Story Comments
Posted by: Dionys 10 months, 4 weeks ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-

Dionys10 months, 4 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
No. I'm just saying that if Atheists want in on a program that is specifically for moral and ethical reflections from (as tradition for this program has it) a religious tradition or religious speaker then they have to admit that they're a religion.
Reply
Otherwise they should push for their own 2 minutes of atheist morality/ethics reflection.
Which would be great. Any program that gets people to stop and reflect instead of giving knee-jerk reactions, whether from a theist or atheist stance, is great.-

Tangent00110 months, 4 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I think what the author is saying is the segment is called "Thought for the Day", not "Religious Thought for the Day". By excluding secular philosophy, there is a tacit assumption that the only 'worthy' thoughts regarding morality and ethics come from religion.
Reply-

Dionys10 months, 4 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Well I often see web sites, tv programs or magazines/books that offer a Recipie of the Day, all of which come from one particular branch of cullinary / cultural tastes. I don't see the Hungarian dessert makers throwing fits over the exact number of French desserts being published under the "Dessert recipie of the day."
Reply
:)
-
-

ForrestPhelps10 months, 4 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
From what I understand of the situation, something like TFTD has been part of the BBC since the late 1930's.
Reply
Hmmmm . . . wonder if the original speakers were all CofE, or at least Christian?
At what point did a Rabbi get invited? A Buddhist, a Muslim, etc.
So you see, I'd bet the TFTD has opened its perspective.
Wouldn't it be nice to open it a bit more and allow anyone to comment? Do religious-minded individuals really believe an agnostic/atheist has nothing to contribute to a discussion of morality?
Two solutions as I see it. Rename it Religious Thought for the Day (and allow a like amount of time for the non-religious).
Or just be inclusive.
You know, like what that Jesus guy spoke of.
Anyhow, thanks for the thoughtful response. -
-
-

lvrofwolves10 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
No religion owns morals or ethics. Any person on Earth regardless of faith/belief, can be moral and ethical.
Reply
I'm sure everyone knows amoral and unethical religious people as well as non religious people, and vis versa.
If Atheism was a religion, should they or could they get tax exempts ? for what? a little get together for worship of, preaching about, etc...what exactly??? their non belief in any God(s)?
I don't believe Atheism is a religion and I know 100% there are plenty of very moral and ethical Atheists, some acting much much more 'Christ like' then some Christians do.
-
People Who Liked This Comment (2)
People Who Didn't Like This Comment (1)
Submit a Story
Advertisement

loading ...
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.