« Back to story "Could Drivers Face Total Cell Phone Bans?"

Story Comments

Posted by: sarahturner 11 months, 1 week ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

91%
sarahturner11 months, 1 week ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

Ban them except for emergencies or for reporting drunk drivers.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
3 Replies

loading ...
- 100%
  willottica11 months, 1 week ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  ...or for reporting drivers who are impaired because they're talking on cellphones.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...
- 100%
  zqqq11 months, 1 week ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  nice one
  :)
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...
- 100%
  Bucotch11 months, 1 week ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  When drunk, not a single subject rear-ended the pace car in the experiment. However, three of the subjects crashed into the car while talking on the phone.
  
  Drunk driving is, without a doubt, a significant danger. However, we may want to reconsider how we chose to doll out our moral outrage. Cell phone vs. can of beer, no difference.
  
  http://www.duianswer.com/library/drunk-driving-ver...
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...