Story Comments
Posted by: engineer 12 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
81%
engineer12 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Sounds like the GOP Neocons. They are the lowest ruthless nonhumans to be in any sort of power. They don't care about anything but their neocon agenda right or wrong. They call themselves Christian conservatives. JC is turning over in his grave since he was a liberal
Reply-
22%
hyperbola12 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Well, some of your sentiments are certainly correct, but you forgot to mention that a major proportion of the "neocons" are in fact ZionCons. Many jews are also turning over in their graves about the pseudo-jewish zioncons. Many of the others are simply "careerists" of the kind that Hannah Arendt identified.
Reply
Both christians and jews should root these abominations out of their communities.
The American Council of Judaism
Explaining the Long — and Largely Untold — History of Jewish Opposition to Zionism
A THREAT FROM WITHIN: A CENTURY OF JEWISH OPPOSITION TO ZIONISM,
by Yakov M. Rabkin,
While many in Israel and in Jewish communities in the U.S. and other countries now promote the idea that Zionism and Judaism are, in effect, the same and that opposition to Zionism constitutes “anti-Semitism,” the historical fact — largely untold — is that, for most of its history, Zionism has been a decidedly minority movement among Jews throughout the world.
Since its inception as a political movement in 1897, both Reform and Orthodox Jews rejected Zionism’s basic premise of creating a Jewish state in Palestine and having Jews either emigrate to it or, at the very least, consider it “central” to their Jewish identity.
An overwhelming majority of Orthodox Jews, unwilling to accept the restoration of a Jewish state in Palestine by means other than divine intervention, considered Zionism a false messianic movement. Most Jewish liberals and socialists, having accepted the faith of the Enlightenment, with its emphasis on optimism, reason and progress, rejected Zionism as a reactionary philosophy. ....
... In the forward, Joseph Agassi, professor of Philosophy at Tel Aviv University, notes that, “The author raises questions about the myth that Israel protects the Jews around the world and constitutes their natural homeland. This book rightly shows that this myth is anti-Jewish. ...
... Zionism gained support in areas where social and political conditions were unfavorable to Jews, particularly the Russian Empire. Indeed, Rabkin argues that Zionism has far more in common with the emerging nationalisms which swept Europe in the late 19th and early 20th centuries than anything to be found in Jewish tradition. ...
... This instrumentalization of religion, writes Israeli historian and political scientist Zeev Sternhell, is not specific to Zionism but can be found in many varieties of organic nationalism propagated in Europe from the mid-l9th century onward. Rabkin declares that, “While keeping intact the social function of religion in order to unify the people, Zionism eliminated its metaphysical content. In the same way religion became a vital element of many varieties of nationalism; for example, neither the Polish variant nor 1’Action Francaise made any efforts to disguise their Catholic traits, Sternhell defines this trend as ‘religion without God,’ religion that has preserved only its outward symbols.” ...-
-
-
-
93%
ETproductions12 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I gave Hyperbola a neg. on the comments not because they were either true or false, but becausae they were so far off topic for the article in question. S/he should post articles illuminating the split between extreme Zionist conservatives and the voice of reason. I'd be happy to learn from and participate in that debate in its proper place.
Reply
-
-
-
-
15%
mivan412 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Jesus is no longer in the grave, and you reap what you sow- Liberals were blaming Bush for the market crash that started before he was elected and continued to do so after he was elected but not yet in office. They also blamed him for 911 which was just barley after he took office. Quit whining already if you can't stand the heat ......... Also Jesus taught more Conservative principals than Liberal ones. He DID NOT CONDONE SIN but loved the sinner anyway! There is no way he would have condoned abortion or gay lifestyles !
Reply-
92%
jakesguile12 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Depends Mivan, he'd have loved the person who had to have the abortion, realizing that it scarred them psychologically for life and that would be their punishment. As for gay lifestlyes, I'm PRETTY sure as long as it's not hurting anybody (a point I won't argue with you, because you OBVIOUSLY contend gays are harmful to life, I disagree vehemently) that Jesus wouldn't care and would go so far as to be the one to ordain the ceremony.
Reply
But again this is just my opinion, far be it from ME, a mere MORTAL MAN to interpret the will of a God, and shame on the people who think they have it downpat.-
80%
oneironaut42012 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"he'd have loved the person who had to have the abortion, realizing that it scarred them psychologically for life and that would be their punishment."
Reply
LOL...I've known three women who had abortions when they were young, and not a single one is "psychologically scarred for life". Typical anti-choice propaganda. 8(-
-
Neutral
jakesguile12 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Actually oneironaut I was meeting the fools 50/50, I'm pro-choice all the way, I just distain people who take the words of God interpreted by man and interpret them farther then claim they're still "from God." I'm Christian but not a zionist (I'm gay so obviously not). Annoys me heh
Reply
-
-
-
SwampFox-82ndComment removed: Retracted by user2 Replies
-
90%
djn3nunez312 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
They also blamed him for 911 which was just barley after he took office.
Reply
That's a bit of revisionist history. Fact is he was in office nearly 8 full months. He ignored the advice of experts as well as the exiting Clinton Administrations, and was pursuing the missile defense as the only way to protect America. He even ignore the PDB titled "Bin Laden determined to attack inside the U.S". Furthermore his administration tried to negociate a deal for a gas pipeline with the Taliban during the first 8 months of his administration. But still I don't blame him for the attacks, that fall directly on al Queda and the Taliban. However I don't think President Bush did enough to protect America from such threats and perhaps members of his administration simply didn't want too. They wanted a "New Pearl Harbor" to justify an invasion in the ME. -
-
-
-
86%
Goppy12 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I think the Republican Party needs more people like this Propellerite ... one of my fans ...
Reply
http://www.propeller.com/member/bikertrsh/comments...
This is the base the GOP needs to build upon to enhance their stance as the Modern Morally Vacant Party.-
TFLComment removed: Hard Banned
-
-
-
14%
Endoscopy12 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
ROTFLMAO
Reply
You did it to Bush and now you are complaining that it might be done to Obama. I love it.
What is the problem with doing to him what you people did to Bush. I can't wait for him to be inaugurated. Then the fun will begin. LOL-
TFLComment removed: Hard Banned
-
100%
ybdogsct12 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
ENDOSCOPY:
Reply
"What is the problem with doing to him what you people did to Bush. I can't wait for him to be inaugurated. Then the fun will begin."
That's PRECISELY the point, ENDOSCOPY. You, PC25, and the rest of your ilk haven't even waited until Obama has assumed office yet and you're ALREADY trying to scapegoat him.
The tactic is as transparent as it is pathetic.
LOL.-
Neutral
Endoscopy12 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The fun is just starting. Just wait until he is inaugurated. Then we can really get going. Like Truman had on his desk. "The buck stops here".
Reply
Well everything will be his fault at that point. Poor libs will have to defend instead of attack. You will have a different problem in what you write. Anything that is the least little trouble will be yours to defend. Have fun. I am.
Trying to blame it on Bush will not work because you kept saying everything was Bushes fault even when things went back to Clinton. So don't even try the argument that it is because of Bush. -
-
-
-
loading ...
Ciera-Marie
DarkWizard
rumple4skin
cushi
vor
Justice4All
jordan11
ETproductions
Pupi
tchef
gamahuche
mntnman444
fsev41
juvel
Goppy
Will1313
splitrch
mesodude
ProudBlueTexan
DenCuddy
bushiesRbonkers
Progressive
Sageparadox
TFL
iamamaniac
jumpmaster
Albmore
normallysilent
DaneL
automan909
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.