« Back to story "Karl Rove Subpoenaed! I've NEVER Seen Olbermann John Dean Look Happier :)"

Story Comments

Posted by: Endoscopy 10 months, 3 weeks ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

14%
Endoscopy10 months, 3 weeks ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

The process is the same. If it worked for Clinton why not Bush. There were Aids to Clinton who either had areas where they would not answer questions or not appear at all. That is a fact you are leaving out. Several aids to Bush testified as well. Always the Republican is wrong and the Democrat is right. Your bias is showing.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
6 Replies

loading ...
- 100%
  jovial10 months, 3 weeks ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  Links please.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  5 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - Neutral
    BBcamaro10 months, 3 weeks ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    Here's one right quick, on lunch don't really have time to really look some more up.
    
    http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P2-6604314.html
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    4 Replies
    
    loading ...
    - 100%
      jovial10 months, 3 weeks ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      Here's a quick one for you.
      http://sitesearch.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politi...
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      0 Replies
      
      loading ...
    - 100%
      djn3nunez310 months, 3 weeks ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      BBcamaro - Come back after lunch and see what the courts did in the above case
      
      http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P2-6618400.html
      
      Court blocks Clinton's executive privilege bid in Lewinsky case White House aides must answer grand jury questions, judge rules
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      2 Replies
      
      loading ...
      - 100%
        BBcamaro10 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        You're right the "COURT" blocked it. Most of the aides that did answer questions had preset conditions on what questions could be asked. Even though the court ruled against him, it still proves that Clinton used "Executive Privilege" to protect his aides. Yes or No? The court has not ruled yet in the Carl Rowe's case yet.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        loading ...
        
        100%
        jovial10 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Preset conditions or not. They weren't able to just refuse, as is the case before us now. But thanks for the having the humility to admit the inaccuracy.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...