« Back to story "Wyoming anti-gay bill dies | 365 Gay News"

Story Comments

Posted by: Beau7890 10 months, 1 week ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

100%
Beau789010 months, 1 week ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

What part of David's comment is a complete 180 from saying it's not an issue for the voters?

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
3 Replies

loading ...
- Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive2 Replies
  - 80%
    david_nwpa10 months, 1 week ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    That was not what I said at all. My point, if you read my comment carefully, is that an anti-gay bill, meaning opposed to gay marriage, would have passed if handed to the voters. The nitwit religious right must be foaming at the mouth if they thought this one was getting past the legislature and into the voters' hands. I also said marriage rights have no business being decided by the voters. Do you get it now, GW?
    
    Incidentally, I am not the nitwit that you claim I am.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    1 Reply
    
    loading ...
    - 80%
      Beau789010 months, 1 week ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      It might have helped him understand what you were saying if he'd read the story as well...or the story summary above...or the story's headline.
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      0 Replies
      
      loading ...