Story Comments
Posted by: mivan4 1 year ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
15%
mivan41 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Jesus is no longer in the grave, and you reap what you sow- Liberals were blaming Bush for the market crash that started before he was elected and continued to do so after he was elected but not yet in office. They also blamed him for 911 which was just barley after he took office. Quit whining already if you can't stand the heat ......... Also Jesus taught more Conservative principals than Liberal ones. He DID NOT CONDONE SIN but loved the sinner anyway! There is no way he would have condoned abortion or gay lifestyles !
Reply-
92%
jakesguile1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Depends Mivan, he'd have loved the person who had to have the abortion, realizing that it scarred them psychologically for life and that would be their punishment. As for gay lifestlyes, I'm PRETTY sure as long as it's not hurting anybody (a point I won't argue with you, because you OBVIOUSLY contend gays are harmful to life, I disagree vehemently) that Jesus wouldn't care and would go so far as to be the one to ordain the ceremony.
Reply
But again this is just my opinion, far be it from ME, a mere MORTAL MAN to interpret the will of a God, and shame on the people who think they have it downpat.-
80%
oneironaut4201 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"he'd have loved the person who had to have the abortion, realizing that it scarred them psychologically for life and that would be their punishment."
Reply
LOL...I've known three women who had abortions when they were young, and not a single one is "psychologically scarred for life". Typical anti-choice propaganda. 8(-
-
Neutral
jakesguile1 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Actually oneironaut I was meeting the fools 50/50, I'm pro-choice all the way, I just distain people who take the words of God interpreted by man and interpret them farther then claim they're still "from God." I'm Christian but not a zionist (I'm gay so obviously not). Annoys me heh
Reply
-
-
-
SwampFox-82ndComment removed: Retracted by user2 Replies
-
90%
djn3nunez31 year ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
They also blamed him for 911 which was just barley after he took office.
Reply
That's a bit of revisionist history. Fact is he was in office nearly 8 full months. He ignored the advice of experts as well as the exiting Clinton Administrations, and was pursuing the missile defense as the only way to protect America. He even ignore the PDB titled "Bin Laden determined to attack inside the U.S". Furthermore his administration tried to negociate a deal for a gas pipeline with the Taliban during the first 8 months of his administration. But still I don't blame him for the attacks, that fall directly on al Queda and the Taliban. However I don't think President Bush did enough to protect America from such threats and perhaps members of his administration simply didn't want too. They wanted a "New Pearl Harbor" to justify an invasion in the ME. -
-
loading ...
ningyo
Patience
BBcamaro
automan909
cushi
vor
saneman
jordan11
ETproductions
gamahuche
oneironaut420
ForrestPhelps
doppich
BillieMaxer
juvel
ProudBlueTexan
GWHayduke
DenCuddy
bushiesRbonkers
Progressive
Sageparadox
JEBUS08
TFL
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.