Citing Obama Opposition, FCC's McDowell Warns Against Fairness Doctrine - Multichannel News »

Posted By pc25 10 months, 1 week ago in News

FCC commissioner Robert McDowell had a message for Democrats, or anyone else contemplating trying to reimpose the fairness doctrine: The move could undermine the justification for existing localism and children's TV regulations, and could be used against public radio.

Read Full Story at multichannel.com »

587 Views Share Story 38 Comments Report

Submitted By:
pc25

studio engineer, studio musician, producer

Who Also Submitted: All »
Other Related Articles: All »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 38 (view all)
- Display
  • 90%
    pc2510 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    FTA

    The fairness doctrine was scrapped by the FCC as unconstitutional in 1987.

    Actually, in a string of media cases stretching back over more than 20 years, various judges on the D.C. Circuit - both Democratic and Republican appointees - have suggested that it is time for the Supreme Court to rethink the concept of spectrum scarcity as a justification for limiting broadcasters' First Amendment rights. A revived Doctrine would provide a big, bright bulls-eye for those who wish to make that happen. That development would have implications far beyond the Doctrine itself. Much of our content regulation of broadcasters - including most of the FCC's existing localism rules and the regulations requiring three hours a week of children's programming - rest on the spectrum scarcity rationale. If that rationale is invalidated, serious legal challenges to all those other content rules may follow."
    McDowell said he was hopeful that the Obama administration understood all this.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    13 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 80%
    pc2510 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Is Limbaugh that cunning to have forced the issue, or is Obama that naive to have played into the conservatives hands on this.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    8 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 86%
    nostalgia10 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    FTA:
    FCC commissioner Robert McDowell had a message for Democrats, or anyone else contemplating trying to reimpose the fairness doctrine: The move could undermine the justification for existing localism and children's TV regulations, and could be used against public radio.

    My, my, my Commissioner McDowell saying a Fairness Doctrine could be used AGAINST public radio!

    Sometimes you find the truth in the most unexpected places!

    Wonder if NPR will be reporting this AP story:

    Hill Republican: Stimulus aids illegal immigrants

    WASHINGTON (AP) — A top Republican congressional aide says the $800 billion-plus economic stimulus measure could steer government checks to illegal immigrants.

    Republican officials are concerned that the Democratic-written legislation makes people who came to the United States illegally eligible for tax credits of $500 per worker and $1,000 per couple.

    A House-passed version of the bill and one making its way through the Senate both disqualify nonresident aliens from receiving the credits. But neither requires a worker to have a Social Security number to get the credits.

    An economic aid measure enacted in February 2008 that sent rebates to most wage earners required that people have valid Social Security numbers in order to get checks.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    10 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 67%
    cherev10 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    "a stealth version of the doctrine may already be teed up at the FCC in the form of community advisory boards to help determine local programming. McDowell says he is fine with those boards if they are voluntary--some stations already seek such input. But that if they are required, as the FCC has proposed, "Would not such a policy be akin to re-imposition of the Doctrine, albeit under a different name and sales pitch?""

    "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." - Thomas Jefferson.

    "The strongest reason for people to retain their right to keep and bear arms is as a last resort to protect themselves against tyranny in government." - Thomas Jefferson

    The Fairness Doctrine, in whatever form, is a form of tyranny.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 60%
      slate10 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Ever notice that only fairness goes with making the 'right' be fair? And then ONLY fair on the radio waves?

      Not NPR, not Air America

      Noooooooo not the MSM they ARE fair, why just look at the last election coverage. Didn't that "fair' and balanced coverage just send a tingle up your leg?

      The only place you are hearing a dissenting view of the 5 executive orders in LESS THAN A WEEK, the tax dodging Treasury Secretary, the 4 billion dollars (more than given to major corps. that would actually create jobs)going to the ACORN organization that registered more people than lived in areas and is being looked into in 12 states, hiring 3 lobbyists after claiming he would not do that, one booted (Richardson)even before he could get the nod from the Senate.

      Fairness Doctrine means less free speech of 'choice', since people chose to listen to these radio programs because they don't think they are getting the real skinny from the obviously partisan leftist that 'pretend' to be objective as their legs tingle for the Democrats. At least when you go to 'right wing' radio, you know what you are getting and they make no bones about their views on a talk program that doesn't 'pretend' to be a non biased news source like the tingly guys on da left.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        EDWARDIII10 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Fairness. It sounds so...fair. Who could be against a doctrine so named? Who among us is against fairness?

        There should be a rule against nicy-nice names for insidious ligislation.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          k9kssr10 months, 1 week ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          {"statusText": "Internal Server Error: Comment matching query does not exist.", "statusCode": 500}

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          View All 38 Comments

          Add a Comment

          Sign In With Your Propeller Account

          Forgot your password?

          Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

          To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

          More News