Atheists have moral reflections too »
Posted By idyll 10 months, 2 weeks ago in ReligionI've always enjoyed Thought for the Day (TFTD), that two-minute spot in the middle of Radio 4 's Today programme , which seems to be a brief respite from the hard news, and a chance for someone to give moral or ethical reflections on current events. The trouble is that only religious speakers are invited. Rabbis, priests, imams, chaplains, and monks are there, but never humanists, agnostics, or atheists.
Read Full Story at guardian.co.uk »
741 Views Share Story 46 Comments Report
Submitted By:
idyll
"You can swim all day in the Sea of Knowledge and never get wet." - The Phantom Tollbooth
I host the Prop Lit group. Please look ...
Other Related Articles:
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentComments So Far: 46 (view all)
-
100%
oneironaut42010 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The article is pretty good, but what I found most interesting were the comments below the article. Almost immediately I could tell I wasn't reading comments posted by Americans, as there was a serious lack of Locky-like smugness. By that, I mean nobody was wielding their belief like a weapon and posting antagonistic platitudes like, "God believes in you whether you believe in him or not" or "I'll pray that God turns you away from atheism". It was refreshing to see relatively rational, calm discourse over such a "hot" topic as religion...something the religious fundamentalists here make impossible. 8(
Reply-
-
100%
cloud1510 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
There are plenty of smug religious people but there are also plenty of smug atheists. I have no problem with someone expressing their belief or non-belief in a higher power. But when people start telling other people that their beliefs are childish and nothing but fairy tales I find that insulting, and most of the time it happens with a smug tone behind it.
Reply
-
-
60%
Dionys10 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"The trouble is that only religious speakers are invited. Rabbis, priests, imams, chaplains, and monks are there, but never humanists, agnostics, or atheists."
Reply
Maybe because there's no solid model or common frame of ethics or morality among atheists.
If atheists want in on religious commentary, then they have to once and for all admit that they're a religion based on the pure faith that they alone know the ultimate truth of the universe and that everyone else is wrong, has been wrong for millennia and will continue to be wrong.-
100%
Tangent00110 months, 2 weeks ago
-
100%
ForrestPhelps10 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
To Dionys:
Reply
If I may paraphrase your last paragraph:
"If [insert your religion here] want in on [this] commentary, then they have to once and for all admit that they're a religion based on the pure faith that they alone know the ultimate truth of the universe and that everyone else is wrong, has been wrong for millennia and will continue to be wrong."
So, if we use your own standards, the end result will be that no one talks, since once any religion falls back on the "you must believe" logic, that ends the discussion.
-
-
FrauBlucherComment removed: Retracted by user10 Replies
-
-
-
100%
Charlson10 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I've argued for years that atheists are just as moral or evil as anyone who follows a religion. And the religious who excludes and condemns atheists aren't avery moral at all. Morals are defined as: "of or concerned with judgement principles of right and wrong in relation to human action and character." And no where in the entire definition was there a reference to religion being a prerequisite to morality.
Reply -
100%
moxxxxxxxxxx10 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The non believers tend to intellectualize by using man-made theories to contradict religion and faith beliefs. Memestryker shows us a perfect example of sociological theory describing religion as a cultural phenomenon. I don't know any intellectuals, who claim to be un-religious, who were not influenced (mostly negatively) by some form of religion. The problem is that the majority of people do not mature to a high level of moral development. A level of high moral development indicates a thorough understanding of the relationship between science and the unknown- and a respect for the role religion has played in creating the good in all societies. Simply arguing against it because it cannot be founded on scientific principles is more about a personal inability to tolerate ambiquity and the unknown.
Reply
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.