« Back to story "Green Bible Stirs Evangelical Concerns"

Story Comments

Posted by: Dionys 11 months, 3 weeks ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 83%
    Dionys11 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    ""• A 2006 survey by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life found that 70 percent of evangelicals believe there is solid evidence that the Earth is getting warmer."

    Doesn't this statistic indicate that you might be painting Christian Conservatives with too broad a brush?"

    Ten dollars, howver, says that (contrary to all the scientific evidence) almost all of that 70 percent believes it to be a part of the natural cycle rather than anthropogenic.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    3 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 60%
      lovemylibs11 months, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      You would have to define your "almost all" qualifier for me to take that bet. I'll bet it's considerably less (my qualifier) than you think. Want to bet on that?

      Now, here's a safe bet. The guy who wrote this article that was on The Huffington Post, is not a Christian Conservative. I'll offer you 10 to 1 odds and I'd like to make the wager for $1,000. Are you game, Dionys? Here's the article:

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/harold-ambler/mr-gor...

      You see, Dionys, it's evident that this should not be a political issue. There are many Democrats and Independents that don't believe in man-made global warming just as there are many Republicans that do believe in it.

      I do many things to limit the carbon output that my activities produce. I try to be a responsible dweller on planet earth. But I would like to see less politicization of this issue. That, in my opinion, is the main problem that "almost all" of my fellow Republicans have with the issue.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      2 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        Dionys11 months, 3 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        "You would have to define your "almost all" qualifier for me to take that bet. I'll bet it's considerably less (my qualifier) than you think. Want to bet on that?

        Sure.

        My almost all equals 87.5% or better of all peer-reviewed science published in peer-reviewed science journals.

        "I do many things to limit the carbon output that my activities produce. I try to be a responsible dweller on planet earth. But I would like to see less politicization of this issue."

        That's great. I agree in that there should be less politicization of the issues of global warming, carbon emissions, pollution, et cetera. As long as something actually gets done other than giving corporations a free pass.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
        • 50%
          lovemylibs11 months, 3 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          You're switching your references, now. Your "almost all" originally was in reference to how many of the 70% believed natural versus man-made causes.

          Your new "almost all" references 87.5% of scientists of peer reviewed science journals.

          How can one make a bet with you if you keep changing the parameters of the bet?

          I'm glad that you agree there should be less politicization of this issue. I am willing to support holding corporations accountable as long as that goofy carbon offset idea isn't used. It's a politically silly tactic.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply
          loading loading ...

    Post Reply

    You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

    People Who Liked This Comment (5)

    People Who Didn't Like This Comment (1)

    Submit a Story

    Advertisement

    Dropping This Article

    view all »

    Groups Watching This

    No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

    Also Submitted By

    No one else has submitted this story.