Recovery Through Debt Slavery »

Posted By Shana4Liberty 9 months, 1 week ago in News

Does it make sense that our “economic growth” requires our taking on new debt at an accelerating rate to prevent defaults from exponentially-growing compound interest? The root of our problem isn’t partisan politics — it’s high school math that is lost on our economists and central bankers.

Read Full Story at unitedliberty.org »

596 Views Share Story 27 Comments Report

Submitted By:
Shana4Liberty

I'm a stay-at-homeschooling mom of 4 living in central Alabama, but a native of south Texas. Feel free to friend me and send me ...

Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 27 (view all)
- Display
  • 100%
    cowboygrandpa9 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    I remember something my dad taught me. It takes money to make money.

    If you are not willing to invest the money, the venture you are proposing is not viable to you.

    Saving money for a down payment of a house or a car is great. But having no money to save because prices are out of kilter with value, leaves us where we have arrived.

    We need to put America back to work and build it up again.

    Everybody wants a piece of the pie. But not everybody wants to pay for it. That is the problem as I see it.

    Stop bailing out poor business operations and you will reduce the debt.

    Start investing in small and medium businesses that will grow the economy, strengthen America and put people back to work.

    We have become dependent upon corporate America and they are a
    huge drain on our finances. They are taking way more than they giving.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    3 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    CHAM9 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Great article Shana. And you are right on Cowboy. I see the problem from a different perspective than most I guess. I see the problem being that too much wealth has flowed to too few people. What has happened is that those few have sucked the financial life out of the economy because they began to horde their ill gotten gains, they became greedy and began to gamble. The best gamblers ( many with loaded dice ) brought the nations wealth into an even smaller group and they in fact did decide to put the country into economic slavery.

    They froze the flow of money, holding it out of circulation until they could get free handouts ( bailouts ) and freedom to rob the less well heeled ( deregulation).

    But this is a house of cards over the long run. Sooner or later the people will rise up in anarchy.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    4 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    tadair9199 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    you mean borrowing, printing, and directly taxing money to have our grandchildren pay for isn't going to work?

    weird.

    questions i should have asked myself:

    if we borrow the money, doesn't that mean the money must be paid back with even more interest?

    if we print the money out of thin air, doesn't that mean we have to pay for the inflation tax?

    if we owe 8,000 per every man, woman, and child then who is going to step up and pay for those who don't?

    who's money is the government giving away? is it the government's money, or is it our money?

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    icono19 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    FTA;
    "...The root of our problem isn’t partisan politics — it’s high school math that is lost on our economists and central bankers."

    Very true.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      unome29 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Revolution

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        Harbeas9 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Our economy is based on spending or consumerism, if you will. When we don't spend our economy tanks. I am not for a 750 billion dollar infusion for our economy because it is far too much. We could easily have cut that amount in half. However, for those who have offered no other fix other than to let companies go bankrupt and layoff millions of people, I must ask where is you comapassion for your fellow man? You are basically saying it is ok for millions of Americans to lose their homes, struggle to put food on the table, be unable to send their kids to college, stand in bread lines for their daily quota of bread. Lending and borrowing produces a better life and it is necessary for economy to move. Saving for a house, car, college education and the like is very commendable but not realistic for the average American. The problem has been that too many people borrowed more than they were able to pay back. I mean do we need a home with 4,000 square feet or a hummer to transport us from point a to point b? Of course not.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        2 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 50%
        unome29 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        It seems to me that when we no longer have a free press [9-11] and we no longer have a government ruled by the people [ military industrial empire] that maybe it is time for revolution.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        2 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 100%
        Grrr9 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        But this article and many comments do miss a major point of the stimulus, which is needed.
        Businesses, even healthy ones, do run on credit.
        Don't get me wrong, the bank bailouts were a con-job by Bernanke and his den-of-thieves, and that money is wasted. Those banks with fraudulent books hiding the bad debt are the poison, and will gom up the works until they are allowed to die the death they should have already.
        That money should have been used for direct emergency lending to small and medium sized businesses that have viable markets and business models but no credit to stock their shelves or pre-pay their payroll with when accounts don't pay for net-60 at best. It's the grease that keeps the wheels turning during transaction lags.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          DarkWizard9 months, 1 week ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Unfortunately, there are two sides to this coin and getting banks to lend is only one side. Getting money into the hands of consumers is the real issue (the other side of the coin). Consumerism accounts for 2/3 of the cash flow in our economy and if families/individuals don't have disposable income, then lending money doesn’t really have the desired affect. Employment must increase along with wages. There is no way around this and no program will work without this happening.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply

          3 Replies

          loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          CaptainLucid9 months, 1 week ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          The author of this article is a moron who tries to simplify this situation to high school math while unaware that he can't handle elementary school. He invented a new name for something and thinks that confers him mastery over the subject.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 50%
            SpareChange9 months, 1 week ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Too bad Bush and the Republican Congress (which he had for 6 years) put us 4 trillion in debt (almost doubling our debt) when times were good and cash was flush. It means when we need to run on credit when times are tough, like now, that it's even harder for our economy.

            The only modern day president to have a surplus was Clinton. Let's hope Obama can get there too in a few years cuz God knows we have to pay down that debt somehow.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • Neutral
              Klarissa9 months, 1 week ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              There was a time when people were told to save up enough money to be able to survive for six months.

              Lots of complaining about how Japan had a high rate of savings that the US.

              Now the complaining is about not spending money.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              View All 27 Comments

              Add a Comment

              Sign In With Your Propeller Account

              Forgot your password?

              Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

              To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.