Story Comments
Posted by: bruhaha 10 months, 1 week ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
88%
bruhaha10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Republicans won't back anything Obama proposes unless it is exactly what they want....so why bother. Compromise only works if both sides agree to compromise. The Republicans have made it abundantly clear that they will not compromise.
Reply-
60%
nostalgia10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The House version lacks focus and has not set priorities
Reply
As more and more info comes out critics from the right and left are hammering the House version
Boston Globe: Only 5 percent of $819b plan would go toward infrastructure
Critics say transportation is shortchanged
WSJ:
Congressional office admits:
Obama stimulus plan won’t meet job-creation target
On several of the business shows yesterday the estimate was creation of 1 - 1 1/2 million jobs with the House version
We can only hope that the Senate has more sense that the Pelosi House-
50%
nostalgia10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
That was 6 years then Congress was turned over to the Democrats for the last 2 years
Reply
Frankly, I didn't see much difference
I didn't like the first 6 years so I certainly didn't like the last 2 years of Bush either
But that is what happens when there are very few fiscal conservatives left on the Republican side of the aisle to team up with the Blue Dog Democrats and return the country to fiscal responsibility
"More pork under bush than ever before"
I think the Pelosi House just managed to surpass pork barrel spending for a number of years in one giant pork barrel spending bill -
-
63%
nostalgia10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
That's why I have to hope the Senate version is much better than the fiasco created by Pelosi and her cronies
Reply
As I posted on another thread:
After reading story after story on how the House version of the bill was crafted this is not the bill Obama had in mind. This massive boondoggle was created by Pelosi and her cronies behind closed doors - no Republicans allowed. The portions of the bill went to the 3 House committees after it was already drafted
I guess Pelosi didn't get the memo on bipartisanship
Pelosi stuck it to Obama with this bill. Now it is his and what is he supposed to do? Have a showdown with Pelosi? Do you think he has the backbone to do that with his own Speaker?
That's the test isn't it?
I suspect the Obama team will work with the Senate and you are going to see a very different version of the bill. Although heaven only knows what will happen once this goes to a conference committee and they have to reconcile 2 radically different versions of this bill-
67%
fiftynine10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Did you pay attention when the repubs were loading every bill with pork over the previous eight years,and had the majority's necessary to push them through..More pork under bush than ever before...You all got kicked to the curb for a reason.
Reply -
100%
ybdogsct10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
NOSTALGIA:
Reply
"I suspect the Obama team will work with the Senate and you are going to see a very different version of the bill. Although heaven only knows what will happen once this goes to a conference committee and they have to reconcile 2 radically different versions of this bill"
As I understand it, that has been precisely Obama's strategy since Day 1. The goal is to get the stimulus package signed by President's Day, but Congress would not have reached that deadline if the stimulus were stuck in the House in debate.
So he allowed the House to pass the bill as is in order to get the legislative process moving along, but is now pressuring Senate Democrats to make compromises with Republicans. Once the Senate passes its version, Obama will throw the White House's support behind the more bipartisan Senate version and may encourage even more compromises to be made as the two versions are reconciled.
http://www.examiner.com/a-1818337~Obama_open_to_co...
"Democratic leaders in both houses have promised to have legislation ready for Obama's signature by mid-February [with] national economy seemingly growing weaker by the day.
One Republican later quoted the president as saying any changes would have to come after the House gives what is expected to be largely party-line approval Wednesday to the Democratic-backed bill.
The Senate shows signs of greater bipartisanship, including a decision in the Finance Committee on Tuesday to add a new tax break for upper middle-income taxpayers. It was advanced by Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the panel's senior Republican. Several hours after Mr. Obama’s visit to the Capitol, the Senate Finance Committee approved Mr. Grassley’s proposal as an amendment to the emerging Senate economic recovery plan."
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/28/us/politics/28ob...
-
-
-
-
73%
nostalgia10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Someone needs to obstruct Pelosi and her cronies before they destroy the country
Reply
The House wants to panic everyone so their boondoggle will be passed quickly before the general public becomes aware of what is really in the bill - all of the payoffs to their interest groups which will have zero impact on a recovery
Looks like the Senate isn't buying into that nonsense-
40%
mesodude10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"Someone needs to obstruct Pelosi and her cronies before they destroy the country"
Reply
--I wasn't aware something that was already lying in ruin could be "destroyed". But I think that level of cluelessness pretty well sums up why the GOP is in flames and out of power.
-
-
58%
amazed10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
..but we need to do something and do something fast!
Reply
Here's an alternative idea. How 'bout we take a little bit of time -- a couple of weeks maybe -- and get a bill that might actually address some of the problems?
...oh no, I'm so sorry to be obstructionist!-
75%
fiftynine10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"Someone needs to obstruct Pelosi and her cronies before they destroy the country"...I don't care for pelosi,never did,but as far as destroying the country...lol...what you see is reagonomics and eight years of the rights lunacy...Not the democrats.
Reply -
88%
dunkirk10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Im curious where was the outrage when Bush and his rubber stamp Congress were busy creating this mess?? It is interesting to not ethat the REPUBLICANS were busy spending anad borrowing like crazy to create this mess and not a single peep form the right wing wacks on here about the massive debt and un sound econimic policies that are leading to the next Depression. BUT when a Democratic President initiates legislation to help the common man then they riasie in an uproar., It might have more meaning IF you had done the same when this disaster was being created.
Reply -
100%
Beau789010 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
amazed, you realize that taking "a little bit of time" to "get a bill that might actually address some of theproblems" isn't what House Republicans had in mind, right? Even after Obama met with them to attempt to compromise on the bill, they all voted against it because it didn't include enough tax cuts--which is a strategy that hasn't worked for years.
Reply-
75%
amazed10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
fine, then let the DEMOCRATS come up with something that actually has a chance of working instead of a huge, deferred spending bill that is a thinly veiled attempt at social realignment.
Reply
The stimulus should be one bill, the social engineering should be another.
I dont' really care WHO comes up with something realistic, but some one needs to rather than just continuing on the same old way...and that's what this is.-
100%
Beau789010 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
How is this the same old way? It's not what we've been trying for the past several years.
Reply
It is something closer to the New Deal, in that it involves massive government spending on programs that create jobs. (Regardless of what many think, spending for new programs in various sectors in this country that aren't run by stockholders will create jobs, even though many disagree about whether those sectors perform worthwhile functions. For instance--not that this is even in the stimulus bill--giving lots of money to Planned Parenthood will allow it to hire more people.) Perhaps any similarity to the New Deal is what you mean by the same old way. Some say the New Deal didn't work, but I'd disagree with that assessment--the facts simply don't bear that out.
-
-
-
100%
flyonthewallzz10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
http://www.forbes.com/2008/11/17/layoff-tracker-un...
Reply
Number of layoffs since Nov. 1, 2008, at America's 500 largest public companies*:
total........ 362,335
November......91,250.......25%
December....108,123.......30%
January.........162,962.......45%-
100%
flyonthewallzz10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
Reply
workforce....unemployed.....percent
Oct...154,878,000..10,221,000...6.60%
Nov...154,620,000..10,476,000..6.78%
Dec ..154,447,000...11,108,00....7.19%
change. -431,000...-887,000
-
-
-
-
-
80%
nostalgia10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"Why should that concern them since the party in control of the White House usually gets blamed no matter what?"
Reply
From the comments on here it seems that only liberals believe that
I totally blame Congress for all spending - the House is the only part of govt which can appropriate money
-
-
-
39%
Hhussk10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I dont see why they cant get it passed.
Reply
That's because you don't understand liberal ideology. Liberals are not leaders. They rule based on polls, soundbytes, class warefare, and opposition.
Well, now that they can't oppose themselves, they need to create a scapegoat. If they can get Republicans to join them, any failure (and it will fail) will be explained as "bipartisanship".
Look at Blagojevich and Illinois. The state could have held a special election to circumvent the whole problem, but that would have meant the chance for a Republican to step into office. So, they didn't. And then, Blagojevich got caught in a scandel. What did the liberals do? They gave him a mock trial, restricting him from the ability to even call witnesses, and got rid of him before he was even charged with a crime.
It's the liberal way of justice.-
44%
BBcamaro10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You mean the bail out that our Democrat president just did the same thing with the other half of that bail out? Yes it will do the same as the first half did and that's to absorbed all these bad loans morons in this country created by buying houses they knew they could not afford. I did not agree with the bail out from the very beginning!
Reply
As for the economy stimulus package from the house, please tell me how the 300 million dollars the house planned for contraceptives was going to help this country and all the other junk in there! I hope you can do a better job than Pelosi did. Do you really want you kids paying for all that garbage in the package? -
80%
nostalgia10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"The so called bailouts for the banks by the Republicans"
Reply
You missed what happened with that entirely
That entire bailout was planned by King Henry and Prince Timothy in Prince Timothy's NY office no less
That "bailouts for the banks by the Republicans" was actually bipartisan!
No Child left behind - bipartisan
Repeal Glass Steagall act bipartisan
Campaign Finance Reform - bipartisan
Ain't bipartisanship grand? -
40%
BB6410 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Why would we? The GOP has been under attack since we won the majority in the 90's. I find it funny that when you guys toss road block on top of road block, you feel that's a compromise. When the GOP clearly states they won't back a huge pork bill like this, we're evil. Have you read the budget the House supported? In the end less than 12cents of every dollar actually is stimulus. I support anyone including Dems that didn't support this.
Reply -
60%
mesodude10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"That's because you don't understand liberal ideology. Liberals are not leaders. They rule based on polls, soundbytes, class warefare, and opposition."
Reply
--Republicans are amazing leaders, Hhussk. That's why Obama and a Democratically controlled House and Senate are now sorting out how to clean up after Bush and the GOP's 8 year-long clusterf*ck. Oh well...Keep blathering about socialism. That was a REAL winner of a campaign strategy for McCain, wasn't it? ;-P-
-
67%
mesodude10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Thanks, Endo but I think I'll adopt the con approach to judging a President's performance. Remember the one you're using for Bush? Yessiree--I've decided that cons won't know how Obama is doing until 50 years (maybe longer...why not?) after he leaves office. Yeah, that's the ticket. ;-P
Reply
-
-
-
100%
Beau789010 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Hhussk, you really need to look back past the Bush administration at the history of Republican Congressional opposition before making ridiculous pronouncements about sound bytes, class warfare and opposition.
Reply
And try not to bring up Blagojevich and Illinois until you do a little homework on the subject. It only serves to highlight your ignorance of the subject. (As just one example, Blagojevich refused to submit a list of witnesses he intended to call before the deadline expired--he had two weeks to do so.)-
-
-
-
-
20%
BBcamaro10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Are you kidding me? Did you watch any of the news channels the week prior to the inauguration? Democrat's calling Democrat's racist, Democrat's refusing to seat fellow Democrat's in the senate. I can understand the left wanting to forget about all the happening but really. Yes Blagojevich may be a crook, he hasn't been convicted yet, but he sure made the Democrats on the hill look like idiots.
Reply-
100%
Beau789010 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Your comment above about ending slavery doesn't make any sense when talking about Blagojevich, so unless you can explain that further, I'll assume that's a misplaced comment.
Reply
As far as Democrats fighting amongst each other, they do that all the time. Big deal. What does that have to do with Harry Reid?
Impeachment in Illinois has nothing to do with whether anyone's been convicted of a crime--it's enough that the legislators lost confidence in the governor's ability to do his job. They're perfectly justified in impeaching him.
Here's a link I've posted before that explains how Blagojevich's claims of being "railroaded" are pure BS. Take a look, if you're really interested in truth rather than just using what happened in Springfield as an example you don't really understand.-
Neutral
BBcamaro10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Yeah, I don't know how it wound up here the ending slavery comment was in response to a question fiftynine put up asking about what the republicans have done for civil rights, however it seems that entire section is missing now. Just a vapor trail.
Reply -
Neutral
BBcamaro10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I'm not saying he is a good guy that has been wronged, more than likely he will be convicted. However in this country you are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law yes or no?
Reply
All I wanted to point out is how he made Harry Reid stand up and say he would not seat Blago's appointment to the seat, and the whole safe face thing afterward.-
100%
bruhaha10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You are ignoring everything that Beau said about Blago. Impeachment, especially in Illinois, is not a criminal trial. In essence it is a political trial. Yes, in this country, you are innocent until proven guilty....in a court of law. Impeachment is not a court of law, it is a political proceeding.
Reply -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
33%
BBcamaro10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Well here are few more for you from just one web site. We could spend months looking more up.
Reply
At the end of the war, despite their strong majorities, Republicans in Congress knew they wouldn’t have a majority forever. Anticipating that the Democrats might someday come back into power, Republicans unanimously voted for what became the 13th Amendment to the Constitution -- thereby putting an end to slavery.
1869, the Republicans proposed yet another constitutional amendment, this one specifically guaranteeing blacks the right to vote. The same partisanship was in evidence: 98% of Republicans voted for it; 97% of the Democrats voted against it.
What we now know as the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution -- is a purely Republican achievement, because every single Democrat in Congress voted against the 14th Amendment. That is another fact deftly omitted from American history textbooks these days: we owe our Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection of the laws and due process to Republicans.
In 1872, the first black governor took office in Louisiana. I love his name: Pinckney Pinchback, a great Republican. Our own state of California was the first to have a Hispanic governor. Can you guess his political party? Republican Romualdo Pacheco became governor in 1875, long before anybody had ever heard of Cruz Bustamante.
President Eisenhower won passage of his landmark Civil Rights Act of 1957. Now remember, the nation had just ended a long stretch of Democratic administrations -- nearly four terms of FDR, and seven years of Truman -- and yet there had been no civil rights legislation at all. In fact, the Republican Civil Rights Act of 1957 was the first U.S. civil rights legislation in eight decades.
Republican appointments such as Justice Clarence Thomas, the former Chairman of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; Colin Powell, the first African American to be National Security adviser or Secretary of State; Condoleezza Rice, the first woman to serve as National Security adviser; and Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao, the first Asian American woman in any president’s Cabinet.
http://www.politicalbase.com/forums/topic/historic...
-
-
-
loading ...
STONERS
jordan11
fsev41
Will1313
bluetexasvalley
mmrhe
Jeboba
FrauBlucher
Dionys
JEBUS08
GWHayduke
dunkirk
lvrofwolves
Ciera-Marie
mesodude
Beau7890
flyonthewallzz
Pupi
doppich
automan909
jimdoze
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.