« Back to story "Soldier alleges military pattern of Christian bias"

Story Comments

Posted by: KISA452a 11 months, 1 week ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • Neutral
    KISA452a11 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It ยป

    "The government is supposed to be totally non-discriminatory when it comes to religion and religious preference."

    This includes being totally non-discriminatory AGAINST religion. It is hard to implement, I agree. As we keep hearing, Atheists want protection using first amendment grounds of freedom of religion. At the same time, they claim not to be a religion in which case this does not apply to them. If they get protection they are a religion and others deserve the same protections. If the government is "non-religious", that would be Atheist. Enforcing atheism is enforcing this brand of religion or is against religion and religious practices.

    People should not be forced to pray if they do not chose to. They can be forced to be polite and observe a moment of silence to let those who wish to pray to do so. That is a reasonable compromise to my mind.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    loading loading ...

    Post Reply

    You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

    People Who Liked This Comment (0)

    No one voted this comment positively. Is it really that bad of a comment?

    People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)

    No one voted this comment negatively.