« Back to story "Capitalism’s worst crisis since the 1930s"

Story Comments

Posted by: Radiofreeeuropa 1 year ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 88%
    Radiofreeeuropa1 year ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    FTA- "Capitalism’s only way out of the crisis is by lowering labor costs (wage-cutting) and the massive devaluation of capital, as businesses are destroyed and surviving capitalists swallow up the weaker businesses on the cheap."

    Remarkably this is exactly what the financial sector recipients did with over a trillion dollars pumped their way. Allegedly this was to prevent them from making credit scarce, they were supposed to loan the money out. Did they? NO.
    What did they do with the bailout money? Mostly they did exactly what this article accuses them of doing- Bought up smaller companies on the cheap. Then they rewarded their management with perks and bonuses.

    It is insulting that the cretins whose greed and awful judgment brought down these companies to begin with, are rewarded for their gross incompetence courtesy of taxpayers. Believing letting these guys will behave honorably in a market with no rules or oversight (remember that's what happened in '29. How this failed approach could be repacked and resold again always confused me. Could people really be this stupid?) is like believing a bunch of toddlers left on their own in a candy star won't eat all the candy, wreck the store, then get a bellyache and throw up on your shoes.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    15 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      berkeley1 year ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      and no "major" figure in either party has anything different to offer. the waterfall is now quite close, we just don't know how far the fall will be.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 11%
        Endoscopy1 year ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        What a bunch of malarkey. The problem is similar to the 2000 - 2001 recession. We are nowhere near a depression. But the left wing just loves gloom and doom even when they cause it and blame it on someone else. Well in a couple of years this will be the Obama recession and we conservatives then call it the Obama depression since he did not immediately fix it. We will have fun with that. It's all Obama's fault. He trained ACORN represented them against Citicorp to try and ford them to make more bad loans. When Fannie and Freddy refused to take loans without a minimum of 10% down they went and lobbied congress and in 1992 their dream came true and CRA and other banking laws were modified. Taking effect in 1995. Housing boom with all the new possible home owners. No down, low starting ARM, no principle for a few years, etc. Uproar in congress because Republicans wanted to fix Fannie and Freddy. Housing bubble bust in 2006. mortgaged property dropped over 30%. Papers issued for the mortgages were suddenly worth that much less. Oops the money disappeared out of the financial market.

        All Obama's fault. He trained and helped ACORN. Just look at the resulting financial mess. Thank you Obama. Shall we keep up the list of Obama's failures and how he is ruining the country? This is going to be fun.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        11 Replies

        loading loading ...
        • 91%
          ConsAreNonGrata1 year ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          There was no recession in 2000-2001, Cons, Check the numbers.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply

          3 Replies

          loading loading ...
          • 0%
            Endoscopy1 year ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            You check the numbers. People laid off and market down. My 401K lost 1/6 value each of those years. I remember that quite well. The liberals were blaming Bush but it started the last year of Clinton. Can't remember blaming that all on Bush can you. Poor libs. Can't keep their story straight.

            Here is a link to a story about the NASDAQ from 2000 to 2003. LOL

            http://www.lowrisk.com/nasdaq-1929.htm

            They compare it to the crash of 1929. Just like you yoyos are now.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply

            2 Replies

            loading loading ...
            • 100%
              Radiofreeeuropa1 year ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              Look up what a recession is.
              a recession is defined as two consecutive quarters of decline in real gross domestic product. The Internet bubble did not have a large effect on real domestic product.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              • 100%
                Beau78901 year ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                If your investments lost 16% in each of two years, that was nothing like what we're now seeing. The markets are down over 40% in nine months across the board. And some have lost over half.

                You're in denial about the current situation. And if you're going to tell me you're doing better than the market averages, congratulations. But that doesn't mean our current situation is the same as it was at the beginning of Bush's term.

                By the way, we'd all appreciate it if you'd look at some real information and realize that the subprime mortgage debacle is just a tiny portion of our economic crisis. Our entire economy depends on lending of all kinds, and no one's doing it. We haven't seen the fed drop rates to 0.3% to try to encourage lending in many decades, and it still isn't working. And the basic cause of all of the markets plunging was complete deregulation, allowing idiots running banks and hedge funds who don't know what they're buying to lap up all the bad financial instruments (not simply bundled subprimes) on borrowed money, with less to back their risks. All ACORN did was try to allow poor people to own homes rather than rent. The mortgages those people took were already prevalent in the market.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply
                loading loading ...
            • 93%
              Radiofreeeuropa1 year ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              Sounds like an alternate universe your posting from. One in which simplistic one dimensional myopic opinion prevails with a complete and utter denial of factuality.
              Set your phasor on stun, and check in with Capt. Kirk.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply

              6 Replies

              loading loading ...
              • 14%
                Endoscopy1 year ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                Read my link above and weep. Poor lib can't use Google to fine out the facts. Remember the .com bust?

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply

                5 Replies

                loading loading ...
                • 100%
                  Radiofreeeuropa1 year ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  Like all bubbles- caused by greedy speculators.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                  Reply

                  4 Replies

                  loading loading ...
                  • 100%
                    Beau78901 year ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    Greedy speculators accountable to no one.

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                    Reply

                    3 Replies

                    loading loading ...
                    • 0%
                      beavith11 year ago

                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                      greedy speculators? wow. let's pass a law legislating morality. then we can pass another one legislating human nature.

                      sheesh.

                      say. how're those speculators doing now? especially the bastids that bid the price of gas up to 4 and 5$ a gallon?

                      markets correct. most of the time you don't even know it.

                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                      Reply

                      2 Replies

                      loading loading ...
                      • 100%
                        Beau78901 year ago

                        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                        All we have to do is pass laws to prevent consumers and little guys trying to invest, who do not have the backing of teams of lawyers, from being swindled. And especially, to enforce them. In my book, that's a far cry from legislating morality.

                        Again, deregulation allowed bad investment instruments and their resulting bubbles to be created. (Remember junk bonds? Did anyone learn?) That'd be fine if only the buyers of those instruments suffered. But because our economy is dependent on lending, everyone ends up paying, especially the poor.

                        I'd guess that while some of those who bid the price of oil up took a beating, most got out with hefty profits--and sold high to those aforementioned little guys.

                        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                        Reply
                        loading loading ...
                        • 100%
                          Radiofreeeuropa1 year ago

                          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                          "how're those speculators doing now?"
                          They are passing their gambling debts on to you and me.
                          They are doing just fine.
                          That, it seems, is a big part of the problem.
                          "Free market! Free Market!!"
                          ...until the grotesque greed catches up then it's
                          "Government save my a$$, Government save my a$$".
                          It's no more advisable to let the wall street thugs loose on the market with no supervision than to let a gang of toddlers loose in the candy store with no supervision.

                          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                          Reply
                          loading loading ...
              • 100%
                mark-stevens1 year ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                It's all a matter of opinion... Everett, Washington, the real home for Boeing, at that time a poulation of 47,000 was hit hard in the 70's when the Boeing plant of 20,000 plus, all but closed.

                It seemed that one of every three houses were for sale. I had a guy offer a split level on a lake with a "take over payments" offer.
                He found no takers, and lost the house through the bank.

                Everett survived and so will America

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply

                1 Reply

                loading loading ...

            Post Reply

            You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

            People Who Liked This Comment (15)

            People Who Didn't Like This Comment (2)

            Submit a Story

            Advertisement

            Story Tags ?

            failure theory politics economy decline

            Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

            Real Estate Info

            Get the Latest Market Info for Your Area



            Foreclosures | Short Sale

            Luxury Homes | Homes for Sale

            First Time Home Buyer Advice



            Dropping This Article

            No one has dropped this story.

            Also Submitted By

            No one else has submitted this story.