you figure Obama or any Democrat will ever win another election? So by your theory of Repub election theft, you Dems are going to lose this election too.
So Sorry, Dems lose again!-
71%
miklkit1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Those exit polls were correct. They are a good way to measure just how many votes were stolen by you republicons. Here is a good read on that subject.
Reply
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/wa...-
44%
Endoscopy1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Exit polls are garbage. Too many people refuse to talk to the pollsters. Of those that do many lie to them for a variety of reasons. The result is not a random sampling of honest answers.
Reply
That is also true with the polls run now. They are heavy on Democrats. So they have some rules to try and hedge it to a correct number. One of the correction factors is how enthused you are over your candidate. This throws things off. Democrats are enthused by Obama. Republicans are not enthused too much over McCain but will crawl over ground glass to vote against Obama. They do not take that into account.-
-
-
60%
miklkit1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Here's another article for you. Scroll down to the bottom of the page for more good links.
Reply
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/2004votefraud.ht...
-
-
-
-
64%
cowboygrandpa1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
4thchance:
Reply
Thank you for showing the very reason most sane people know John Kerry won !!!!!
Ummmmmm !!! Election tampering, the neocon fall back when they can't lie their way in they steal it !!!!!!!
The American people as well as the world lost when Bush stole both elections !!!!
But hey enjoy your insanity dude you wear it well !!!!
LMAO hahahahaaaaaa-
-
50%
cowboygrandpa1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Endo:
Reply
Man, you are one funny dude !!!!
Now if the votes are screwed up there they have evidence linking you too it !!!!!!
But don't worry I'll tell them you couldn't have done it, You were right here flapping your gums. LOL
I'm sure they'll believe me after all I'm not a conservative liar !!!!!!!! LMAO hahahaahaahaaaa
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
sailrComment removed: Retracted by user24 Replies
-
-
-
67%
era1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I'm talking about the voter machines that are flipping votes.
Reply
Let's not forget 2000 when Bush was anointed by the supreme court because Katherine Harris stopped the recount in Florida.
The 2004 election results were also very suspect.The CEO of Diebold is on record saying he would deliver Ohio to George Bush.He made good on his promise.
No,Obama,,MSM,nor ACORN have the power to steal the election.
But we know it has been done.We have a right to be paranoid
-
-
-
78%
miklkit1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
No. You are the un-American.
Reply
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/wa... -
100%
era1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Stealing elections is shameful.
Reply
I'm against violence and not threatening to riot.
But I can assure you there will be alot of extemely unhappy people if this election is tampered with
Don't accuse me of being un-American!
You cons think you are the only patriots?
We will not allow it to happen again. -
sailrComment removed: Retracted by user
-
-
-
75%
Spadecaller1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The creeps from the voting machine companies better get ready for a quick trip to Russia, because enough people know what they have been up to.
Reply
I can see it now; these jerks are probably getting scared. Will they have to "adjust" the machines again to correct their fix?
I have seen these machines hop from one selection to another non-selected candidate. Enough Americans have witnessed this crap.
I can see the Boston Harbor filled with electronic voting machines come November 5yh, if the vote is skewed again.-
76%
cowboygrandpa1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
SC:
Reply
"I can see the Boston Harbor filled with electronic voting machines come November 5yh, if the vote is skewed again."
As well as the owners of the company who falsified the votes !!!!!!! There will be no letting go of it this time !!!!
Fair warning liars and cheats !!!!!!! Do not try to steal this election enough people already know McCain has lost !!!!!!!!!!
I'm a fairly peaceable man until you steal my countries constitutional government, and replace it with the bought and paid for neocon trash !!!!!!!!!!
2000 was not acceptable, 2004 was the fire that started the boil, 2008 will be the explosion that happens when steam is pressurized beyond the capacity of the vessel holding it. Kind of like a boiler letting loose, it will shake this nation !!!!!
There is the safety valve, a fair election !!!!
If McCain wins it honestly, I won't like it !!! But I'll live with it !!!!!!
But since the odds of that happening are about the same of us getting out of Iraq if he is elected. I'd say we should see Obama declared the winner right after the polls close in Hawaii -
-
-
76%
Spadecaller1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
SAVE OUR VOTE... for those who have not seen this video...
Reply
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9rZ9D-3ynY
Other reports of vote flipping:
http://www.bradblog.com/?page_id=6577 -
79%
Radiofreeeuropa1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
It's remarkable that we allow for this to occur. It's a fact that the last 2 presidential elections were hacked. I think our friend Ricky was being sarcastic though. There is a new report that links
Reply
Ohio vote tampering in the last presidential election to the same clowns who handled Bush Administration external e mails.
http://www.propeller.com/story/2008/11/01/document...
If Obama wins by say 51 to 49, you can be sure it's really 62-38. -
-
85%
tchef1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Here in Maryland we are doing away with the voting machines all together. We haven't even finished paying for them yet. I don't understand why they can't put a little printer on the machine that will print out your votes, you can then sign them and deposit them in a box like we did our original voting cards then you would have a verifiable recount source.
Reply-
77%
Radiofreeeuropa1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Absolutely! They have promised to do just that here in N.J. but sadly allegedly for budgetary reasons it has been postponed until Jan. (After the presidential election which blatantly sucks...) though if McCain wins here it will be too obvious a fraud, most of us NJ residents would cut off our hands before using them to "pull the lever" for a Republican fear mongering totalitarian piece of dung.
Reply -
80%
protoham1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Well you should not sign them, because it is suppose to be a secret ballot. But I agree, you should have to show a positive ID, You can use a computer if you want, but the end result would be a slip or page of paper that is scanned. The scanners would have to be verified by members of both parties. Or they could be hand counted.
Reply
This could be a very simple system, but the key is the paper ballot that is human readable. -
ClockworkorangeComment removed: Abusive1 Reply
-
81%
orndorffter1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Tchef; Do you remember the 2000 Election? Al Gore won that election fair and square, but Bushed cryed and said my brother in Florida said I was the winner, then all the crap we had to go thaough for days, and they gave it to Bush even after they found boxes of Al Gores votes strung up and down the ocean bank beside phone boths and other places there were boxes of his votes that they just put along the road side and every where. I sure hope this does not end up another one of those days, That was wrong very wrong, but I think people like you and I are aware fo those days and maybe, just maybe there won't be another day like that again. Because they well do what ever that got to, to make our vote not count.
Reply -
88%
Candida1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
tchef: "you can then sign them and deposit them in a box like we did our original voting cards then you would have a verifiable recount source."
Reply
Unless I'm mistaken, votes are anonymous, so you can't sign them. What was wrong with your original voting cards? -
-
HewGeeRekshunComment removed: Retracted by user
-
-
Neutral
memestryker1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
tchef, the problems with mistakes and fraud were huge with paper and are probably less with the electronic machines. But the conspiracy theorists are hot on this.
Reply
And I agree, there is nothing stopping them from doing this. The programming would be straightforward, and it would be much better than the paper ballots.
-
-
94%
Poulenc1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Of course one should always be...vigilant about fraud. It's a buyer-beware situation, really.
Reply
In New York City, where I live, one registers one's vote using a very primitive mechanical contraption: you push a large lever to open the curtains of the both, mark your choices by flipping small levers allowing X's to pop up in actual tiny windows opposite candidates' names, then seal the deal by returning the lever to it's original position, which also opens the curtains so you can exit. Very 1954.
I've often wondered: is any of this connected to anything? The mechanical sounds of the machine are impressive, but...
I mean, what's the means by which the votes are actually recorded?
I'll accept all answers.-
-
-
81%
Radiofreeeuropa1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I believe those mechanical devices have a good record, we used them in NJ until 2004, the reason for the switch? allegedly repairs were too costly. The E machines we use now are wholly unreliable and 1st year computer students at Princeton were able to hack them in under 60 seconds, let alone the likelihood of the manufacturer's collusion with the GOP. I would feel much better about using the mechanical machines than these ridiculous no paper trail touch screens- incidentally could it really cost more to maintain those older mechanical machines
Reply
than purchase these democracy prevention devices? NO! These machines cost over 4,000 apiece dollars to buy, but the cost of the (not optional) service that makes them work provided from the manufacturer doubles the cost. These things are just another example of the rape of America by GOP apocalyptic, bathroom-sex-seeking, wackjobs.
Have a look at what happened in Maryland, they are dumping the things even though they wasted a fortune on them.
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/04/the-cost-...-
100%
Candida1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Radiofreeeuropa: "we used them in NJ until 2004, the reason for the switch? allegedly repairs were too costly."
Reply
We have an even older method: a piece of paper and a pencil, with no maintenance costs. Well, the pencils get used up after a few elections and they have to be sharpened once in a while. The system is almost 100% reliable and temper-proof, and results are available within a couple of hours after the polls close. Party representatives observe the count, and a 3rd grader can do the recount, if necessary. -
-
Neutral
riverdog1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I may not be just the actual voting machines, but a middle man server that the tallied votes are sent to first, before sending them on to the Sec. of States. Where do these servers exist? In the battleground States of course! If McCain wins it will be by a very thin margin so as to not look obvious. Check out videos on youtube by internet security expert Stanley Spoonamore and regarding the shifty IT guy Michael Connell who was IT man for Rove, Bush and now McCain. Spoonamore predicts a McCain win by 51.5% - stolen votes via middle man server which is untracable. I hope he is wrong.
Reply
-
-
-
82%
protoham1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I have used those machines, they click counters in the rear depending which leaver you pushed down. The counters were manually read and logged at the end of the day. This was basically a mechanical calculator. I have no idea how reliable they are, but I suspect they were.
Reply -
71%
italymeetsdixie1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Where I live in VA, we have two kinds of voting. There are several touch screen voting machines, and the lines are always empty. Our people don't like them. We also have paper ballots that are read by a machine. If our vote is within a few percentage points the actual paper ballots are counted, for verification. Then they report the numbers for each precinct.
Reply
But the paper ballots are counted and verified anyway after that, just to be sure that the machines were accurate.
Our district is doing away with the touch screens because we refuse to use them.
Also we have co registrars, one democrat and one republican.
-
-
-
ClockworkorangeComment removed: Abusive1 Reply
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12%
kickdrum11 year, 1 month ago
-
75%
Ciera-Marie1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
protoham come on, Illinois is one of many states where citizens can vote early. Give me a break. (I seriously did click on the blue reply to link.)
Reply
********
RFE Good to see you? How's it going? protoham ignored your comment and the other comment on the thread that listed all the states where voting can be done early. Thank God for that.-
raats6662Comment removed: Retracted by user
-
-
-
-
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive
-
-
sailrComment removed: Retracted by user
-
63%
donald511 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Kick, are you the idiot who hasn't watched any news to see the 5 to 6 hour waits in Florida & Georgia for early voting?
Reply
I live in Alabama where there is no early voting and all we ever hear here are repug lies on every commercial and local news broadcasts! No wonder this deluded state voted for Dumya 2 out of 3 last time! No wonder we send self-professed racists like Jeffery Beauregard Sessions,III, to washington repeately! Racist Sessions? Sure, he even admitted his racism to the Senate Judiciary when Reagan nominated him to a judgeship so he didn't even make a floor vote! -
-
29%
FairNBalanced1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Why would a representative ask Oparah why she was going back to check her ballad? That does not even sound right. That sounds like she was not given privacy. That could be looked upon as harassment in a different scenario.
Reply
I went back to double check my selections. Doesn't everyone? If a worker came over to ask me why I was going back, I would be offended and probably feel like I was being rushed.
If you are not diligent and double check who you have voted for, then you probably don't need to be voting in the first place.
And if the poll workers are asking why your going back to check your selections, then they are not doing anything to help you. They are hindering your time at the booth and I think that is very disturbing. -
-
80%
not2needy1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Actually i don't think many of the poll workers are really volunteers.. Here, everyone who works the polls are paid 120.00 for the day!
Reply
That said, regardless of whether it voluntarily or paid, it's their job to assist voters.. The problem probably comes in when they know you're not voting for their party!
-
-
83%
cowboygrandpa1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Tango57:
Reply
Can we say riots, mass demonstrations, refusal to accept the lies !!!!!!!!
Can we say Bush trying to impose martial law to maintain his beloved dictatorship !!!!!!!
Sadly I can see violence, something I never want in this country again !!!!!
But freedom must win out !!!!!!!!!! If our votes don't count, then they are saying we are no longer Americans with the right to choose or leaders and we need to address that in the most direct manner we can !!!!! With our voices and actions !!!!! -
80%
Tango571 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
It will be more than interesting Tuesday night. Even though I know Obama currently holds 53% of all votes and has more than clinched the electoral votes, I'm anxious that somehow they will announce McCain as the winner. Here in Texas, a historic red state has turned blue over the last 2 weeks in early historic voter turnout. Obama leads at 53%. If they announce McCain as the winner, it will get ugly, real ugly..
Reply-
-
67%
jaern1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
We still have a few days for an "emergency or act of terrorism" to take place.
Reply
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060814/gillers -
-
-
-
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive
-
-
-
-
33%
RedstateLib1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I am prepared. Both guns are loaded and ready riot away. By the way we voted early also. I am sure the McKinney/Clemente ticket will be pleased to know that they got two votes that would have gone to Obama if it had not been for those sexist pigs at his events and his failure to call them out. If Sarah Palin is a CUN# what does that make Mrs Obama?
Reply
-
-
100%
Mdiar1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Texas will go for McCain. If Obama wins Texas we are approaching about 460 electoral votes for Obama. His realistic ceiling is about 400. Early voting is a sign of enthusiasm, not how the actual vote will go. Normally Republicans lead. The current early-voting numbers suggest that the Democratic Party will have a higher turnout then the Republican.
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive2 Replies
-
67%
orndorffter1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
FairNBalanced; What did you do, did you go to the site of Hillbuzz I read what those guys said about the leaver on the voting machine, and I also read how many are ploting with these guys. 3 hour I went over and over how they were going to do this.
Reply
-
-
-
29%
4thchance1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The headline to this story should be printed to be accurate, like this.
Reply
OPRAH IS TO DUMB TO KNOW HOW TO OPERATE AN ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINE!
Be sure you all read the article before you run with the tripe posts you see here.
Opera didn't operate the voting machine correctly as she was instructed to do. Her vote wasn't counted because she did nopt operate the machine correctly.-
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive1 Reply
-
-
-
80%
OldBetty1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Even people who don't like Oprah know that she isn't dumb. The point is if she made the mistake, others might make it too. She never implied it was a conspiracy of any kind, she just urged people to check the selections over before submitting to avoid a mistake.
Reply
-
-
73%
Spadecaller1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I have noticed that most neocons (like 4thchance) use the same sick thinking; they like to blame the victims of crime and corruption for the crime itself to free themselves from taking any responsibility for their lack of concern for their fellow Americans. A sad lot, for sure.
Reply
Thank God that even most McCain supporters are embarrassed by them. -
-
64%
donald511 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Yes, it is ridiculous that an American would call someone losing their vote "ridiculous" - how Un-American of you! But, typically repug of you, the party of terrorism through torture, eavesopping w/o a warrant, Gitmo and preemptive war for lies!
Reply -
-
-
0%
william-sire1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Yes I am a "reluctant" McCain supporter, as if my avatar wasn't a dead give away. The problem with this "fair play" is that it was so predictable. first the fictitious voter registrations now this idiotic story. In case Obama doesn't win he is setting what ever is necessary to distract america into another supreme battle with hopes for him to come out after winner, post the election rresults.
Reply
-
-
30%
Lazlol1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I hope you guys aren't too disillusioned with the polls that are in Obama's favor. In reality, I have been making calls for the past week and the majority of the people I have talked to are either voting for McCain or are leaning McCain. There haven't been a lot of Obama supporters. This just makes me wonder about the polls.
Reply-
-
-
83%
Candida1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Lazlol: "I have been making calls for the past week and the majority of the people I have talked to are either voting for McCain or are leaning McCain."
Reply
What you are saying may be true but still not reflect the truth. What kind of responses you get depends to a large extent on whom you call and to a smaller extent on what kinds of questions you ask. Were you taking a random sample of registered or likely voters? (BTW, random doesn't mean haphazard.)
-
-
80%
truthiness1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
with 2 days and 2 hours to go gallup has Obama up 52 to 41 among all registered voters and 52 to 42 among likely voters.
Reply
say what you want about ACORN but mickey mouse isn't responding to gallup polls.
no one has ever come back from a double digit deficit in the polls at this point in the election.
of course a black man has never asked to be put in charge of all the guns and money before either.
so we shall see.
but I would have trouble believing a mccain win was anything but criminal.-
33%
Lazlol1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
That's just one poll. Zogby has McCain up by one point and Rasmussen has Obama up by five. So McCain wouldn't be coming back from a double digit deficit. And he's gaining momentum. So it is possible that McCain could pull off a victory.
Reply
Also, McCain is within four points of Obama in Pennsylvania, according to Rasmussen. McCain just might pull it off.-
83%
truthiness1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"this is the 37th straight day that Obama’s support has been between 50% and 52"
Reply
-Rasmussen 11/1/08
they and zogby have a 5 point lead today. over a month with a majority of the vote. of course Gore and kerry both had a majority of the popular vote, they just didn't get the election. a fact which i still find baffling and insulting.-
100%
memestryker1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Except Obama already has the electoral votes. The electoral college was set up to make sure national interests that might not be as obvious to the majority were heard (like farmers, who at one time provided all the food for this country and later for many others).
Reply
-
-
-
sailrComment removed: Retracted by user
-
-
-
-
-
PainesrightComment removed: Spam
-
-
-
71%
OldBetty1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
People -- don't post a comment until you read or listen to the whole original source. This was about a voter with a high profile who made a mistake and was using her position with the media to caution other voters to double check their choices before submitting them. End of story.
Reply -
Neutral
bill-smith1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Wow, there's a dearth of informed discussion on this thread. It's almost enough to make me claim to not be a member of the electorate. Some of you are really, REALLY doing a great disservice to yourselves, your parties, and your country in general.
Reply
And we wonder why our country's going to heck in a hand basket. -
-
0%
bill-smith1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Sir, I don't think that I'm better than you or others. All I'm saying is that with the possible future of our country at stake take a look at the comments of the people on this thread. Is this really the intelligent kind of debate that will bring about the change that we need in our country? Is this the best we can do? Is it? If it is I weep for our future.
Reply
Call me arrogant if you will but I expect more from you and others.
-
-
-
Neutral
nostalgia1 year, 1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Congress rushed to pass the HELP AMERICA VOTE ACT OF 2002 to replace punch card voting systems
Reply
Even with all of the problems they have failed to correct the problems and in many cases made the situation worse
This is a good site to read about the history of what has been going on in Congress in recent years rearding the voting system
http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_c...
loading ...
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.