Dow Nears Lowest Level in a Decade »

Posted By TechnologyExpert 9 months, 2 weeks ago in Business & Finance

A global wave of selling from Hong Kong to Stockholm to London battered financial markets on Tuesday, sending shares sharply lower on Wall Street. The major indexes were down about 3 percent as investors worried about how banks, automakers and entire countries would fare in a deepening recession.

Read Full Story at nytimes.com »

706 Views Share Story 40 Comments Report

Submitted By:
TechnologyExpert

I am Editor-in-Chief at Alice Hill's RealTechNews (http://www.realtechnews.com). I also have my own blog (Tech-Ex) at http://TechnologyExpert.Blogspot.com. Finally ...

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 40 (view all)
- Display
  • 70%
    nostalgia9 months, 2 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Gee the markets have no confidence in the Obama stimulus package??
    The markets don't think the boy wonder, Geitner, is going to save the financial system and stop foreclosures?
    The markets don't think the committee being set up by Obama to oversee the auto industry is going to get results?

    Someone needs to send some of that Obama Kool Aid to Wall St

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    7 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 75%
    Wolfie20079 months, 2 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Wow, Obama's Porkulous Bill is tanking markets all over the world.
    Now what are we going to do? LSHIPMP!!

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    3 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 60%
    Justice4All9 months, 2 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    This is the economy Bush created. Let's wait 2 or 3 years and see what Obama can fix. He'll be doing good just trying to keep things from getting worse.
    Bush made a huge mess.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    9 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 40%
    dBergeron9 months, 2 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    The market has reacted negatively since the election. Investors are not only concerned about the bailout and stimulus, but also capital gains tax increases. It seems that Obama is not concerned with the market's performance. Most of this was predicted by many financial experts who were not consulted before any of this economic re-structuring was unleashed. It does not take a rocket scientist to draw this conclusion. And for the excuse that this was created by Bush, that's bull shiite. The market did quite well under Bush. Even up until the end, the market was still performing in a positive direction. This was even with the drag of many financial firms pulling it down.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    6 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    jordan119 months, 2 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Is it worth it to bother with people living in a partisan tunnel about what we're facing & why? Naw. I'll leave that insignificant minority to it.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 0%
      jimdoze9 months, 2 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      The stock markets are leading indicators of economic activity.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      2 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 100%
      jmopinion9 months, 2 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      People are losing their shirts in the market not to mention their nest eggs.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        canadianrancher579 months, 2 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        So the stock market is tanking, well maybe it was just another thing that was overpriced. It seems society places much value on these pieces of paper that can be traded and make one rich with out really much connection with the business but more of a connection to the economy. There seem to have been quite a few of these bubbles in the last 8-9 years and this is likely just another. My grandfather worked until he was 92 and was very well to do and never owned any stocks but believed in the idea that production made wealth, which seems to have been forgotten by many people today.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          flyonthewallzz9 months, 2 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          http://www.gpoaccess.gov/eop/2008/B95.xls

          Folks may not be interested in looking at spreadsheets.
          This one offers some interesting empirical evidence.
          It kind of proves the law of supply and demand.
          When the DOW goes down earnings per share and dividends tend to go up.
          It takes merging data that I do not time to point to now , but it also appears that cuts in the top income tax and capitol gains tax also reduce the earnings per share and dividend values.
          There are anomalies and they seem to coincide with energy cost fluctuations.
          This economic situation is global, it is far easier for me to peg it to energy and war spending, than home loans in this country.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply

          1 Reply

          loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          cspezial9 months, 2 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          I read yesterday that GM and Chrysler, while asking for a second round of government loans, are at the same time planning on idling more plants in the US. No matter what side of the aisle you're on politically, and no matter if you agree with bailouts, "stimulus plans", and government loans, I hope we can all agree that the only way we can become prosperous is to actually produce goods here in the US. There was a time, not too long ago, that the US not only produced it's own goods, but actually exported goods. Not services, but actual goods. We need to bring back the steel industry, the consumer goods industry, the electronics industry, to name a few. Is it protectionism? Yes. We elect our president to protect us, and I think he should do just that. I may take some heat for this view, I guess, but at the end of the day, I can not see how we can be a profitable country if no one, including ourselves, it seems, buy goods that are Made in the USA. Tacitly, while the new administration has not come right our and admitted this, they have hinted at it, by saying for example that the auto industry is crucial to national security (which of course it is). Does it bother anyone that our new president campaigned on the platform that he will "create 3 million new jobs", but now his plan is to "create or conserve 3 million new jobs"? Where did the conserve come from? How will he know if he is successful? Lastly, does it bother anyone (other than me...) that the President of Mexico comes to the US to campaign? Why would another country's leader come to OUR country to campaign for his job? I have some thoughts on the matter... At the end of the day, folks, I think we are in for a rough ride unless something substantial can be done. I can tell you this - a company, with our debt, and our cost over runs (budget deficits), would have had to file for Chapter II long ago - the only thing keeping us afloat is the willingness of foreign countries, for whatever reason, to purchase our debt (and the lack of a gold standard allowing us to print new money when we need it helps...). At some point they will stop doing that. Flame away...

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          View All 40 Comments

          Add a Comment

          Sign In With Your Propeller Account

          Forgot your password?

          Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

          To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

          Submit a Story

          Advertisement

          Story Tags ?

          djia dow_jones stock_market recession

          Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

          Real Estate Info

          Get the Latest Market Info for Your Area



          Foreclosures | Short Sale

          Luxury Homes | Homes for Sale

          First Time Home Buyer Advice



          Also Dropping This Article

          No one has dropped this story.

          Also Submitted By

          No one else has submitted this story.