« Back to story "Ban on cluster bomb production due to pass into international humanitarian law, despite absence of US, Russia signatures"

Story Comments

Posted by: memestryker 1 year ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Neutral
memestryker1 year ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

The U.K. and Congo, for starters. The U.S. actually issued guns to the U.K. at one point because they had disarmed themselves.

Many women were so viciously raped in African countries (that had disarmed at the suggestion of the U.N.) that they even require plastic bags to urinate and defacate since the attacks. Up to 90% of women in some villages have been brutally raped because the villagers have no means of defense since they were disarmed. The U.N. actually declared rape an act of war as a result so perpetrators could be charged with war crimes.

The media has reported that the elderly are sitting ducks for home invaders in the U.K. and Australia now that the bad guys know they won't be armed.

Try sitting on hold on a 911 call in the U.S.--some people choose to be disarmed even when they don't have to be, to their demise.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
3 Replies

loading ...
- Neutral
  dissent1 year ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  firstly, you should provide sources when asked for evidence not more opinions to support your opinion. secondly, these opinions don't exactly cover the sweep of the broadbrush stroke made by your initial opinion
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  2 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - Neutral
    memestryker1 year ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    I've already provided sources for these on other discussions (some several times), and decided not to bother to include them again here. They are easily found through propeller search or google if you really are interested.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    1 Reply
    
    loading ...
    - Neutral
      dissent1 year ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      i'll be sure to catalog and file all your comments on all threads in future so that i don't make the same mistake again :|
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      0 Replies
      
      loading ...