« Back to story "Bush In Race Against Time To Wreck Country"

Story Comments

Posted by: Endoscopy 1 year, 1 month ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 0%
    Endoscopy1 year, 1 month ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    You forget they admitted to lobbying to modify the CRA standards and did it in 1992. You just do not want to admit that they did it. You first refused to believe that were anything but a voter registration organization. Foolish lib.

    They say it but you ignore it. Just have to keep your blinders on. They are a very liberal organization with tentacles in a lot of things. The compassion of mortgages was their concern in the housing market. Red lining is just a way of saying the banks were not allowed to ask for money down and could not examine the income of the people asking for a loan. What happens when you go for a loan. How much down is required and what proof of income do they ask for? But the banks are not allowed to do that for the poor. Then you compassionate liberals wonder why the foreclosures came. Foolish libs.

    Legislative changes 1992 to CRA (ACORN)

    Although not part of the CRA, in order to achieve similar aims the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 required Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two government sponsored enterprises that purchase and securitize mortgages, to devote a percentage of their lending to support affordable housing.

    In October 2000, in order to expand the secondary market for affordable community-based mortgages and to increase liquidity for CRA-eligible loans, Fannie Mae committed to purchase and securitize $2 billion of "MyCommunityMortgage" loans. In November 2000 Fannie Mae announced that the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) would soon require it to dedicate 50% of its business to low- and moderate-income families." It stated that since 1997 Fannie Mae had done nearly $7 billion in CRA business with depository institutions, but its goal was $20 billion. In 2001 Fannie Mae announced that it had acquired $10 billion in specially-targeted Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) loans more than one and a half years ahead of schedule, and announced its goal to finance over $500 billion in CRA business by 2010, about one third of loans anticipated to be financed by Fannie Mae during that period.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    3 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      Jeboba1 year, 1 month ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      and in 2002, PRESIDENT GEORE W. BUSH pushed it even further! Prior to HIS push, everything was pretty well in balance.

      http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/06/20...

      Endo, you can't rationalize your way around this one. My wife remembers when Bush did this that the 'liar loans' etc. started. She predicted our current condition then and she was right.

      So if you REALLY want to tell the truth for a change, you can blame your hero BUSH!

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        Jeboba1 year, 1 month ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Uh, Endo, You forgot one thing. ACORN lobbied in 1992 and was successful and who controlled congress at the time? REPUBLICANS you idiot!

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          Jeboba1 year, 1 month ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Endo, if you continue to 'cherry pick' your facts, we will continue to throw it back to you and disprove your hypotheses. Get it?

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply
          loading loading ...

        Post Reply

        You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

        People Who Liked This Comment (0)

        No one voted this comment positively. Is it really that bad of a comment?

        People Who Didn't Like This Comment (4)