Story Comments
Posted by: k9kssr 10 months, 1 week ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
-
100%
RedRiverJ10 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Why do you think the congress did this at night? So they can ram their will down our throats and once they do it's too late, it's done.
Reply
People really need to wake up, this is a threat to our very way of life. The democrats will do anything to be the majority. They know poor people will vote for them because they are the give away party, they will dole out entitlements to poor people, use them, promise them anything to get them to vote for them.
That's what this is all about. Votes.
Carlos Slim Helú, the Mexican telecommunications billionaire, and his family have acquired a 6.4 percent stake in The New York Times Company. So we can expect PRO BIAS for illegal amnesty from the times.
In 1970, nine percent of California's population was foreign born. Now it is an astounding 28 percent, and most of the new voters are Democrats.
So the Dems now control power in California. It is a virtual one-party state — its 55 electoral votes a lock for the Democrats.
New York is almost a one-party state, that's 31 electoral votes. Illinois, controlled by Democrats, another 21 electoral votes.
If blanket amnesty is passed, the Democratic ranks in places like Colorado, Arizona, Nevada and Florida will explode, putting our two-party system in jeopardy. That's exactly what The Times envisions.
And guess who is also a big blanket amnesty guy? Hey, there, George Soros. The far-left billionaire has donated big money to open border groups.
And then there's the ACLU, actively working against many laws that constrain illegal immigration, and opposing strict border enforcement.
So let's add this up. The Times, Soros, the ACLU. Quite a lineup.
If these people succeed in getting blanket amnesty passed for illegals and their families living abroad, the political system in America will change forever.
That's why The Times has branded me a racist — because I have unmasked them. They can't deny it, so they trot out the smear machine. A very troubling situation.-
100%
icono110 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Interesting;
Reply
"They know poor people will vote for them because they are the give away party, they will dole out entitlements to poor people, use them, promise them anything to get them to vote for them."
In effect; 'the vote goes to he who has the money to hand out'. Buying votes?????
So if, politically and fiscally, a person does not agree with that policy, buying votes through programs for the immigrant and indigenous poor, then they are now a 'Racist'. In effect; Racism is now determined by political and fiscal beliefs
The word 'Racist' used to mean.(Merriam Webster); a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.
Interesting how the definition and therefore use,of the word 'Racist' has been changed by our current presidential primaries and election.
Interesting how the meaning of certain words can be changed to suit the political needs of the controlling political party. Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union did the same thing. Now America is also.
-
-
loading ...
People Who Liked This Comment (2)
icono1
y_soitenlyPeople Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)
No one voted this comment negatively.
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.