Food banks see more need, fewer donations »
Posted By BronxBomber 1 year ago in News
The economic downturn triggered by the worst financial crisis in decades is sending more Americans to food banks. But the crisis has also cut donations from companies and individuals, according to a survey for Feeding America, the largest U.S. relief organization.
Read Full Story at reuters.com »
959 Views Share Story 13 Comments Report
Submitted By:
BronxBomber
Hello!
Welcome to my profile!
(Pardon the ambiance, but it's the maid's day off)
(Please also check my ‘submissions’ and prop vote them ...
Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentComments So Far: 20 (view all)
-
-
-
100%
orndorffter1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
This is a good story, soon they well probly be doing away with the food banks because the cost of food,and the more people who goes it just gets harder for people to buy food for the food bank and for themselfs. But if anyone ever came to me hungery, I would do my best to make sure they were not hungery when they left. I cant stand the thought of someone going to bed hungery. very good story.
Reply -
-
100%
PinkyPie1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I once heard that if a person went to the back door of a restaurant and said they were hungry the restaurant was obliged to give them something to eat...even if it was just some bread. This doesn't seem logical or even legal but I'm curious if anyone else has ever heard this. I've also heard something along the same lines regarding giving water to someone who may come to your door, even if it's just pointing them to the garden hose. It sounds odd, but has anyone else ever heard of anything like this? It was many years ago when the homeless population was much smaller so it seemed a little more plausible at the time. Now it would seem that it could put a restaurant quickly out of business if true.
Reply-
-
100%
kobzikov1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I've heard something quite different not too long ago.
Reply
http://abcnews.go.com/WN/PersonOfWeek/Story?id=412... -
100%
Natureboy1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
That used to be the ethic, I think. Never a law, just something that kind, caring people did.
Reply
I sure as hell would never refuse water to someone who was thirsty. And I would feed them if I could.
And then I would hand them some seeds, and lead them to a vacant lot.... -
100%
chevydog1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
pinky --Don't think that this was law; but probably something that many came to expect. I have one son who works at an upscale restaurant. He observes that they throw out quite a bit of food that maybe could be given to local pantries. But he also notes that there are all sorts of regs on cooked food -- how long it can be stored, how it must be stored, how it must be packed, etc. -- that managment figures it's just easier to pitch it. Another lesson in the law of unintended consequences , I guess.
Reply
-
-
BlueAutumn_1989Comment removed: Retracted by user1 Reply
-
-
100%
lvrofwolves1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
See that's just it, damn near everyone can afford to give or share something.
Reply
And I agree with Natureboy-We should never complain about the idle poor, considering how much it costs us to support the idle rich.
People want to complain about supporting some woman living in low income housing, driving a crappy car if any, eating ramen noodles for dinner,getting sub standard health care, and most likely working hard at a minimum wage job yet turn a blind eye to the millions given to the rich that need help keeping their mansions, luxury cars,boats,dinner parties, top shelf,vacations, best medical care etc...
So the wallstreet people were concerned about their bonuses this year which I think is an average of 138,000 -236,000 per person, they were going to have to lower it by 70%, but with the bailout they only have to lower those bonuses by 30%
I realize there are a lot of wealthy people who give to charities etc....and I don't want to take that feel good moment or tax break for them, but come on, America caters to the wealthy way too much.
I think percentage wise, the 'un' wealthy give more then the wealthy do.
-
-
100%
ONEBADMAMAWOLF1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Part of the problem of giving to food banks is all the rules, if you hunt and want to donate meat, it has to have been shot with bow and arrow, no bullets because of "LEAD POISENING" possibility. Resturants do not donate food, because if the people who eat it get sick, even if its the food banks fault , cause they didn't store properly, or for too long, the resturant can get sued. Grocery stores used to give food at the back doors when it came up on last day to sell date, not anymore, cause again they get sued if someone gets sick. I , myself donate all the time, fruit and veggys from my own garden, and some meat, (I raise my own). I pick-up extra toiletrys evertime I go shopping and donate those also. There will come a time when I will no longer be able to do this, due to the economy, but I hope there will be others .
Reply
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.