Story Comments

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

Hamas shoots rockets, while Israel occupies with tanks and f-15's... whose the f**** terrorist you cockamimmy twit deedler.

0 Replies

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

The zionists in Israel have been running a terror campaign against christians and moslems for a full century now. Christians have suffered even more than moslems. For example, Jerusalem had a christian majority until the zionists ethnic cleansed 47% of them in 1948. This is why christians have always been at the forefront of Palestinian resistance to the zionists (although this iws never mentioned in our censored corporate media).

We should stop listening to the zionist propaganda, and begin listening to real jews.

Why Israeli Anti-Zionists do not recognize the right of the State of Israel to exist as a Jewish state

In recent times, the demand has been raised, by representatives of the State of Israel, and by its supporters abroad, to recognize the State of Israel’s “right to exist as a Jewish state”. I am told that this demand is a debater's trick that was invented by Henry Kissinger several years ago. Be that as it may, what, if anything, is wrong with this demand?

If the goal is a negotiated peace agreement, or treaty, there is no need for recognition of “the right of the State of Israel to exist as a Jewish state”. If the goal is to sabotage the possibility of a negotiated agreement, this demand has been placed front and center. A couple of other examples, just to illustrate the preposterous nature of the demand: Has anyone ever asked the Catholics of Ireland to recognize the right of Ulster, or Northern Ireland, to exist as a “Protestant state”? Would we recognize the right of any state to exist as a “Hindu state”? As a “Muslim state”? Just to pose the question is to expose its nature.

But, maybe we are not talking about “Jewish state” as a state affiliated to the Jewish religion. Maybe we are talking about a state that is defined by the dominant ethnicity. In that case, the position does not get any better.

...we have had our fill of states whose raison d'etre is to preserve ethnic superiority and domination. One does not have to refer to the late unlamented “Aryan state”. Within recent memory, we had white-supremacist Rhodesia and apartheid South Africa. Whatever limits there are to analogies from and to these white supremacist regimes, we have learned that states that define themselves with reference to the domination of one ethnic group cannot claim legitimacy.

Israel and its allies insist that the Palestinian victims of Zionism must “recognize Israel as a Jewish state with a Jewish majority.” No one seems concerned about the fact that this ultimatum flies in the face of elementary democratic values regarding human equality and human rights. Israel’s backers seek to legitimize that which is illegitimate by any standard of democracy.

1 Reply