Story Comments
Posted by: Goppy 10 months, 3 weeks ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-

Goppy10 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
And yet ... what is The Modern Republican take?
Reply
As phrased so eloquently by Sarah Palin during the campaign ...
The Federal Government just needs to ... 'Get Out Of The Way of Business'.
.
But my new understanding of The Modern Republican Party has led me to understand their solution for this issue .... TAX CUTS FOR THE WEALTHY ... FOR TO TRICKLE DOWN TO THE MIDDLE CLASS.
(I've had the epiphany that this is their mantra for every problem or issue.)
.-

Hhussk10 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"And let me say this to all of the chattering class that so much focuses on those little, tiny - yes - porky amendments: the American people really don't care."
Reply
~Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), February 11, 2009, On Senate Floor
This is the liberal solution?-

Goppy10 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Your words are empty, Hhussk.
Reply
You never complained when the Republicans controlled ALL branches of the Federal Government for 6 straight years.
For 6 straight years, you and my fellow Conservatives never complained about the 'unprecedented pork-fest'.
For 6 straight years, you and my fellow Conservatives never complained about the 'pay-to-play' schemes.
For 6 straight years, you and my fellow Conservatives never complained about the burgeoning size of Government (THIRTY PERCENT INCREASE) that Bush & co presided over.
The point is, Hhussk, The Modern Republican has given NO thought to ANY solution .... other than TAX CUTS FOR THE WEALTHY.
This single solution blinds them to every other form of behavior.
They can spend more in 8 years than all Congresses before them ... COMBINED ... and they don't worry because they believe that TAX CUTS FOR THE WEALTHY will solve any outflow from spending.
They can start wars and not fund them because they believe that ... TAX CUTS FOR THE WEALTHY will solve any bankruptcy issues.
They can ignore their duty as Regulators because they believe that ... if their cynicism towards the role of the Federal Government causes problems ... they believe that ... TAX CUTS FOR THE WEALTHY will pick up the pieces.
Ideology is a funny thing ... maybe even an idiotic thing ... when discussing real life issues.
.
-
-
libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned3 Replies
-
-

Goppy10 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Well sure you would ... because you're used to Government giving handouts.
Reply
Military Contractors ... Banks ... Corporations ... these have been the recipients of Government Welfare for quite a while. You've probably grown quite used to it.
But has it helped our nation become stronger? Obviously not.
I believe you'll get over the unpleasantness of it all from a 'personal' standpoint ... and learn to respect the character building aspects of this approach.
.-

BB6410 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Hand outs? When someone orders a slushy from your counter, you collect the money when you give them the slushy right? I don't get hand outs. If the government or private firm wants to order a plant, I sell them a plant. We pay taxes like most people do. We employ a lot of people and provide a ton of benefits. So I'm not sure how or why you're claiming I've received a handout.
Reply
As to capitalism, yesterday there was a posting quoting Putin warning Bacon about his communist, I mean socialist plan. Former KGB general giving the president of the United States a lesson in capitalism verses socialism. How times have changed.-

JEBUS0810 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
you cant argue the banks didnt get welfare, and as far as the military contractors: getting a no bid contract is pretty much welfare for they end up getting money for goods and services they never end up supplying -
Reply
if you dont like socialism i suggest you take a private copter to your business and stay off of my roads, i would also appreciate it if you would keep your family out of my parks, schools, and libraries - also dont count on the fire or police dept coming to rescue you because they will be busy saving people who appreciate their help
-
-

icono110 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Comrade Guppy as Maggie Thacher said and Putin strongly implied about the trouble with socialism is simply this.... 'it runs into trouble when you run out of everybody else's money'.
Reply
Oh by the way Comrade Guppy ,if you got no money, you get no food and heat, and starvatrion, while being bone cold, builds all kinds of character.
-
-

sinophil4910 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
BB - Trickle-down economics, or supply side economics has now proven to be a massive failure and bankrupt as a guiding economic principle.
Reply
Sadly, supply side economics COULD have worked if the Republican party remembered the second half of the principle. That is, the economy can improve if you cut taxes AND SPENDING SIMULTANEOUSLY. Reagan and Bushes all forgot the 2nd half. All Republicans were interested in were cutting taxes and INCREASING spending. This is an absolute recipe for massive deficits and rising debt.
Supply side economics, in the hands of Republicans, also will fail without a concomitant oversight and regulatory control to prevent the economic plunder we are now realizing has been occuring in all corporations. Cutting taxes to the rich, relaxing safety and environmental laws, cutting the budgets of all the regulatory agencies, simply mean that the rich will simply take home all the increased money and NOT pass it down to the employees or hold cost down to the consumer.
THERE HAS BEEN NO TRICKLE DOWN UNDER THE REPUBLICAN RULE.
Last year there was $18 billion given out in corporate executive bonuses. The effective tax burden on the rich proportionately went down. While that on the poor and middle class went up.
Why? Because of the decreased revenues, local governments all had to increase their user fees, license fees, college fees, sales taxes, permit fees, etcf, etc. Programs that helped the poor went under-funded - like the No Child Left Behind program, WIC program, mentally ill programs, etc.
To summarize, Trickle Down economics is a failure and a fraud.-

beavith110 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
the top 1% of taxpayers pay 50% of taxes. the top 10% pay 70%. The top 20% pay 80%.
Reply
proportionally, if the poor and middle class went up. samll proportion is still small proportion.
'To summarize, Trickle Down economics is a failure and a fraud.'
and you've been taken in by the lefty libs. everything you say is democratic election rhetoric.
it wasn't trickle down economics that failed. it was a lag in the Gov't figuring out that unregulated growth in a small, new, but extremely lucrative 'investment vehicle' was out of control.
-
-
-
-

Georgia5010 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Goop,
Reply
Partisan hacks like yourself notwithstanding, how is corruption in business a partisan issue? Sure...we can nit-pick and take potshots once the party of a corrupt person is known. Cause and effect might be a bit trickier to prove...not that you of all people ever require evidence for you daily rants. -

rimbaud10 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The Republicans MAY BE right, but they have lost credibility, and their self-righteousness (like McCain's on the Senate floor) just doesn't play well (we cannot suspend our disbelief). Maybe they can frame their cause in different words than those we've been hearing all the way down to where we are, today.
Reply -
-
People Who Liked This Comment (28)
People Who Didn't Like This Comment (7)
Submit a Story
Advertisement

loading ...
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.