« Back to story "On Voting for the Lesser of Evils"

Comments for On Voting for the Lesser of Evils »

Posted By austin356 1 year ago in Political News

The lesser of evils is still evil.

Read Full Story at unitedliberty.org »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 17
- Display
  • 100%
    berkeley1 year ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    w.e.b. dubois spoke to the lesser of two evils argument almost a century ago. it was evil then and it's evil now.

    working for proportional voting is one step we can all take to break the lock the two parties have.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      Natureboy1 year ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      U so right.

      Beyond that, we need to shift decision-making down the heirarchic ladder in any way we can. Part of the problem with America is simply this - our federalist system, with much of the power concentrated at the national level, is simply too much power in too small a place, and that power draws elitists, greedheads and opportunists like crap draws flies.

      Whatever. We have a lot of work to do. Voting people into power won't help, to the degree that the problem is structural. As an anarcho friend observed, "no gain in voting the bastards out if what you vote them out of doesn't change."

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        rightfromwrong1 year ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Proportional voting would give some power to people that they can't control....this would be a good thing.
        Unfortunately America is too far down the road of corporate fascism whereby all the money keeps funneling to the rich. This allows them to buy more companies,downsize and buy off politicians.
        Obama will be a slight change but the strategy of the USA will not change much....with 120military bases and through the corrupt practices of the World bank and IMF continue to use their forces to prop up petty dictators who will turn over their resources to the multi-nationals. Exploitation maximized!!!!
        This will pit them against the Chinese more as they also require resources. However the Chinese have a totally different approach. They will help develop the infrastructure in return for access to their resources. If I was in power and a just person who cared for the people of the country I would certainly show bias towards the Chinese plan.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
      • 100%
        tadair9191 year ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        How about Instant Runoff Voting? It's the system they use in Spain, and in Parliaments, and some counties around the United States.

        Basically, an IRV system makes it so they tally all the first-choice votes, and if there is no clear winner then they remove last place from the ballot and keep re-tallying everybody's next vote until there is one.

        Had we have had this system in 2000, then Nader would have gotten his votes home, without the risk of being painted a black sheep.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          KISA452a1 year ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          The only possible rescue for the US is alternative parties. I was recently asked how to get them a chance. I'm not sure. Who is actually working on it?

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
          Reply

          6 Replies

          loading loading ...
          • 100%
            Natureboy1 year ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Third parties can help. Historically though, once a third party ascends to power, it becomes as corrupt as the one it replaced. Consider that the Republican party began as a progressive, anti-racist third party. And look at what it has become.

            Other posters above are right - ranked preference or IRV voting would radically transform the electoral landscape, and give third parties a voice. But the duopoly holds power, and they stand to lose if these reforms are implemented. So it is doubtful we will have anything but the status quo in the immediate future.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
            Reply

            1 Reply

            loading loading ...
            • Neutral
              KISA452a1 year ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              I think it would just take 2-3 senators. They would hold the key (in the last senate) to getting ANYTHING done. Make it 5-7 and you'd still have the keys this time.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
            • 100%
              Mdiar1 year ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              Have the third parties work at local levels, not national. Make them regional at first. Gain control of a few towns, counties and so on. Then work on state elections. After you have had a few Governors in a couple of states start running Presidential candidates. You might take a state or two. Minnesota is a good place to start, IMO. After you take a state or two its alot tougher to be made fun of. Runoff ballots and proportional representation work great as well. I think a change in how third parties do things combined with election reforms would make powerful third parties in the US.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
              Reply

              3 Replies

              loading loading ...
              • 100%
                KISA452a1 year ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                "Have the third parties work at local levels, not national." Tha'ts what I've said for years. Must be where I live that it doesn't seem to progress :(

                But without public financing and inclusion in debates, there is essentially not possibility for significantly affecting the presidential election.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                Reply

                2 Replies

                loading loading ...
                • Neutral
                  ETproductions1 year ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  I can't recall the last city council debate I watched, and I am a political junkie. The Obama Campaign can be broken down to show how to organize a ground game and build small donor support to get started.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                  Reply

                  1 Reply

                  loading loading ...
                  • 100%
                    KISA452a1 year ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    God help me :( I think I may be agreeing with ETproductions and Mdair.

                    *checks into psychiatric unit*

                    ;-)

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                    Reply
                    loading loading ...
            • Neutral
              NoWayMan1 year ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              the lesser of two evils my arse.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              • Neutral
                Ratskii1 year ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                Why vote for the lessor of two evils? Vote for complete and all encompassing evil: Emperor Palatine/Cuthulu for president/vice president in 2012. Don't settle for less. ;-)

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                Reply
                loading loading ...

                Add a Comment

                Sign In With Your Propeller Account

                Forgot your password?

                Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

                To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.