Story Comments
Posted by: Radiofreeeuropa 1 year ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
96%
Radiofreeeuropa1 year ago
-
86%
mcgrievysr1 year ago
-
25%
b-happy1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
OMG she is at a turkey farm!!!!! I can't believe it. What an evil person she is. Never mind the millions of people who eat Turkey. She is the evil one who likes to kill everything unlike everyone else. I mean they don't kill it, they just eat it. So she is horrible and disgusting but everyone else is ok.
Reply
Get a life people. I would think that you would be over your hate for Sarah Palin but this lady somehow scares you guys into running bogus story's like this.
To show how stupid people are, 80% of the people think Sarah Palin said she could see Russia from her house when it was actually SNL that made that up. 70% knew that Sarah Palin had a baby but couldn't name the three arms of government. Next time you call her an idiot just look in their mirror.-
88%
Progressive1 year ago
-
44%
lovemylibs1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You can see Russia from Alaska, as long as your Berings are Strait.
Reply
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bering_Strait.j...
Left side = Russia Right side = Alaska-
100%
Progressive1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?
Reply
PALIN: They're our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.
GIBSON: What insight does that give you into what they're doing in Georgia?
PALIN: Well, I'm giving you that perspective of how small our world is and how important it is that we work with our allies to keep good relation with all of these countries, especially Russia. We will not repeat a Cold War. We must have good relationship with our allies, pressuring, also, helping us to remind Russia that it's in their benefit, also, a mutually beneficial relationship for us all to be getting along.-
-
-
-
75%
ybdogsct1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
CAJUNCHAMP:
Reply
"Palin never said it gives her credentials or even hinted that it does."
Is that so? Well, spin this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nokTjEdaUGg
"COURIC: You've cited Alaska's proximity to Russia as part of your foreign policy experience. What did you mean by that?
PALIN: That Alaska has a very narrow maritime border between a foreign country, Russia, and on our other side, the land-- boundary that we have with-- Canada. It-- it's funny that a comment like that was-- kind of made to-- cari-- I don't know, you know? Reporters--
COURIC: Mock?
PALIN: Yeah, mocked, I guess that's the word, yeah.
COURIC: Explain to me why that enhances your foreign policy credentials.
PALIN: Well, it certainly does because our-- our next door neighbors are foreign countries. They're in the state that I am the executive of. And there in Russia--
COURIC: Have you ever been involved with any negotiations, for example, with the Russians?
PALIN: We have trade missions back and forth. We-- we do-- it's very important when you consider even national security issues with Russia as Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where-- where do they go? It's Alaska. It's just right over the border. It is-- from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right there. They are right next to-- to our state. "
-
-
-
-
-
-
33%
Endoscopy1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
ROTFLMAO
Reply
That is a lie that is going around. You sick libs just have to tell your lies and repeat them long enough that you actually believe them. Did you even bother to read the post you are responding to????
"To show how stupid people are, 80% of the people think Sarah Palin said she could see Russia from her house when it was actually SNL that made that up."
Your ignorance is breathtaking.-
-
89%
ybdogsct1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
BHAPPY:
Reply
"To show how stupid people are, 80% of the people think Sarah Palin said she could see Russia from her house when it was actually SNL that made that up."
ENDOSCOPY:
"ROTFLMAO. That is a lie that is going around. You sick libs just have to tell your lies and repeat them long enough that you actually believe them."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nokTjEdaUGg
"COURIC: You've cited Alaska's proximity to Russia as part of your foreign policy experience. What did you mean by that?
PALIN: That Alaska has a very narrow maritime border between a foreign country, Russia, and on our other side, the land-- boundary that we have with-- Canada. It-- it's funny that a comment like that was-- kind of made to-- cari-- I don't know, you know? Reporters--
COURIC: Mock?
PALIN: Yeah, mocked, I guess that's the word, yeah.
COURIC: Explain to me why that enhances your foreign policy credentials.
PALIN: Well, it certainly does because our-- our next door neighbors are foreign countries. They're in the state that I am the executive of. And there in Russia--
COURIC: Have you ever been involved with any negotiations, for example, with the Russians?
PALIN: We have trade missions back and forth. We-- we do-- it's very important when you consider even national security issues with Russia as Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where-- where do they go? It's Alaska. It's just right over the border. It is-- from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right there. They are right next to-- to our state. "
CAJUNCHAMP:
"Ignorance is bliss ya know?!"
You don't say...
*Sigh*
http://www.local6.com/education/2540402/detail.htm...
http://www.alec.org/am/pdf/2007_ALEC_Education_Rep...
Of the top 5 states with the HIGHEST academic achievement, 4 vote DEMOCRATIC (Minnesota, Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire). Of the bottom 10 states with the WORST academic achievement, 7 vote REPUBLICAN(Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, West Virginia, Arkansas, Georgia, South Carolina).
http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/departments/elearnin...
Of the top 5 "SMARTEST states," 4 vote DEMOCRATIC (Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey). Of the 10 DUMBEST states, 8 vote REPUBLICAN (West Virginia, Kentucky, Mississippi, Arkansas, Alabama, Louisiana, Tennessee, Oklahoma).
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcg...
"U.S. medical students are considerably more likely to be liberal than conservative and are more likely to be liberal than are other young U.S. adults. Among these medical students, 5% self-characterized as politically very conservative, 21% conservative, 31% liberal, and 9% as very liberal.”
http://www.gallup.com/poll/106381/Obama-Education-...
"Barack Obama leads John McCain by a significant margin among voters with the most education. McCain leads Obama among those with the least education. Thus, it appears that Obama's strong showing among educated voters in the Democratic nomination contest would extend to the general election as well."
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/sta...
"College graduates are more likely to vote Democrat than Republican by a 53% to 46% margin. Those with postgraduate degrees are more likely to vote Democrat than Republican by a 58% to 41% margin."-
-
75%
ybdogsct1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
CAJUNCHUMP:
Reply
"The issue is that Palin said that she can SEE Russia and that gives her foreign policy credentials. She NEVER SAID that whatsoever. That's the issue. She never said that to Couric either."
You must be a glutton for punishment. Sarah Palin IN HER OWN WORDS ON VIDEOTAPE.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nokTjEdaUGg
"COURIC: You've cited Alaska's proximity to Russia as part of your foreign policy experience. What did you mean by that?...Explain to me why that enhances your foreign policy credentials.
PALIN: Well, it certainly does because our-- our next door neighbors are foreign countries. They're in the state that I am the executive of. And there in Russia--"
Each fatuous comment you post simply serves to dig your grave deeper and deeper. Must be that world renown neocon mis-education.
LOL.
Pathetic.-
25%
CajunChamp1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Yes it is quite pathetic that you refuse to understand her answer. Her creds are not based on "seeing Russia from her window" and THAT is the issue. You simply cannot judge the issue based on a Couric interview, you have to look at the entire situation and subsequent interviews to understand. Your failure to do this is what is pathetic. Have you ever taken the time to discover exactly what trade missions Alaska has been involved with regarding Russia? However, as an aside, trading with JUST Russia, IMHO, does not give one 100% credentials but at least it's a start in the right direction.
Reply-
50%
ybdogsct1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
CAJUNCHUMP:
Reply
"Her creds are not based on "seeing Russia from her window" and THAT is the issue."
WRONG.
That is NOT the issue. The issue is whether PROXIMITY TO RUSSIA ALONE qualifies as "foreign policy credentials." Palin bandies about buzzwords like "national security," yet there is absolutely NO RECORD of her using the governor's office to protect our national security from Russia, there is NO RECORD of her issuing an executive order as commander of the Alaskan National Guard to protect our national security, and there is even NO RECORD of Palin owning a passport for foreign travel before this year.
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/sep/06/nation/na-...
"Can you tell me one decision that she made as commander in chief of the Alaska National Guard?' CNN journalist Campbell Brown asked Monday while interviewing McCain campaign spokesman Tucker Bounds. 'Just one?'
'But the governor has no command authority overseas -- or anywhere in the United States other than Alaska,' says Maj. Gen. Craig Campbell, the service commander of the Alaska National Guard.
Occasions in which Palin does retain command authority over the 4,200-member Alaska National Guard are whenever the guard responds to in-state natural disasters and civic emergencies. 'For example, out west and northwest we had erosion problems and the National Guard was involved in some of the protection out there. About three days ago, the Army National Guard picked up a lady from Little Diomede ... at the request of state troopers.'
Did Palin directly approve each of those activities?
'No,' Campbell said. The governor has granted him authority to act on his own in most cases, including life-or-death emergencies when a quick response is required, or minor day-to-day operations."
CAJUNCHUMP:
"Have you ever taken the time to discover exactly what trade missions Alaska has been involved with regarding Russia?"
LOL. Trade missions? You clearly don't know what the hell you're talking about.
Spin this.
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Did_Palin_lie_about_...
"Did Palin lie about 'trade missions' with Russia?
In a Thursday interview with Katie Couric, Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin cited "trade missions" with Russia as her one tangible piece of foreign policy experience.
What trade missions?
Research doesn't show a single Alaska-Russia trade mission since former Democratic governor Tony Knowles visited Siberia in 1997, when Palin was running Wasilla. When the reporter asked gubernatorial spokeswoman Kate Morgan about this issue, she refused to answer."
http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/09/26/...
"As you might notice, Palin only cites one discernible foreign interaction under her purview: Trade missions. I spent some time on the Governor's Web site seeking more details about her trade negotiations with Russia. There's a press release about Gov. Palin's meeting with a trade mission from the Yukon, but nothing about Russia anywhere in the archives. Tony Knowles, a Democrat who was governor from 1994-2002, led a trade mission -- back in 1997, while Palin was running Wasilla. That seems to be about it for Russia-Alaska trade missions lately.
When asked for examples of trade missions with Russia that have taken place under Palin's watch, gubernatorial spokeswoman Kate Morgan refused to answer the question."
LOL!
PATHETIC.-
50%
MotiGui1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Man o man, what a freaking moron you are and dense as a steel marble. I am ashamed to call myself a democrat that voted for Obama in light of your ignorance.
Reply
Palin is commander in chief of the 49th, she doesn't have to give an executive order to assume that role as that is the job of the actual commander himself. It's much the same as the President of the U.S. Do you think he gives executive orders to the military to carry out tactical maneuvers? The title goes with the job.
However, she is briefed from time to time on top secret issues involving the 49th and with that she has a higher security clearance than Obama does up until the time he's sworn in.
Do you have any clue at all what the role of the 49th is? Maybe you'll sleep a little better if you know.
As far as her policy credentials are concerned but after I saw both the Gibson and Couric interviews I thought much the same as everyone else, "what is it with this idiot", until I was curious enough to do some deep investigation. What I found out was quite surprising as to her credentials and then it made some sense in the interviews. Her "words" were not exactly what I would call accurate but nonetheless worthy of investigation. Go searching yourself and take that stupid pyramid off your head for once.
No need to reply, I'm outta here.-
100%
ybdogsct1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
MOTIGUI:
Reply
"Palin is commander in chief of the 49th, she doesn't have to give an executive order to assume that role as that is the job of the actual commander himself."
Wow. You are clearly illiterate. Let me explain it again, using small words this time so that even someone as fatuous as you can understand.
NOBODY is claiming that an executive order had to be issued to give Palin command of the Alaskan National Guard. First, get that through your thick skull.
Palin claims that her role as nominal commander of the National Guard qualifies as "national security experience." However, "experience" means more than just a job title.
According to the Oxford English Dictionary, "experience" means "practical knowledge gained over the course of an encounter." In other words, acquiring "experience" involves being placed in a situation that involves decision-making and living/learning with the consequences of your decisions. Experience means being able to point to a successful track record of decision-making, being able to say that you've been in these situations before, and being able to say what practical knowledge you've learned from these situations. THAT is "experience."
Palin certainly had the authority to command the National Guard, but was never in a situation that involved her to make an executive decision as commander of the National Guard. In fact, there is NO RECORD of her making ANY executive decisions in her role as nominal commander of the National Guard. As the article that I quoted and that you NEGLECTED to read in full demonstrates, someone else made these decisions for her.
Likewise, as governor, Palin also had the authority to conduct trade missions with Russia, just as the former Democratic governor Tony Knowles did. However, since there is NO RECORD of her actually conducting any trade missions (in fact, there's NO RECORD of Palin even owning a passport to visit foreign countries before 2008), she CANNOT claim to have this type of "experience."
Palin was NEVER involved in any foreign trade missions (in fact, she flat out lied when she claimed this type of experience on national television); Palin was NEVER involved in a situation that required her to lead the National Guard or even issue an executive order! Therefore, she can't claim to have work experience in EITHER area. NO track record = NO experience.
Your analogy to the role of the POTUS as commander-in-chief is equally dense. Bush doesn't need to issue an executive order for each tactical maneuver in Iraq and Afghanistan, but he did authorize the invasion in the first place and he continues to authorize major strategic shifts (like the "Surge"). Your "analogy" is just as faulty as the rest of your "logic."
MOTIGUI:
"However, she is briefed from time to time on top secret issues involving the 49th and with that she has a higher security clearance than Obama does up until the time he's sworn in."
So? What has Palin actually DONE with this information? What decision-making situations has Palin had to face as the result of access to this intelligence? What decisions has Palin made as nominal commander of the National Guard? What track record can she point to that actually qualifies as "experience"? There were certainly opportunities (mostly natural disasters) for Palin to be involved in these decision-making situations, as my cited article indicates, but Palin chose not to be involved in it.
As for Obama, he chairs the European Affairs Subcommittee under the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. And Obama, with Biden's approval, chaired 4 meetings at the full Senate Foreign Relations committee level to probe Generals Jones and Petraeus about the ongoing operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. Congressmen are not executives and can't issue executive level decisions, but at least Obama has demonstrated the willingness to tackle foreign policy issues at the level that his position as Congressman legally restricts him to.
By the way, McCain missed ALL 4 of these meetings.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi...
Get it yet, or do you need to ask someone smarter to explain it to you again?
I can't believe someone has to explain what the term "work experience" means to you.
LOL.
Pathetic.-
0%
LegalBob1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
What is truly pathetic is that you two can't agree to disagree. The role of the 49th is the first line of defense in case of a missile launch from the Soviet Union and that, on top of her security clearance and subsequent advisories from the DOD gives her all the experience she needs in time of an attack. So, let me get this straight, you believe she doesn't have any experience because there hasn't been a missile attack yet? Preventative "experience", yes. First hand experience, I surely hope not. What sort of "experience" do you want from her in this matter anyway, push a missile launch button ??? :-)
Reply
Too bad you had to stoop to handle-munging, shows that you are not confident in your approach and have no intentions on carry on a more peaceful discussion and intelligent conversation. I know, it's my job to ascertain that. Too bad this couldn't have resulted in a more intelligent discussion as there is always more than one side of any story.-
100%
ybdogsct1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
LEGALBOB
Reply
"So, let me get this straight, you believe she doesn't have any experience because there hasn't been a missile attack yet?"
*Sigh*
Your perspective is so limited, and it's clear you did NOT read in full the articles I cited.
1) Palin's role as commander of the National Guard is NOT limited to "missile attacks," as you crudely put it. In fact, as short as her tenure as governor has been, there have ALREADY been occasions (mostly natural disasters, civic emergencies, and rescue missions. None of these occasions involved your fantasy "missile strike" scenario.) during which Palin could have stepped up to the plate as true commander of the National Guard, but instead she DECLINED to participate. Instead, Maj. Gen. Craig Campbell took charge.
Yes, Palin is technically the nominal commander of the National Guard, but she has recused herself every time she could have led as commander of the National Guard and therefore has NO record of ACTUAL DECISION-MAKING. Experience means being able to point to a successful track record of decision-making, being able to say that you've been in these situations before, and being able to demonstrate practical knowledge you've learned from these situations. Palin can't claim ANY "experience" since every time a situation arose that required her to act as a commander of the National Guard, she excused herself and allowed others (Maj. Gen. Craig Campbell) to do the work for her.
NO decision making means NO experience. And proximity to Russia alone does NOT qualify as "foreign policy credentials."
2) Palin flat out LIED about conducting trade missions with Russia. There is NO RECORD of her ever conducting trade missions with Russia. In fact, there's NO RECORD of her even owning a passport until 2008.
3) If the U.S. had suddenly come under a Russian "missile attack" via Alaska, Palin would NOT be in command. The POTUS, NORAD, and NATO would assume control of the situation and the National Guard, NOT Sarah Palin (thank goodness!). LOL.
4) "Preventive experience"? LOL. Ok, I'll bite. What decisions did Palin make that would qualify as "preventive experience"? What actions did Palin take as governor to "prevent" the U.S. from a Russian "missile strike"? LOL. This ought to be good. By all means, post away and don't forget to include document evidence from nonpartisan sources to support your claims.
LEGALBOB:
"Too bad you had to stoop to handle-munging, shows that you are not confident in your approach and have no intentions on carry on a more peaceful discussion and intelligent conversation."
You want an "intelligent conversation"? Fine. You can start by supporting your assertions with documented evidence from nonpartisan sources, as I have already done above.
LEGALBOB:
"Too bad this couldn't have resulted in a more intelligent discussion as there is always more than one side of any story."
There is a limit to my patience, and that limit is often exceeded when bloviators dismiss the documented evidence I cite without having the decency to present ANY counter-evidence whatsoever. I cited an article in which the MAJOR GENERAL of the Alaska National Guard HIMSELF, Maj. Gen. Craig Campbell, is on record as stating that Palin has NEVER exercised her nominal authority as governor to lead/orchestrate/authorize the National Guard in ANY operation, including rescue missions, civic emergencies, and even "preventive" maneuvers to counter your imaginary "Russian missile strike" (LOL). Yet, you are willing to dismiss the General's comments out of hand as if you know more about the situation than he does!
LOL!
But by all means, here is your opening. If you're truly interested in a "more intelligence discussion" and if "there's always more than one side of any story," you are certainly free to present your side.
I await your DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE. Don't worry; I won't be holding my breath. -
Neutral
HughGeeRekshun11 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Don't ANY of you friggin dumbasses understand that it's JUST AT TITLE for crying out loud. Palin is "Commander-in-Chief" because it goes along with being THE GOVERNOR. She never exercised those powers simply because there hasn't been ANYthing to cause her to take any sort of action. However, it IS a KNOWN FACT that AS Governor she most definitely is updated on matters of National Security and has a TOP SECRET clearance, again, it goes along with the office of the Governor of THAT state due to the responsibilities of the National Guard in that locale. Nobody that I know of has ever stated that she would "take command" in the time of a crisis. And because of those briefing does in fact give her "preventative experience". Will she ever use it? No, the General will.
Reply
To use a worn out old phrase "GET A LIFE" for crissake.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
33%
CajunChamp1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You don't follow what is being discussed very well, do you. The issue is that Palin said that she can SEE Russia and that gives her foreign policy credentials. She NEVER SAID that whatsoever. That's the issue. She never said that to Couric either. Read her response to Gibson and then read the responses to Couric again and maybe you'll get the hang of it, that is if you can see through your tainted specs. I am no expert in foreign policy but I do understand concepts quite well. I fully understand her comments and not once did I consider her responses to be "I can see Russia, therefore I am an expert in foreign policy". To think that is what she meant is absolutely absurd. But you don't like her, so whatever you think is understandable.
Reply-
100%
ybdogsct1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
CAJUN:
Reply
"You don't follow what is being discussed very well, do you. The issue is that Palin said that she can SEE Russia and that gives her foreign policy credentials. She NEVER SAID that whatsoever."
I believe it's you who doesn't follow the discussion very well. Claiming foreign policy credentials because of Russia's proximity is EQUALLY ABSURD. Palin may have never used the words "see Russia from my house," but she did make the ABSURD argument that Alaska's proximity to Russia was sufficient by itself to give her foreign policy credentials.
You know your argument is a lost cause when you've been reduced to parsing words.
LOL.
CAJUN:
"I fully understand her comments and not once did I consider her responses to be 'I can see Russia, therefore I am an expert in foreign policy.'"
Than I think you better read it again. Her claim that Alaska's proximity to Russia is sufficient to afford her foreign policy experience is there in black-and-white.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nokTjEdaUGg
"COURIC: You've cited Alaska's proximity to Russia as part of your foreign policy experience. What did you mean by that? Explain to me why that enhances your foreign policy credentials.
PALIN: Well, it certainly does BECAUSE OUR-- OUR NEXT DOOR ARE FOREIGN COUNTRIES. They're in the state that I am the executive of. And there in Russia--"
And to make matters worse, Palin claims that conducting trade missions with Russia as governor of Alaska gives her foreign policy credentials, yet records show that she LIED. Palin NEVER conducted any trade missions with Russia and in fact didn't even own a passport until 2008.
-
-
-
-
-
-
100%
bluetexasvalley1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Sorry, but that bit of insight did not come from SNL.
Reply
The first time I heard it reported was during the Republican Convention, right after her speech, and it was said by Fox News' Steve Doocy -- with a straight face. I couldn't believe it.
The next time I heard it repeated was by Cindy McCain during some interview. It was clearly not meant to be funny. This was all well before SNL got into the act.
After that I heard it from McCain, Palin herself and several other Republicans trying to establish her foreign policy "experience".
Perhaps you would like to treat it as a joke now, but at the time it was delivered in all seriousness by the GOP. -
-
86%
Jeboba1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Bogus story? It's been all over TV today. VIDEO TAPES! Nothing bogus about this story, just the bogus bimbo at the center of it.
Reply
She is totally clueless. What a loser! SHE lost the election for you guys and you still defend her?
NO, SNL did not make up "seeing russia". Sarah said we can see Russian from Alaska. SNL just spiced it up a bit by adding 'from my house' At any rate, the woman is just so stupid it is funny to us with a brain cell to work with. -
90%
Jeboba1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
C'mon! You can't even figure out why we are talking about her! It's not that she was at a turkey farm, it's that she was too stupid to move to a different spot when the actual slaughtering of the birds was going on behind her. It was in very bad taste to most people.
Reply
The whole bruhaha is that she is just STUPID... just like YOU idiots that support her. Why don't you go consult your witch doctor at your church!! -
-
-
-
28%
Endoscopy1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
What a bunch of morons. Where do you think that the turkeys you are going to eat in a few days comes from. Where do you think that any meat you eat comes from. Those of us who grew up in agribusiness get used to seeing these kinds of things. Go and visit a slaughter house sometime. The ranting about anything to do with the killing of turkeys is nonsense unless you are a vegetarian.
Reply-
75%
Radiofreeeuropa1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
That’s pretty darned Palin youbetcha of you.
Reply
I guess this is the new GOP strategy, show various deaths and slaughters while their politicians are bloviating...hoping to distract the eye from the warmongering and economy wrecking. It could work!-
25%
Endoscopy1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Those things are a fact of life and if you do not like the thought of it become a vegetarian. Working on the farm I had to kill chicken and the women then took the dead birds and scalded them in hot water and pulled the feathers off. It is not fun but if we wanted to eat chicken that is what we had to do. I also helped slaughter a cow once. You people that never have to get your hand dirty doing these things and then rant about it should be forced to kill and butcher your own food for a while. It becomes do it or starve.
Reply
Go take your foolishness somewhere else. You are sickening to those of us who have had to do this kind of thing.-
100%
Radiofreeeuropa1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Wow no matter how many times you are corrected you insist on this being about "anti turkey farming". Somehow I don't believe you are that dense, your just being obtuse.
Reply
It's the "wisdom" of doing an interview with that in the background. Not whether or not turkeys are slaughtered or how. But you are being disingenuous, you KNOW full well. Not even Palin is that dense.
-
-
-
29%
Georgia501 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I guess they thought turkey meat was a soybean by-product. Which is completely reasonable considering, for example, that Neil Boortz can't get a caller to his radio show who both a) voted for Obama and b) knows who Nancy Pelosi is.
Reply
Sure hope they don't channel surf to National Geographic while a lion is closing in on a wildebeast. They'll be reduced to mindless zom... Oh wait. They're already there.-
100%
alakazam1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You ever see a chicken with it's head cut off, Georgia?
Reply
It's a less than pretty sight.
Why don't you send us all a film with that in the background?
Show us how classy you think it is.
It's pretty 'frikken warped that it's an issue...but she could have turned around so we did not have to watch the Ring O' Death.-
33%
Endoscopy1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
No it is not fun. But it has to be done. Why did Radiofreeeuropa put this on Propeller? So you and everybody else that hates Palin can rant some more. Where she is from most people are used to this kind of thing and think nothing of it. That was a local reporter and Radiofreeeuropa made it into Propeller insanity.
Reply-
100%
Radiofreeeuropa1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
How about that! It was on every network within 24 hrs...even FOX.
Reply
Looks like your buddy RFE has a nose for news.
And a disdain for warmongering troglodytes.Youbetcha wink wink.
Again no one is against turkey farms, you are missing the point.
It's the idea that a candidate for national office who doesn't understand that having animals slaughtered in the background of an interview would be viewed as offensive to most reasonable people. If this is the future of the GOP, you can be sure to continue shrinking into irrelevancy. -
100%
alakazam1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I do not hate Palin.
Reply
I just think she is one of the last people on the face of all the Earth I would chose as President of the United States.
The very idea is ridiculous.
The video is more like a mad theatrical play than a news interview.
Death of a Turkey ?
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
82%
Radiofreeeuropa1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Your joking right? Would Ronald Reagan have had animals being slaughtered 3 ft away from him in an interview? Would anyone with a brain? You wouldn't defend Obama if he was bizarre enough to use slaughtering animals as a background for an interview. It's just moronic and in very poor decorum.
Reply-
28%
lovemylibs1 year ago
-
-
-
-
100%
cushi1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
It reminded me of the great turkey tragedy on the defunct tv series, WKRP in Cincinnati. Remember when they tried to do a turkey giveaway by dropping the turkeys out of a plane? And the poor turkeys were dropping on people or hitting the ground, like, SPLATTT!!
Reply
The poor reporter was going, "Oh, the humanity!" It was hilarious...because it was a tv show and a comedy and meant to be in ridiculous bad taste...but seeing the real deal? HEARTLESS, HUMORLESS AND HIDEOUS!! -
-
-
-
40%
CajunChamp1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I can't find the link pointing to where she said she was fine with it. Please post, thanks. If she was "fine with it", so what? The ultimate villain here is the station that allowed it to be aired. Now, maybe a stretch but not too far off ... what IF that run should have hit the cutting room floor and some tech out for a buk or two, sold it rather than burning it? It HAS happened ya know and quite often.
Reply -
-
-
88%
Jeboba1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
OH, now we are going to blame the camera man? Hmmm? Of course, Republicans NEVER accept any responsibility for their actions and ALWAYS blame somebody else.
Reply
Look, the woman is a stupid bimbo. Let's hope she keeps it up. It won't take long for the people of Alaska to get sick and tired of being laughed at. She will NEVER be re-elected, even to dog catcher of Wasilla.
I'm sure the RNC wishes she would go away too! She has embarassed the hell out of them. Except there are the right wing radical evangelical fundamentalist gon totin fruitcakes that like her! Well, that leave most reasonable people out and WE DON'T LIKE HER because she gives the rest of the world the excuse to laugh at all of us! -
BlueAutumn_1989Comment removed: Retracted by user
-
-
78%
lvrofwolves1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
RFE-Yah I know! and this is something I want to make sure to think about as I'm sitting down at the table this Thanksgiving, Sarah Palins shrill voice and turkey blood.......
Reply
That was poor decorum. I could see that as a SNL skit, it would be funny, but somehow this was disturbing.-
88%
lvrofwolves1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
That guy reminds me of the movie Fargo, where he's mindlessly stuffing a body in a wood chipper. There's Sarah standing there in her expensive clothes all chipper, and giddy saying nothing of importance except that she was glad to be there, involved, and she didn't care about any political backlash, by golly she was having a good time!!!
Reply
No class....
-
-
-
-
-
75%
DarkWizard1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Thank you for the invite and the funny video! Is she just totally clueless or what?!
Reply
Seeing turkeys get killed didn't faze me one bit as I've heard my Dad's vivid description of killing chickens on the farm many times. Of course, it wasn't surprising to see Palin use this event for more inane babbling (any setting works for that!).
The predictable clamor from the right-wing rabble is what I find even more hilarious! Defending Palin has no meaning except to show that birds (turkeys) of a feather…vote for morons (or something like that).
The defeat of McCain/Palin has been harsh on the Neocon faithful and some of the staunch Republicans. But, at least articles like this one still give them a way to keep their writing skills sharp, their wit keen and their comments as ready as waiting for that next chance to grab a vine while sinking in quicksand.
I actually envy the Neocons! They are so hapless, blind and ignorant that they don’t even know that they lost the election for President and some major seats in Congress. Ignorance is bliss! Of course, the ones that do realize they’ve lost are waiting for a recount and another Supreme Court decision! Happy Turkey Day!
-
loading ...
Ciera-Marie
Eagle_Eye
DarkWizard
cushi
Charlson
jordan11
Poulenc
ETproductions
tchef
alakazam
mntnman444
JenMurdock
fsev41
Goppy
Will1313
Beeboppin71
lvrofwolves
puffin
onlyonesecret
DenCuddy
Progressive
Sageparadox
socialexpert
9critters
TFL
normallysilent
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.